Jump to content

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

My Ugandan fiance is in Kenya. She was approved for K1 on March 12, and her three K2s already got their visas (Issued and picked up). However, her CEAC status still shows Approved after 2 weeks (with created and last updated date both being March 12). I inquired about her case via the contact that the embassy provides (VisitorVisaNairobi@state.gov), and I got this response:

 

Quote
We have reviewed our records and learned that your nonimmigrant visa application is still undergoing administrative processing to verify your qualifications for this visa.  Administrative processing often lasts about 90 days, but in some instances, it can take significantly longer.


I emailed them a second time to ensure this wasn't just a templated response and to get clarification since her case still shows Approved in CEAC (not Administrative Processing). Then they responded:
 

Quote
The application is approved however, mandatory administrative processing was required in the case, and this is now being carried out. We have no control over this procedure and the length of time it requires. However, we have noted to contact you as soon as this procedure is concluded.

 

So I'm looking for advice from anyone with experience:

Should she keep waiting in Kenya, or request the passport back so she can return to Uganda to wait from there? I'm concerned that requesting the passport back before the case is officially in Administrative Processing in CEAC may slow them down from being able to process and issue the visa. My understanding is that if it's Approved in CEAC, the next step is Issued and they cannot go to that step if we take the passport, right? Will they release the passport if it's going to take a long time in AP?

 

(Side note for those who don't know: Kenya/Uganda are in an East African partnership where you can technically travel with just a National ID, not a passport. However, unfortunately, she came via her passport and, as far as I know from research, she cannot travel back using a different document than she came with.)

 

Maybe I can get a letter from the embassy explaining the situation and use a copy of her passport along with her National ID?

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks!

Edited by Ethan G
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

From experience with Jaycel's process in the Philippines, her status stayed as "Approved" until the administrative processing was complete so it appears that it can be both "Approved" and in AP at the same time. The AP is not completed until the status changes to "Issued".

Adjustment of Status

CIS Office: Denver CO

Date Filed: 2024-11-18

NOA Date: 2024-11-21

RFE(s) : N/A

Bio. Appt.: 2024-12-26

Interview: 2025-07-23

Approval Date: 2025-07-24

Green Card Received Date: 2025-08-01

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

And no they cannot got to the issued stage unless they have the passport because they have to place the visa in the passport.

Adjustment of Status

CIS Office: Denver CO

Date Filed: 2024-11-18

NOA Date: 2024-11-21

RFE(s) : N/A

Bio. Appt.: 2024-12-26

Interview: 2025-07-23

Approval Date: 2025-07-24

Green Card Received Date: 2025-08-01

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline
Posted
4 hours ago, Ethan G said:

I'm concerned that requesting the passport back before the case is officially in Administrative Processing in CEAC may slow them down from being able to process and issue the visa.

You are correct.  It will delay the process and/or add even more administrative processing time. 

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Posted

The logistical problem is complicated by her desire to be in a different country.  She can request her passport back, and they can get it back from her when they are ready to issue, but she will need it to do any border crossings in the meantime.  It might be a tough choice to make, but she either requests her passport back or waits where she is.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Posted (edited)

Update: We are not officially in Administrative Processing in CEAC as of today 😬 They have not sent any email asking us to do or submit or fix anything, so hopefully that's a good sign. I found another case almost exactly like ours here and they got the visa a couple days later.

 

Screenshot2026-03-31at12_19_51PM.thumb.png.ceeb7292c0626808ed492fd945ccc692.png

Edited by Ethan G
Posted (edited)

On April 7, the CEAC status changed from Administrative Processing to Application Received (see below). In response to an investigation that my congressman did, the embassy responded saying:

Quote

We are pleased to inform you that the administrative review for Ms. A.'s case has been completed. The final step in the K-1 visa process is an online presence check for Ms. A. and all derivative applicants. This requirement became mandatory on March 30, 2026. We have sent Ms. A. detailed instructions for completing the online presence check. Once we receive her response, we will expedite the review to move her case forward as quickly as possible.

We have not received any instructions yet. I did have my fiance send an email based on instructions another K1 applicant shared with me (emailing ImmigrationVisaNairobi@state.gov with subject "M39 [full name] [case number]"). The email stated that she and her K2 dependents have no social media handles to share (i.e. they are not on social media at all). We already indicated this in the DS-160 (for her and her K2 dependents) but I guess they need a specific email from her? They didn't believe or notice her DS-160 answer? Why didn't this stop the K2 applicants from getting their visas issued last month? Maybe because they're young? I don't know the answer to these questions. And I'm not even sure the instructions were right for us since they were from a different K1 applicant, but they seem to be generic and relevant to our situation.

I think "Application Received" is their way of saying they're waiting on documents from us. In this case, I think that document is the email that we sent. Hopefully, but I don't know since they didn't tell us directly.

Screenshot 2026-04-07 at 4.38.51 PM.png

Edited by TBoneTX
name edited from quote
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

"Application Received" is the step when the Immigrant Visa Unit (who handles the K-1 processing, interview and approval) sends it to the NonImmigrant Visa Unit for Issuance (Because the K-1 is technically a nonimmigrant visa, it has to be issued by the NIV Unit). This status means the NIV Unit has received the application and will be processing the it for issuance.

Adjustment of Status

CIS Office: Denver CO

Date Filed: 2024-11-18

NOA Date: 2024-11-21

RFE(s) : N/A

Bio. Appt.: 2024-12-26

Interview: 2025-07-23

Approval Date: 2025-07-24

Green Card Received Date: 2025-08-01

Posted

We got the 221g today indicating my fiance needs to send her social media handles to the immigration email. We did that (she has none so we told them that). However, in the 221g they also told us we need to return the passports for her K2 dependents (they had already been issued last month and we have them). This is crazy to me. I'm not sure what to do. I emailed them hoping they would reconsider and realize they must have made a mistake as none of them have social media and they were already issued so why would they need the passports back!? But perhaps the 221g for the K1 invalidated the K2 visas automatically in the system and they need to reprint? The CEAC for the K2 that I checked is still in the "Issued" state. This is very concerning as it will cause further delays!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

A full name has been edited out of a quoted segment above.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...