Jump to content

19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Country: Guyana
Timeline
Posted

Some very salient points made herein.  Comments?

 

Quote

Security state agencies must justify their existence.

There are 1,271 counterterrorist, homeland security, and intelligence organizations; 1,931 private sector analogues; 10,000 locations of these organizations; and ~854,000 people with top-secret security clearances as of 2010. To make matters worse, the line between private and public is obscure in this industry.

 

This massive effort requires massive tax collection. Since government endeavors do not compete and do not participate in reciprocal exchanges, then they have no profit-and-loss test to determine if their efforts are worth the money taken from citizens. Additionally, since only the free market can determine prices, government endeavors must continually disseminate propaganda to convince citizens that the endeavor is useful.

 

Continues here: https://mises.org/wire/americas-secret-government-proxy 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

And how many of the 854,000 are politicized, as with the FBI, DOJ, et al.?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
19 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

And how many of the 854,000 are politicized, as with the FBI, DOJ, et al.?

i know of one who isn't   :)

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted

A top secret clearance,  does not necessarily mean you have access to sensitive James Bond info.

 

I had a top secret clearance when I worked in a brigade S2 shop.  The only thing I ever saw when they opened the safe was a Booby Trap Manuel.  I saw the same Manuel for sale at the surplus store a few weeks later.

 

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
20 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Manuel

And what about José, Pancho, Humberto, and Jorgé?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
3 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

A top secret clearance,  does not necessarily mean you have access to sensitive James Bond info.

 

I had a top secret clearance when I worked in a brigade S2 shop.  The only thing I ever saw when they opened the safe was a Booby Trap Manuel.  I saw the same Manuel for sale at the surplus store a few weeks later.

 

 

odds are that s2 shop was not able to store ts - most are lucky if they can store secret.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Ban Hammer said:

odds are that s2 shop was not able to store ts - most are lucky if they can store secret.

I am sure you are correct.  Still you would agree most with TS clearance don't see really super sensitive type stuff.

 

Also a secret clearance is nothing but a finger print background check. If I am not mistaken and my memory serves me correctly every officer had a secret clearance. I am pretty sure all of my fellow cadets got one when we got commissioned. 

 

Not sure about warrant officers. All they do is lay around the quarters and drink. 

Edited by Nature Boy 2.0
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
3 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I am sure you are correct.  Still you would agree most with TS clearance don't see really super sensitive type stuff.

 

Also a secret clearance is nothing but a finger print background check. If I am not mistaken and my memory serves me correctly every officer had a secret clearance. I am pretty sure all of my fellow cadets got one when we got commissioned. 

 

Not sure about warrant officers. All they do is lay around the quarters and drink. 

there is ts, and then there is ts with caveats.  the caveats require more than just a ts clearance.
secret used to be a national agency check, that has changed to include a law and credit check.  in addition to every officer having a secret clearance, every officer could function as a notary public.
warrants usually refined their ability to come and go at the blink of an eye.


 

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted
3 hours ago, Ban Hammer said:

there is ts, and then there is ts with caveats.  the caveats require more than just a ts clearance.
secret used to be a national agency check, that has changed to include a law and credit check.  in addition to every officer having a secret clearance, every officer could function as a notary public.
warrants usually refined their ability to come and go at the blink of an eye.


 

I did not know I could have been a notary.  Never heard that before.

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
2 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I did not know I could have been a notary.  Never heard that before.

 

you probably were not told as you can't spell "notary"...........

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Country: Guyana
Timeline
Posted
11 hours ago, Ban Hammer said:

there is ts, and then there is ts with caveats.  the caveats require more than just a ts clearance.
secret used to be a national agency check, that has changed to include a law and credit check.  in addition to every officer having a secret clearance, every officer could function as a notary public.
warrants usually refined their ability to come and go at the blink of an eye.


 

I heard a rumor long ago that a CW3 left a spare cover on his desk and people thought he was still at work long after he had enjoyed many days at the golf course and had PCS'd to Hawaii.

I'm sure no WO ever did this, however.  Doesn't pass the common sense test.

Posted
12 hours ago, LIBrty4all said:

I heard a rumor long ago that a CW3 left a spare cover on his desk and people thought he was still at work long after he had enjoyed many days at the golf course and had PCS'd to Hawaii.

I'm sure no WO ever did this, however.  Doesn't pass the common sense test.

I did an OER for a Warrant one time. CWO XXX exceeded at eating MRE's , breathing oxygen and staying well hidden.  Not joking 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...