Jump to content

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey everyone,

 

I'm finishing up my packet and hoping to get it shipped soon. Looking through the instructions for the I-129F it seems like the evidence of meeting within the last two years should be presented as additional information. Does that mean that I have to sign and date all the pages?

 

I have a lot of evidence amounting to 26 pages. I don't want to sign all 26 pages if It's not needed. 

 

Any tips on this would be greatly appreciated. 

 

-AS

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Welcome to the forum.

 

No need to sign, but paper-clip it together with a cover page that says "evidence of meeting in person within 2 years (26 pp)."  If some of this is photos, type or write on them where you were and when.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
2 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Welcome to the forum.

 

No need to sign, but paper-clip it together with a cover page that says "evidence of meeting in person within 2 years (26 pp)."  If some of this is photos, type or write on them where you were and when.

Awesome thank you for the quick reply!

 

I have another question – Am I allowed to use a highlighter to highlight the names and dates on boarding passes and hotel receipts?

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
25 minutes ago, MrAdamSmith said:

Hey everyone,

 

I'm finishing up my packet and hoping to get it shipped soon. Looking through the instructions for the I-129F it seems like the evidence of meeting within the last two years should be presented as additional information. Does that mean that I have to sign and date all the pages?

 

I have a lot of evidence amounting to 26 pages. I don't want to sign all 26 pages if It's not needed. 

 

Any tips on this would be greatly appreciated. 

 

-AS

I'd create a table of contents for your packet. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, MrAdamSmith said:

I have a lot of evidence amounting to 26 pages. I don't want to sign all 26 pages if It's not needed. 

Way too much.  Think of the poor person who has to wade through all that fluff.

 

Passport stamps and boarding passes are the best evidence for the one-time meeting requirement.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Nigeria
Timeline
Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, MrAdamSmith said:

Awesome thank you for the quick reply!

 

I have another question – Am I allowed to use a highlighter to highlight the names and dates on boarding passes and hotel receipts?

on the instructions it says you shouldn’t highlight anything because it will make it difficult when they scan the pages.

 

 

https://www.uscis.gov/forms/forms-information/form-filing-tips

E6B1375F-5637-47F7-A360-1BD0904AB3F2.jpeg

Edited by PatLuvO
Posted
50 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

Way too much.  Think of the poor person who has to wade through all that fluff.

 

Passport stamps and boarding passes are the best evidence for the one-time meeting requirement.

I thought so as well when I was putting everything together, but I decided I rather be safe than sorry and have to deal with a RFE down the road. 

Posted
50 minutes ago, PatLuvO said:

on the instructions it says you shouldn’t highlight anything because it will make it difficult when they scan the pages.

 

 

https://www.uscis.gov/forms/forms-information/form-filing-tips

I thought this applied to the actual application itself and not the evidence I will provide? It was difficult for me to find my own name and dates on some of the boarding passes and hotel confirmations. I figured It would be easier for whoever is reviewing the evidence to see important details already highlighted. 

But safe, than sorry. I won't highlight anything. Thanks!

 

50 minutes ago, PatLuvO said:

 

 

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
10 minutes ago, MrAdamSmith said:

I thought so as well when I was putting everything together, but I decided I rather be safe than sorry and have to deal with a RFE down the road. 

No such thing as extra credit.   One tick of the box is the same as several.  RFEs happen because of poor choices in selecting proper evidence.  It is quality not quantity.   1 page if quality evidence defeats 26 pages of poor evidence everyday 

YMMV

Posted
13 minutes ago, payxibka said:

No such thing as extra credit.   One tick of the box is the same as several.  RFEs happen because of poor choices in selecting proper evidence.  It is quality not quantity.   1 page if quality evidence defeats 26 pages of poor evidence everyday 

I wholeheartedly agree. Thanks for your input. 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
24 minutes ago, MrAdamSmith said:

I wholeheartedly agree.

Bear in mind, however, that the consulate will be reviewing what USCIS will eventually send them.

Some consulates are far tougher than others.

In which country is your fiancee?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
55 minutes ago, MrAdamSmith said:

I thought so as well when I was putting everything together, but I decided I rather be safe than sorry and have to deal with a RFE down the road. 

......until you get an RFE due to some extra thing in your packet that raised questions.....  we have seen that, too.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, Jorgedig said:

we have seen that, too.

Links, please.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
3 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Bear in mind, however, that the consulate will be reviewing what USCIS will eventually send them.

Some consulates are far tougher than others.

In which country is your fiancee?

Easy or hard consulate,  ###### evidence is still ###### evidence

YMMV

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...