Jump to content

15 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi folks. My apologies if this is posted in the wrong forum. Would appreciate any and all help and perspectives.

 

I'm a US citizen living in California, and my fiancée is an Irish citizen living in London doing her postdoc (she has a Phd in a science field). We plan on getting married later this year. The legal marriage and religious ceremonies will take place in Ireland, and then 1-2 months later we will have a reception in California. She would then go back to Europe to complete her postdoc. In the meantime, we will file a CR1 (I-130) while doing LDR until the visa process is complete. That is the plan I had in mind at least.

 

I need some guidance on what is the best way to logistically navigate this in a lawful manner. When she visits California for the reception, she would travel under an ESTA. She would legally be my wife, so should she just be completely honest with immigration officers? That she recently married an American citizen (me) and is visiting for a reception and intends to return to Ireland afterwards in a few weeks? She could of course come prepared with proof of employment, proof of tentative stay (hotel, airbnb, etc. reservations) and whatever else. I've been told (not by a lawyer) that this would be the best course of action. Similarly, in the future while the visa is being processed and she wanted to visit the US, she would have to show/establish intent to return?

 

Which brings me to my next question - what would be the best time to file the I-130 application? Should it be done in-between the Ireland and California events? That way there's proof that we have paid the fees and started the lawful process for a spouse visa before she returns back to Europe. Or should I wait until she goes back before filing the application?

 

I really appreciate anyone who responds. I realize that there are probably thousands of foreign spouses traveling to the US on a daily basis. I just want to do my due diligence and make sure everything goes as smoothly as possible. We are trying to do everything in a lawful manner.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Welcome to the forum!  Your thread is moved to the CR-1 Process forum, as a better fit.

 

Folks will be along to answer your questions.  Good luck!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

She has to answer the questions of the CBP officer truthfully, but she is not required to answer questions that are not asked (I.e. it is best to not embellish answers).  Many married couples in LDRs visit on ESTA/B2 while the I130 process is ongoing, so it does not matter when you file the I130 after the legal marriage.  The main point for the foreign spouse visiting is to have evidence of their need to return after their visit, don’t show up with all their worldly possessions for a supposed short visit, and don’t show a pattern of maxing out the stay (90 days on ESTA), and returning a few months later for another maximum stay.

 

Good Luck!

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Posted
13 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

She has to answer the questions of the CBP officer truthfully, but she is not required to answer questions that are not asked (I.e. it is best to not embellish answers).  Many married couples in LDRs visit on ESTA/B2 while the I130 process is ongoing, so it does not matter when you file the I130 after the legal marriage.  The main point for the foreign spouse visiting is to have evidence of their need to return after their visit, don’t show up with all their worldly possessions for a supposed short visit, and don’t show a pattern of maxing out the stay (90 days on ESTA), and returning a few months later for another maximum stay.

 

Good Luck!

Thank you for the response! This confirms what I had in mind then. 

 

Btw, for the reception she would be coming with her family. What do you suggest her family members say to the officers? Should they just be truthful, i.e. they're here for their daughter's wedding reception and then intend to return back home? I presume simply being truthful is generally the best course of action as long as nothing suspicious is being done.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, Feez said:

Should they just be truthful, i.e. they're here for their daughter's wedding reception and then intend to return back home?

Yes of course they should answer all questions they are asked truthfully.  Entry to the US for non-citizens is always at the discretion of the CBP officer but from the details you have shared, they are likely to be fine.  Strong ties to their home country helps to overcome the assumption that they may overstay.  Good luck with the wedding and spousal visa process!  Patience and attention to detail are key.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

It is a loooong process so I would file as soon as I could.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, Boiler said:

It is a loooong process so I would file as soon as I could.


Exactly this 👆👆 Congratulations on the upcoming wedding! Best of luck and hope for a speedy CR-1 process for you guys :) 

K1 Visa
EventDate

Service Center: California Service Center

Consulate: Manila, Philippines

I-129F NOA1: 2023-09-20

I-129F NOA2: 2024-06-11

US Entry: 2024-08-30

Marriage: 2024-10-25

 

Adjustment of Status

CIS Office: Denver CO

Date Filed: 2024-11-18

NOA Date: 2024-11-21

RFE(s) :

Bio. Appt.: 2024-12-26

 

Employment Authorization Document

Event/Date

CIS Office: NBC

Date Filed: 2024-11-18

Bio. Appt.: 2024-12-26

Approved Date: 2025-01-08

Date Card Received: 2025-01-18

Comments: Card Produced 2025-01-15
Estimates/Stats: Your EAD was approved in 51 days.

 

Comments : Phoenix, AZ LockBox - NOA1 Received in mail 12/02/24 - Biometrics completed 12/26/24 - I-765 Approved 01/08/2025 - EAD Card Received 01/18/2025

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Chile
Timeline
Posted (edited)

1) There is no obligation to volunteer red flags to the government. When asked the purpose of the trip they’re asking to determine if the admission is under ESTA’s business or tourism class. It is perfectly acceptable to say “vacation” since that is true. If they specifically ask if she’s visiting her spouse she has to be honest, but it’s not a requirement that she proactively disclose it. My husband landed in the U.S. with a pending I-130 on ESTA a week ago. Linked to my summary of his admission below.


2) There is no reason not to start the process as early as possible. You can delay at NVC as long as you want by paying the fee and then contacting them at least once a year to keep the petition open. We prepped the petition before hand and filed a week after getting the married, literally the day we landed in Chile after his visit here to get married. If you’re getting married in Ireland and she’s not already in the U.S., you could file the day you get the certificate.

 

Reason to wait for her to leave if you do the marriage in the U.S. is to not confuse USCIS with the “is she in the U.S.?” question and also requesting consular processing. Know you’re doing it in Ireland, but explaining the logic.


3) Re: the family visiting, I’m a strong advocate of the view that the response to “reason for visit?” at passport control in any country is one word — “vacation” — for any type of leisure travel unless asked to explain more. It’s accurate and it’s what the passport control officer is going to note on the admission form anyway, so no need to give more details unless asked.

 

My recent post about arrival on ESTA with pending I-130:

 

Edited by S2N
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Chile
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Follow-up to @TBoneTX’s excellent post to say that it’s extremely unlikely that there will be follow-ups to the accurate response of “vacation” and that if she has ever been to the U.S. before on a valid ESTA (even if it’s different than the current one), mobile passport control will further decrease the odds of follow-ups since it flags any issues before reaching the officer.
 

Only requirement for an Irish national to use it is a previous visit to the U.S. under the visa waiver program.

Edited by S2N
Posted
3 hours ago, S2N said:

Follow-up to @TBoneTX’s excellent post to say that it’s extremely unlikely that there will be follow-ups to the accurate response of “vacation” and that if she has ever been to the U.S. before on a valid ESTA (even if it’s different than the current one), mobile passport control will further decrease the odds of follow-ups since it flags any issues before reaching the officer.
 

Only requirement for an Irish national to use it is a previous visit to the U.S. under the visa waiver program.

She does plan to visit the US for the first time in August under ESTA. For about a week. Our wedding ceremonies won't be til October-December. In that situation, "Vacation" will be the best thing to say right? Since we would have no legal connection.

 

Thank you to everyone for the responses. I was recommended this site by someone on Reddit. I'm really glad I posed my question here. I'm a spoiled US born citizen so I've never had to seriously think about this stuff until I met my fiancée

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, Feez said:

"Vacation" will be the best thing to say right? Since we would have no legal connection.

Well, if she's questioned further, she can add "...for the purpose of building evidence of a bona fide relationship for the I-130 that we plan to file after marrying in a few months."

2 minutes ago, Feez said:

Thank you to everyone for the responses. I was recommended this site by someone on Reddit. I'm really glad I posed my question here.

This is precisely why we're here.  :) 

2 minutes ago, Feez said:

I've never had to seriously think about this stuff until I met my fiancée

None of us did.  You had the good taste to share your situation and questions with us.

==>  Be SURE to return to let us know what happened.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Chile
Timeline
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Feez said:

She does plan to visit the US for the first time in August under ESTA. For about a week. Our wedding ceremonies won't be til October-December. In that situation, "Vacation" will be the best thing to say right? Since we would have no legal connection.


“Vacation” is always the correct response even after marriage unless asked a follow-up. For “where are you staying?” the city name usually works. Most of the questions can be responded to with one word answers. No need to elaborate, she just needs to answer both simply and truthfully. Ireland isn’t a high risk country so it’s unlikely to cause any issues, but no need to give them more things to ask about.

 

She won’t be able to use mobile passport control the first time, but every time after she’ll be able to use it.
 

If she flies out of Dublin instead of Heathrow or Gatwick she’ll do passport control in Dublin.

 

Edit to add: the reason “vacation” is always correct is that ESTA has two classes, tourism or business. If she’s not coming under the business class, she is seeking admission as a tourist. The CBP officer is asking to determine which class of admission she is applying to enter under: WT (tourist) or WB (business). There is no WVMS class (Waiver-Visiting-My-Spouse.) That’s tourism — WT.

Edited by S2N
Posted
41 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Well, if she's questioned further, she can add "...for the purpose of building evidence of a bona fide relationship for the I-130 that we plan to file after marrying in a few months."

This is precisely why we're here.  :) 

None of us did.  You had the good taste to share your situation and questions with us.

==>  Be SURE to return to let us know what happened.

Gotcha. I'm going to bookmark this page so I have all this handy to reference in a few months time. Will be sure to provide an update!

 

28 minutes ago, S2N said:


“Vacation” is always the correct response even after marriage unless asked a follow-up. For “where are you staying?” the city name usually works. Most of the questions can be responded to with one word answers. No need to elaborate, she just needs to answer both simply and truthfully. Ireland isn’t a high risk country so it’s unlikely to cause any issues, but no need to give them more things to ask about.

 

She won’t be able to use mobile passport control the first time, but every time after she’ll be able to use it.
 

If she flies out of Dublin instead of Heathrow or Gatwick she’ll do passport control in Dublin.

 

Edit to add: the reason “vacation” is always correct is that ESTA has two classes, tourism or business. If she’s not coming under the business class, she is seeking admission as a tourist. The CBP officer is asking to determine which class of admission she is applying to enter under: WT (tourist) or WB (business). There is no WVMS class (Waiver-Visiting-My-Spouse.) That’s tourism — WT.

Gotcha. Simple and truthful until further questioned. I was not aware that Dublin airport has US preclearance. I just looked it up.
https://www.dublinairport.com/flight-information/travelling-to-usa/usa-preclearance

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Chile
Timeline
Posted
29 minutes ago, Feez said:

Gotcha. Simple and truthful until further questioned. I was not aware that Dublin airport has US preclearance. I just looked it up.
https://www.dublinairport.com/flight-information/travelling-to-usa/usa-preclearance

Simple. Truthful. Automated (GE or MPC)

 

Those are the three key words with CBP. She can do the first two this time. Every visit after she can do all three.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...