Boiler

That depends, it could.

1 is no so everything else is irrelevant.

what?

That sounds very suspect

If you wish both of them to immigrate

You were allowed to withdraw you application for entry.

the level of corruption id outstanding Anger builds over sweeping change in the way most Californians will pay for electricity https://uk.news.yahoo.com/anger-builds-over-sweeping-change-182341850.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAHY-H875hGI_yEpuBvObKBKNtbSO1Q3bEfyqvJsI0R0lPeXSO2pAsgsQyXMin2QkKOltQSKjs8cjZE-E96i4FzwGzOe7Bw6PU7dLeaZFrQ1PxqAca6IyeiGWRpb2OsPlNQXVBy2zlj6_ArEEMKRUX-DL98XlCGTedDi2Dy0v3b But opponents say the legislation was a financial gift to PG&E, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric, and will cause millions of Californians who live in small homes or apartments that use little electricity to pay more, while residents in large homes that use a lot of electricity will save money. “If you wanted to design a policy that would send the signal that conservation doesn’t count, this would be it,” said Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group. PG&E and SDGE executives did not respond to several phone calls and emails seeking comment. The inspiration for the new law came from a 2021 paper written by professors at UC Berkeley’s Energy Institute at Haas, which is partly funded by utility companies.

Hybrid owners trying to remove plugs to avoid road user charges https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/508403/hybrid-owners-trying-to-remove-plugs-to-avoid-road-user-charges Kathryn Trounson of EV lobby group Better NZ Trust said the fact people like Parker were trying to remove the plugs was an indictment of the way the government brought in the changes. "I think the number the government has put on it feels more like a finger in the wind than anything that's been worked out sensibly, and for 15km of range you can understand the gentleman in his Mitsubishi." Trounson does not dispute the need for change: she said with 100,000 EVs in the country, it was always expected they would have to start paying road user charges. But in the current design she fears it will turn people to petrol, with the change landing soon after scrapping Clean Car Discounts for EVs. "We are trying very hard to clean up our atmosphere... all those things are not going to work if people look at RUCs and no clean car discount and think, well I may as well buy an efficient petrol car. Those cars may be in the fleet for 15 years."

Joint Sponsor

What about her Doctor in the US?

Not sure about the age of Petitioners. With small children I would have thought younger. Is your Lawyer familiar with the I 864, actually the bigger issue is f her Layer os familiar with the I 864. Hopefully not. I think there is a duty to mitigate but that probably does not help with small children involved.

At least you do not have a ban

Ohh I have seen and heard quite a few, from my experience the worst ones are females in their 60's, obviously guessing at age as it would be rude to ask. Now I am not going to share my views and I think they assume I am a Dem? Not sure, anyway I have a deep distrust for Politicians generally.

https://casetext.com/case/kumar-v-kumar-in-re-kumar This is one that is pretty clear, we have had a few on VJ

I have, this Law firm does nothing but. https://www.soundimmigration.com/i-864-enforcement/ We enforce rights under the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support. We represent immigrants in cases under the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support. Attorney Greg McLawsen is the most recognized national authority on the Affidavit of Support and has represented more clients in enforcement lawsuits than any lawyer in the country. Get a free I-864 case assessment Schedule a free video consultation Zero upfront cost We represent clients on a contingency fee basis. There is no cost for us to begin work on your case, and we are paid only if we recover money for you. The undisputed I-864 experts We have represented more Affidavit of Support plaintiffs than any law firm in the country. No other firm even comes close. Nationwide representation We help clients across the United States recover damages under the Form I-864. From California to North Carolina, we have you covered. Risk free I-864 case assessment Get individualized legal advice about whether you have a claim under the Affidavit of Support. Consultations are free and you are under no obligation to work with our law firm. About I-864 enforcement. When someone obtains a green card through family-sponsored immigration, an Affidavit of Support is almost always signed. This document is a contract between the sponsor and U.S. government. By signing the document, the sponsor promises to provide financial support to the immigrant. The immigrant’s right to support under the I-864 is legally enforceable. If a sponsor refuses to fulfill his responsibility, the immigrant may sue in court. We work with I-864 beneficiaries to ensure they receive the support to which they are entitled. We represent clients at zero upfront cost. Our team.

This is interesting, now this guy I have been watching off and on for years, he flies 747s to interesting places, normally freight, and I have never heard him mention anything political. Now a Karen in the back seems worse than an Emu.

Is this part of the fight against the Patriarchy?

There is sopmething on the I 864 about assets you can realise without undue hardship, and selling your only residence is usually considered a hardship.

Presumably this is not your primary residence?

This could take some time

I assume Department of State.

10 years? How Long Does My Obligation as a Sponsor Continue? Your obligation to support the immigrants you are sponsoring in this Affidavit of Support will continue until the sponsored immigrant becomes a U.S. citizen, or can be credited with 40 qualifying quarters of work in the United States. Although 40 qualifying quarters of work (credits) generally equates to 10 years of work, in certain cases the work of a spouse or parent adds qualifying quarters. The Social Security Administration can provide information on how to count qualifying quarters (credits) of work. The obligation also ends if you or the sponsored immigrant dies or if the sponsored immigrant ceases to be a lawful permanent resident. Divorce does not end the sponsorship obligation

FOIA

The card on which an SSN is issued is still not suitable for primary identification as it has no photograph, no physical description, and no birth date. All it does is confirm that a particular number has been issued to a particular name. Instead, a driver's license or state ID card is used as an identification for adults. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_number Thinking about it I am not going to swear to the colour, could be blue, OK I need to try and find it. I am a few editions back but I think this is more like it, wonder what was brown. I assume my Employer uses E Verify, now I did not when I was doing I9s.

As I have said as an immigrant I have never shown it to anyone, I think I filed it when I got it so maybe able to find it. I do remember being unimpressed, a small brown card that I could have easily duplicated. Certainly not ID, I would have more success with my Costco card.