Jump to content

Crazy Cat

Members, Global Mod
  • Posts

    39,520
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    670

Everything posted by Crazy Cat

  1. Those don't look like any chickens I have ever seen.
  2. Visa Bulletin For October 2024 (state.gov)
  3. 20+ years. I-130 approval is just the first part. There is a very long queue. Waiting for a visa number to become available will take a very long time. Siblings (F4 category) with I-130 submission dates of Aug 1, 2007 are just now receiving visa numbers.
  4. ***Topic moved to Off-Topic as this is not a US immigration question***
  5. To avoid another rejection, just send a complete, new package.
  6. Did you marry? A K-1 fiance cannot file an I-485, but a spouse can. A fiance can file an I-765, but it would not get approval before the expiration of the I-94 (90 days after entry)., thus making it useless. 1. That depends on whether the new immigrant wants to work legally. 2. No, not too late. You can submit an I-765 after filing an I-485. Cost is $260.00 3. 5 years, I believe. 4. It Doesn't matter. Make sure you include the receipt for the I-485.
  7. ***Hijack comment split to new topic***
  8. ***OP edited by VJ Moderator to format as new topic***
  9. I think that was one of @OldUser's points. The OP is in danger of losing LPR status.
  10. Agree. Op could not ever legally adjust status through another Green card holder if he/she had ever accrued unlawful presence (the way I interpret the law).
  11. Did you adjust status through a perm resident after having accrued unlawful presence?
  12. You don't plan for him to immigrate for 6 years, correct?
  13. No permission is required for your spouse to file an I-130. An I-130 only establishes the relationship. It does not grant any immigration benefit in itself. In addition, no permission will be required when he immigrates if he is 21 years old..
  14. I would go back and take a closer look. That doesn't sound right. Besides, you could always fill the gaps by periods of "unemployed".
  15. Another vote to re-file online. It is easy....and you'll save $50.
  16. I saw that the ABC whistleblower did produce an affidavit about the rigged debate. Looks like Kamala had sample questions, and the conspirators agreed to fact check only Trump. They also agreed not to ask questions which would have been harmful to Kamala. This is crooked, dishonest, and maybe even illegal.
  17. Are you sure he properly signed it digitally?
  18. OK. I think I have it remerged back to the original location.
  19. These are fools who think we are fools, too. Why did the moderators not fact check that?
  20. ***This topic was split from an existing thread***
  21. ***Zombie thread locked***
×
×
  • Create New...