Jump to content
TVM

VISA refused because of 243(d)

 Share

19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Laos
Timeline

Hello, 

My fiance passed her interview in Vientiane, Laos, but now she received a letter saying that she cannot be issued a a visa pursuant to the Secretary's order of March 17, 2020 under section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.  the letter says The decision cannot be appealed.  Her VISA case status in CEAC says refused.  Does this mean we have to go through the whole process again or when the sanction is lifted, the consular office will review her case again?  Would she have to go through the whole VISA interview again?  Does anyone know when and if section 243(d) will be lifted in Laos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the statement from the Embassy around this:

 

Quote

Important Note: As of April 1, 2020, the United States has discontinued issuance of all nonimmigrant visas (NIVs) for Lao citizens and nationals applying in Laos, except for A1, A2, C2, G1, G2, G3, G4, NATO1, NATO2, NATO3, NATO4, NATO5, and NATO6 visas, and others whose travel is covered by Section 11 of the UN Headquarters Agreement, subject to limited exceptions. This action was taken pursuant to section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).  For more information, please open this link (PDF 149 KB).

 

If you open the PDF linked above it says the following (emphasis mine):

 

Quote

Visa applications submitted before April 1, 2020, but not yet issued, will be subject to the discontinuation. Should an individual subject to the Secretary's order submit a visa application after April 1, 2020, the consular section will proceed with an interview. However, a consular officer will not be able to issue a visa to applicants subject to the Secretary’s order until visa issuance is resumed. Visa issuance covered by the Secretary’s order for Laos will resume once the Secretary of Homeland Security sends the Secretary of State the notice required by U.S. law, relating to the country’s acceptance of its nationals. Consular operations at the U.S. Embassy in Vientiane will continue. These visa restrictions do not affect other consular services provided, including adjudication of applications from individuals not covered by the suspension.Once these sanctions have been lifted, the Embassy may issue nonimmigrant visas to eligible visa applicants. The U.S. Department of State will provide information on how to continue with discontinued visa applications. Nonimmigrant visa applicants who were previously found ineligible for a visa and whose visa applications were refused on such basis, suchas under INA 212(a), will not be reconsidered.

Note that this appears to apply to immigrant visas as well.

 

My reading of the above is that if/when sanctions are lifted, they "may" issue the visa, and you should be prepared to follow additional instructions from the DOS if/when the time comes in order for that to happen. What those instructions might be and the timeline for sanctions to be lifted is anyone's guess -  it appears that sanctions on certain visas have been in place since 2018.

Edited by JKLSemicolon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Visa Sanctions

Pursuant to his authority under Section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf notified Secretary of State Michael Pompeo that the governments of Burundi and Ethiopia have denied or unreasonably delayed accepting their nationals ordered removed from the United States. As a result, Secretary of State Pompeo has ordered consular officers in these countries to implement visa restrictions on certain categories of visa applicants, determined on a country-by-country basis. These sanctions will remain in place until the Secretary of Homeland Security notifies Secretary Pompeo that cooperation on removals has improved to an acceptable level.

Visa sanctions have been previously invoked against the following countries: Guyana in 2001, The Gambia in 2016, Cambodia, Eritrea, Guinea, and Sierra Leone in 2017, Burma and Laos in 2018, Cuba, Ghana and Pakistan in 2019. Visa sanctions have since been lifted against Guyana, Guinea, and The Gambia.

 

 

Are you prepared to move to Laos to be together?  My guess is they will return the petition to USCIS, where it will expire.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
20 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

Visa Sanctions

Pursuant to his authority under Section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf notified Secretary of State Michael Pompeo that the governments of Burundi and Ethiopia have denied or unreasonably delayed accepting their nationals ordered removed from the United States. As a result, Secretary of State Pompeo has ordered consular officers in these countries to implement visa restrictions on certain categories of visa applicants, determined on a country-by-country basis. These sanctions will remain in place until the Secretary of Homeland Security notifies Secretary Pompeo that cooperation on removals has improved to an acceptable level.

Visa sanctions have been previously invoked against the following countries: Guyana in 2001, The Gambia in 2016, Cambodia, Eritrea, Guinea, and Sierra Leone in 2017, Burma and Laos in 2018, Cuba, Ghana and Pakistan in 2019. Visa sanctions have since been lifted against Guyana, Guinea, and The Gambia.

 

 

Are you prepared to move to Laos to be together?  My guess is they will return the petition to USCIS, where it will expire.

 

What's wrong with getting married and petition for a spouse?

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, payxibka said:

What's wrong with getting married and petition for a spouse?

Well sure, if the OP wants to go that route, they can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
16 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

Well sure, if the OP wants to go that route, they can. 

But you didn't offer it up as a potential path.

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, payxibka said:

But you didn't offer it up as a potential path.

It probably is a more reasonable path than simply waiting to see if the petition will be reinstated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
25 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

It probably is a more reasonable path than simply waiting to see if the petition will be reinstated.

Sure, and once again I must follow you as tbe voice of reason.   :)

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, payxibka said:

What's wrong with getting married and petition for a spouse?

As I linked in my post above, all immigrant visas from the Embassy in Laos are also discontinued according to this:

 

https://la.usembassy.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/85/IV-website-text-English-lao-VS3-1.pdf

 

But even so, getting married and petitioning for an IR-1/CR-1 visa might still be the preferred option versus waiting out the process for the K-1. That would result in being able to bypass Adjustment of Status, etc. if an approval were to happen, and the extra processing time from starting over is less of an issue since everything is on hold due to the sanctions anyway. This route could also be combined with the USC moving to Laos if wanting to wait out the process together, but that's going to depend on @TVM and their situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, hnubno92 said:

My husband is petitioning for his mom (my mil) from Laos too so I guess that means there won't be a visa issued anytime soon for us too.  We just got the I130 approved and moved on to NVC stage.   

There really isn’t any way to know until the consulate phase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Laos
Timeline

My wife pass her interview in Feb and we are still waiting for the sanction to be left all we can do is wait there is no timeframe at the moment I have reached out to the embassy, join zoom call in a town hall meeting with the ambassador In Laos and he said until Laos make an effort to accept any deportee from the u.s.a which Laos says after they have left Laos for 7 year with no Laos visa they are no longer Laos citizen then will usa left the sanction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

A noncontributory post has been removed.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...