Jump to content

195 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

hola hermana mo!

Peace to All creatures great and small............................................

But when we turn to the Hebrew literature, we do not find such jokes about the donkey. Rather the animal is known for its strength and its loyalty to its master (Genesis 49:14; Numbers 22:30).

Peppi_drinking_beer.jpg

my burro, bosco ..enjoying a beer in almaty

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...st&id=10835

  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
I am trying to get a grasp of the constant bashing of "noobs" We were all new to this process at the beginning. Almost seems the equivalent of anti immigrant sentiment. The attitude of "I was here first and everyone that follows me should be treated like $hit"

Hey there, you're a sensible person who's been around a long time; I'm glad you don't understand it either. From the outside, it looks like a silly game that has taken on a life of its own. Since many of the people involved are usually quite nice and polite, I'm sure they don't realize how mean it looks to people who don't know their online personae. But it's the same old culture problem I've seen before here; one strong group dominates and the whole community has to suffer their behavior because *they're* having fun.

yay she's back! :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance:

hola hermana mo!

Hey guys, how's youse? Baby making and garden growing still? I'm still not done house painting; at this rate, may as well make it a new career. :crying:

Now That You Are A Permanent Resident

How Do I Remove The Conditions On Permanent Residence Based On Marriage?

Welcome to the United States: A Guide For New Immigrants

Yes, even this last one.. stuff in there that not even your USC knows.....

Here are more links that I love:

Arriving in America, The POE Drill

Dual Citizenship FAQ

Other Fora I Post To:

alt.visa.us.marriage-based http://britishexpats.com/ and www.***removed***.com

censored link = *family based immigration* website

Inertia. Is that the Greek god of 'can't be bothered'?

Met, married, immigrated, naturalized.

I-130 filed Aug02

USC Jul06

No Deje Piedras Sobre El Pavimento!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
yay she's back! :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance:

Hey guys, how's youse? Baby making and garden growing still? I'm still not done house painting; at this rate, may as well make it a new career. :crying:

check out this thread:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=191446 :wub:

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Hmmmm, there is certainly a big/huge difference between being a newbie and coming here posting some ####### that is clearly illegal or offensive and expecting to get affirmation from VJers.

I've always politely responded to newcomers confused about the process, but when certain topics surface and the OP starts going douche-style on other VJers the n00b calling is justified, IMO.

And btw, Meauxna! :dance:

Edited by Ladylethal

(Puerto Rico) Luis & Laura (Brazil) K1 JOURNEY
04/11/2006 - Filed I-129F.
09/29/2006 - Visa in hand!

10/15/2006 - POE San Juan
11/15/2006 - MARRIAGE

AOS JOURNEY
01/05/2007 - AOS sent to Chicago.
03/26/2007 - Green Card in hand!

REMOVAL OF CONDITIONS JOURNEY
01/26/2009 - Filed I-751.
06/22/2009 - Green Card in hand!

NATURALIZATION JOURNEY
06/26/2014 - N-400 sent to Nebraska
07/02/2014 - NOA
07/24/2014 - Biometrics
10/24/2014 - Interview (approved)

01/16/2015 - Oath Ceremony


*View Complete Timeline

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

I agree with Laura. As was said on the SAT in OT today, there is a difference between a newbie and a n00b. We were all newbies once of course. That being said, I also agree that it can be a bit scary for newcomers if they happen to come across a "n00b bashing" thread.

N-400 Naturalization Process

June 25, 2013 --Qualified for Citizenship!

October 12, 2017 --Electronically filed

October 13, 2017 --NOA1

October 31, 2017 --Biometrics Appointment -ATL

ROC

April 5, 2012 --Sent I-751 to Vermont Service Center

May 21, 2012 --Biometric Appointment at ATL office

December 12, 2012 --10 year Green Card in hand

DCF Process

October 10, 2009 --Married in São Paulo

January 14, 2010 --Filed I-130 at São Paulo Consulate for DCF

May 17, 2010 --VISA IN HAND!

June 24, 2010 --POE in Atlanta

Posted

So, just to confirm, we have a judge and jury outside of the moderation team, many of whom have been around a relatively short time themselves who determines which "newbs/noobs" posting in the upper forums (not OT) deserve to be ganged up, called a troll, bashed, etc.

Of course there are people who are annoying and some likely trolls, but there is a report button at the side of the post that can be used in a relatively drama-free fashion. I personally think the moderation team does a pretty efficient job at eliminating offensive posts.

I'm with meauxna, I don't get it.

90day.jpg

Posted

Add me to the "colour me confused" list with Robin and meauxna. Look, I am not a no-fun zone by any stretch of the imagination. However, I do feel that taking OT sensibilities outside of OT is really not on. It can be scary when you're a newcomer to VJ (and I choose that word specifically here) -- hell, TracyTN and meauxna scared the bejeebus out of me when I started, but I quickly learned that they were both just trying to help me when I was getting hysterical. They did NOT make fun of me for stupid questions. I try to return the goodwill by not acting like a jackass in the upper forums.

Sorry if I sound like a grumpy old biddy here, but this behaviour is both childish and exclusive. I have been watching it slowly spread over the past few months, and like one of the legions of high school footsoldiers who watch the cool kids mock the dorks and freaks and do nothing, I have remained mute. Frankly, I'm sick of it. If I were joining VJ now, I don't know if I'd want to stick around for fear of asking something stupid and being made fun of.

If we're old enough to get married, we're old enough to act like adults. Talk about all the ####### sex, romps with farm animals and political chicanery you like in OT but for ####'s sake keep it there.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)
Some particular induhviduals have zero class and need to be b1tch-slapped back to OT.
Si, man. Perhaps it's most prudent to handle things by a (comparatively) classy open post, or perhaps by PM, and if something truly crosses the line, "report" it. Don't let them feel the rod in their hindquarters until it's already on the way out.

Beyond newbie-bashing, my enraging peeve is the all-encompassing, sweeping advice that advocates a casual or cavalier attitude toward ANY aspect of this infernal immigration process. As just ONE example, how many times must we read the knee-jerk "You do not need to have a lawyer!" when such respondents cannot possibly know the circumstances, reading/perception/responding abilities, or other factors that are integral to whether a poster truly might (gasp, shudder) NEED a lawyer? More strikingly, how many NEW members of VJ even know all the factors to CONSIDER as they search for answers through the VJ fora and individual threads? Did any of us know even a fraction of "what was significant" when we began, or are some of us sadder and much wiser after learning the hard way? I, for one, probably should have consulted a GOOD lawyer before submitting my original papers, and I have relied on several excellent ones to drag me from subsequent hellholes. Who are others to say "no one needs a lawyer"?

Almost as bad are the posters who "parachute in" to a multipage thread that they obviously haven't bothered to read, and they answer the original post (usually copying the entire thing, rather than clipping pertinent sentences) with answers or opinions that have already been stated multiple times. In such instances, let's ponder whether we have something genuinely of value to add. I'm not perfect at this, but I will force myself to read a multipage thread to see if someone has crafted an excellent answer -- and I usually conclude that theirs is better than mine would have been.

If the above extra peeves are off THIS topic, I apologize, but perhaps they're worthy of discussion, si man. If not, so be it.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

This thread is a classic example of someone who is relatively new asking a rather innocuous question (is there a bias against a nationality) that sure, has been asked countless times and is only being asked out of frustration getting the full-on smackdown by our chorus of "newb/noob" bashers:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...t&p=3061526

I checked to see if it had been linked for an attack to be launched and lo and behold someone had:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...t&p=3061564

I wonder who the OP is going to feel the next time she needs to post a legitimate question?

But hey, it's all just fun and games, it's not like we are dealing with people's lives here.

90day.jpg

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: England
Timeline
Posted

Amen, Robin. It is really sad how VJ has degenerated over the last few months. I know simple, repetetive questions can be annoying, but the best way to not be upset by them is to leave them alone. The thread will run its course much sooner. Piling on only makes the OP feel bad, while the pilers on just look like jerks.

VJ used to be a place that welcomed new members and gave them a place to get help, as well as offering a safe haven to vent amongst those who have gone through/are still going through the visa process and find some understanding. Its sad that some members can't remember how it felt to be still mired in the process.

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

yeah the noob bashing is not good.... but it really isn't anything new..

I remember when I first joined in 2004 I didn't even post for a few months because there was this group of people who scared me.. they seemed to rip apart people who posted the wrong thing...

mvSuprise-hug.gif
Filed: Timeline
Posted
VJ used to be a place that welcomed new members and gave them a place to get help, as well as offering a safe haven to vent amongst those who have gone through/are still going through the visa process and find some understanding. Its sad that some members can't remember how it felt to be still mired in the process.

Did we join the same VJ? :lol:

I did not enjoy my initiation when I first came here. I remember every single one of those members' names and, no matter how nice they were afterwards, I still have not forgotten the hurt and the injustice of when people make assumptions/jump to conclusions, or put words in your mouth. I've let it go, but I remember. For a time I resorted to PM's to bypass the hostility. After a while I found some great friends and some harmony in the Canada Forum, so I settled in there.

I have no problem with atypical behaviour in the OT forum, or in threads where it's appropriate. But I do feel some concern when it spills over into the upper forums where people are asking legitimate questions or voicing their thoughts.

iagree.gif
Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: England
Timeline
Posted

I do agree, Krikit, that there have always been members who were rough on new members. But there was also some who took the time to explain things is a way that didn't make you feel like a jackass for asking. The last several months, VJ has become particularly vicious. And the piling on is simply out of control. It really has become a pitchfork and torches mentality. Over time, VJ has lost some great resource members because there is that certain faction who continually engage in this behavior. Sadly, they have been able to recruit more members to this mob, which has made VJ not only unpleasant, but not as useful as it once was.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted
This thread is a classic example of someone who is relatively new asking a rather innocuous question (is there a bias against a nationality) that sure, has been asked countless times and is only being asked out of frustration getting the full-on smackdown by our chorus of "newb/noob" bashers:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...t&p=3061526

I checked to see if it had been linked for an attack to be launched and lo and behold someone had:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...t&p=3061564

I wonder who the OP is going to feel the next time she needs to post a legitimate question?

But hey, it's all just fun and games, it's not like we are dealing with people's lives here.

Hmmm. Ok. This is apparently about me. Someone PM'd me to suggest I look at the discussion in this thread. There seems to be a consensus here amongst many of you that we pwners are playing too rough (We prefer the term 'pwning' to 'bashing'. Has it gotten excessive on some occasions? Probably. Yes. Should it be toned down? Maybe. I submit below the "rules of engagement" that I personally play by, or at least try to play by. Have a look -- see if you don't think this is reasonable. Note that the vast majority of innocent newbies (truly newcomers to VJ, just wanting help, as all of us once did) - are in category 1, and I entirely agree deserve to be treated sympathetically. Most of the rest are Category 2 people, still deserve respect. Category 3 and down... and we have such, I personally believe THEY are the ones who degrade the value of VJ as a resource. Are we a vigilante squad, by deciding to "harass" them? You could say that. But VJ is a peer community. Just as pushbrk or Gary&Ala or Bobby take it on themselves to "expert" on immigration questions -- no one ever appointed them -- who is to say that we pwners shouldn't decide which corner of the peer-helping effort we feel needs tackling? Well -- the mods and Ewok can certainly make that call. But not those of you who are VJ members just like we are.

Myself, personally, I don't post all that much on immigration topics. I am active on Thai regional forums. I used to be very active on the AP@NVC thread, enough to have actually donated my time and effort to create a tracking list for those of us who unfortunately got stuck there (see the link in my sig). Otherwise I generally stick to OT. The "Noobz" thread is as much (if not more) a social hangout as it is a pwning squad. We poke as much fun at ourselves as we do at anyone (I've been 'pwned' mercilessly any number of times).

Here is my classification of noobs, in order from good noob to bad noob.

1. People who have already done some research on their own, have read VJ guides and/or equivalent, and have specific questions. ---- very cool, deserve lots of help.

2. People who post new threads on topics that have already been covered many times before in the forums, where a little bit of searching will give them the answer they need. --- not so cool. Give them a brief response, point them to Guides and/or a relevant message thread that covers their Q.

3. People that start "it's all about me" threads. You know the kinds I mean... inevitably the OP is a wonderful person, but somehow everyone is out to get him/her. Inevitably these threads are not about immigration topics but usually about relationship help or some other online therapy session. They tend to go on forever. Sometimes they can be entertaining to read in a morbid voyeuristic way. But they are n00b threads, for sure! ---- not so cool, but they get a pass from the noob patrol for the first 50 posts or so. After post #50 it's fair game to post one of those "Not this f#cking thread again" pics, or a "Will this thread never end?" pic.

4. People who want validation for their attempts at visa fraud. You know -- "Oh, look at me. I'm in the US on an overstayed visa, but it's really swell here and I think I'll stay. How do I find a chopf##k to marry me and adjust status?". Or --- "We did a K1 but I was still married. Silly me. I don't have to start over right? I can just tell them at the interview that I was never married, right?" ------- Big time LOOZER N00bz deserve all the heartless azzbusting we can lay on sorry azzes!

5. Scamsters and trolls who start threads which invariably get locked for TOS violations. You can see the locks coming from the instant you read the OP. ---- These guys need serious n00b pwning.

6. So called "experts" who are regulars on VJ and respond to innocent OPs with "helpful" advice that is often wrong and can land OP in deep deep doodoo if they followed that advice. An example would be telling someone who entered with immigration intent that it's no big deal to get married and adjust status - an action which can result in deportations and bans if the OP is not careful. ---- this is probably the worst of all, even worse than stupid lame scammers and trolls. Nothing but scorn should be heaped on these azzholes.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
Here is my classification of noobs, in order from good noob to bad noob.
Upon reflection, I consider this to be a comprehensive and well-ordered list, si man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...