ConOfficer
-
Posts
197 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Posts posted by ConOfficer
-
-
10 hours ago, Ben&Zian said:
They can generally make a decision off the initial I-129f petition they receive from NVC.
This is totally false. The applicant's credibility in the interview is the deciding factor. The petition only tells you whether there is a legal relationship (in a K1 case, whether the applicant and petitioner are legally free to marry), it says nothing about the whether the relationship was entered into purely for immigration benefits. Also people can and do submit additional photos etc. during the interview.
-
-
2 hours ago, EM_Vandaveer said:
If you were deported, you need a waiver first. Having the waiver approved will in no way guarantee getting a tourist visa (which is highly unlikely, an uphill battle) but without the waiver it's guaranteed that you will NOT get a visa.
He said he was deported over 10 years ago, so he does not need a waiver. The 10 year bar has expired.
OP, I think most officers would give you a visa if everything you're stating is true. A long time has passed. International travel shows you're pretty successful. Would someone give up a solid profession to work illegally in the U.S? Doubt it.
You're not at any greater risk of being denied entry at the border. I write something like "10 year bar has expired" on the visa so the CBP officer knows I considered any ineligibility.
Suerte
-
15 minutes ago, geowrian said:
You are free to apply for it, however F-1 requires non-immigrant intent and having filed a DS-260 implies that you intend to immigrate. As such, you would almost certainly be denied IMO.
Disagree with this. It's quite common for someone waiting for a family based visa to apply for a student visa. You can issue them if you think the person intends to use the student visa appropriately and will return to their country to pursue the normal immigrant visa process. I'don't think a diversity visa applicant would be treated any differently.
-
Is he telling you he makes double of what is required or have you actually seen his tax returns?
Or maybe the I-864 was not filled out correctly.
-
Just want to add that I've seen many U.S. citizens jailed in other countries for doing exactly this - attempting to enter or leave another country with a lot of cash, even if declared, but especially when they did not declare it.
Not a good idea to travel with wads of $100 bills. If anything you just give a corrupt customs agent the opportunity to extort you.
-
1 hour ago, MyJourney said:
Give me one reason why she cannot adjust her status, one reason.
I mean legal reason, not your usual "I think"s.
If you file for adjustment of status within 90 days of entering the U.S. as a tourist there is a legal presumption that you had the intent to adjust status at the time of entry to the U.S. This can lead to the adjustment of status application being denied, entry of a 212(6)(c)(i) ineligibility for fraud, and the initiation of deportation proceedings.
Even after 90 days there is still a risk of fraud finding. I'm inferring here that she promised the CBP agents she did not intend to adjust status in the U.S. (otherwise they would have turned her around), so she's on record with that.
-
Just now, Alabamak1 said:
The only venezuelan affected by the ban are certain politician, not the general public or Venezuelan citizens
CBP turns around a lot of Venezuelan visa holders at the airports because of the economic situation there (lots of people working in the U.S. or just biding their time in Miami).
I wasn't referring to the limited travel ban.
-
Prior answer is correct. If he's Venezuelan there's already a real risk of being turned around at the airport.
How old were you when they got married? If you were under 18 you can file for him as your stepfather.
-
14 minutes ago, Californiansunset said:
You are from a VWP country
Poland isn't a visa waiver country. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/tourism-visit/visa-waiver-program.html.
Otherwise agree. OP needs to jump through hoops of getting married in Poland or apply for a tourist visa and get married in the U.S. understanding that she will need to return to Poland (or wherever she lives) until the J2 paperwork comes through.
-
-
Maybe Special Immigrant Juvenile Status. Needs a lawyer with knowledge of state family law.
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
He wasn't denied for failing to disclose a prior tourist visa refusal. That's not a material misrepresentation as it has no relevance to eligibility for a K visa. If he was refused as ineligible for a visa (for misrepresentation, unlawful presence, prior removal etc.) the refusal letter would have cited the pertinent section of the immigration and nationality act and stated whether a waiver is available.
My guess would be that he is not free to marry. Email the consulate and ask for an explanation. If you don't get a response in a couple weeks contact your senator/congressperson.
-
-
-
The CEAC status is meaningless. US government does not have the best technology.
If you're concerned email the embassy.
-
1 minute ago, Lemonslice said:
Definitely possible to make an adjustment to Medicaid fund received, it's done all the time - it's not a refund, it's an adjustment applied to the amount received in the following period. Still, OP would need to pay what she owes.
Are you saying that the U.S./state treasury actually gets its $6,000 back? Interesting.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
To most consular officers this is basically a permanent ineligibility. Officers aren't personally offended when someone uses a tourist visa to work or live in the U.S., but people do get angry about this kind of thing. I don't think you're getting a visa for 20-30 years at least. The IR5 category will also probably be eliminated by the time the kid turns 21.
I once asked a hospital in Florida how someone could retroactively pay for a birth and was told the hospital had no mechanism for returning Medicaid funds. Even if the hospital can recoup the full cost of the service provided, you still effectively stole money from U.S. taxpayers. So I don't think paying it back is really an option.
- Michael2017, Hypnos, geowrian and 5 others
- 8
-
-
He previously complied with all U.S. immigration laws. He had the opportunity to continue living in the U.S. if he really wanted to but departed.
I issue this 100%. If he shows up at SFO a year from now with all his belongings and says he's going to stay in the U.S. forever CBP can turn him around.
-
18 hours ago, Redheadguy03 said:
If it was in effect you'd get denied. No they won't hold the petition. It would eventually expire. Although, if the ban ends soon you might be ok.
This is only true for K visas, and even for Ks the embassy should hold the case while the beneficiary applies for a waiver.
-
8 hours ago, milimelo said:
You’d be surprised what kind of questions duty officers field.
1. Your average duty officer has zero experience with visa issues and won't know how to answer this question.
2. This person is not a U.S. citizen.
3. This is not an emergency.
Please don't encourage people to make after hours calls about this kind of issue.
Child born out of wedlock to US citizen father in the UK
in Consular Reports of Birth Abroad (CRBA)
Posted
You need the father's passport to prove citizenship. The transcripts can prove he lived in the U.S. for the request 5 years (two years after age 14).
DNA may be requested if you have no other evidence that could establish a biological relationship. The consulate would give you instructions in that case.