76% of September (Vermont) Covid-19 deaths are vax breakthroughs

[jg121783 3,917]

https://vermontdailychronicle.com/2021/09/30/76-of-september-covid-19-deaths-are-vaxxed-breakthroughs/

 

The pro covid vaccine narrative is collapsing as more data comes out.

[Dashinka 24,579]

I loved how the bureaucrat was trying to spin it.

[jg121783 3,917]

3 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

I loved how the bureaucrat was trying to spin it.

I saw that. Waiting for someone to comment quoting that part to try to dismiss it. There is always some excuse when the numbers don't support the narrative.

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

There will be more to follow on this topic, I am certain.

 

 

https://ulozto.net/tamhle/eRcBsnurTriQ#!ZGqwLGR2ZmHkZGR4AGZ1AwEyAwIvLyScpyD5MGuALGpmEJD4Lj== 

[TBoneTX 45,469]

Regardless of reality, anyone who doesn't get double- or triple-shot needs to be shunned, doxxed, canceled, fired, and prohibited from traveling or congregating anywhere.

[top_secret 2,440]

Well according to that article 88% of eligible Vermont residents are vaccinated.  It states that 76% of the deaths, come from this pool of 88% of the population.  That means that the 12% of eligible Vermont residents who are not vaccinated accounted for 22% of the deaths.  A PER CAPITA death rate nearly twice as high as the vaccinated population.

 

But what is even more notable about the article is that there were only 33 deaths in Vermont during the entire month of September.  Compare that to a state like Texas.  PER CAPITA Texas is having as many deaths every 4 or 5 days as Vermont has in a month.  It is entirely likely that even the unvaccinated population in Vermont is benefiting from less exposure to disease due to having such a high percentage of vaccinated neighbors. 

 

The article does kind of make a good case for boosters though.  Perhaps many of the 33 that died could have been saved too if the had boosters.

 

 

 

 

[AnonIndia 58]

2 hours ago, top_secret said:

Well according to that article 88% of eligible Vermont residents are vaccinated.  It states that 76% of the deaths, come from this pool of 88% of the population.  That means that the 12% of eligible Vermont residents who are not vaccinated accounted for 22% of the deaths.  A PER CAPITA death rate nearly twice as high as the vaccinated population.

 

But what is even more notable about the article is that there were only 33 deaths in Vermont during the entire month of September.  Compare that to a state like Texas.  PER CAPITA Texas is having as many deaths every 4 or 5 days as Vermont has in a month.  It is entirely likely that even the unvaccinated population in Vermont is benefiting from less exposure to disease due to having such a high percentage of vaccinated neighbors. 

 

The article does kind of make a good case for boosters though.  Perhaps many of the 33 that died could have been saved too if the had boosters.

 

 

 

 

People should just cut to the chase and complete the protocol of all three vax manufacturers. I heard it gives the best results. 

[jg121783 3,917]

4 hours ago, top_secret said:

The article does kind of make a good case for boosters though.  Perhaps many of the 33 that died could have been saved too if the had boosters.

Yep endless boosters are the answer. Meanwhile big pharma is laughing all the way to the bank with no liability whatsoever for the products they put out that are mandated by governments.

[LIBrty4all 3,754]

14 hours ago, top_secret said:

Well according to that article 88% of eligible Vermont residents are vaccinated.  It states that 76% of the deaths, come from this pool of 88% of the population.  That means that the 12% of eligible Vermont residents who are not vaccinated accounted for 22% of the deaths.  A PER CAPITA death rate nearly twice as high as the vaccinated population.

 

But what is even more notable about the article is that there were only 33 deaths in Vermont during the entire month of September.  Compare that to a state like Texas.  PER CAPITA Texas is having as many deaths every 4 or 5 days as Vermont has in a month.  It is entirely likely that even the unvaccinated population in Vermont is benefiting from less exposure to disease due to having such a high percentage of vaccinated neighbors. 

 

The article does kind of make a good case for boosters though.  Perhaps many of the 33 that died could have been saved too if the had boosters.

 

 

 

 

Ummm, no.  Just a simple NO will do just fine.