Guilty: 6 Takeaways From Manafort's And Cohen's Big Day

[Keith & Arileidi 437]

"In a split-screen whiplash, a regular Tuesday turned into a blockbuster with two top people close to President Trump now facing prison"

 

https://www.npr.org/2018/08/22/640745928/guilty-6-takeaways-from-manaforts-and-cohen-s-big-day

 

Uh oh ...SpaghettiOs. 

Edited August 22, 2018 by Keith & Arileidi

[smilesammich 10,727]

i was wondering if these very relevant current events and hot topics would ever be posted 😉

 

 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

i was wondering if these very relevant current events and hot topics would ever be posted 😉

 

 

Why did you sit there wondering all that time instead of doing it yourself,?

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Why did you sit there wondering all that time instead of doing it yourself,?

i figure i'll just let ya'll do your thing from time to time. sometimes i just like to observe. 

 

Quote

No matter how Trump tries to spin it — calling the investigation a "witch hunt" or Manafort a "good man" (at a West Virginia rally where chants of "Lock her up!" could be heard) — the conviction and Cohen's guilty plea are black eyes for the president. They add to Democrats' narrative that in the midterms, they are running against a scandal-plagued administration and party — something that helped them take back the House in 2006.

A case in point is Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts senator and possible 2020 presidential candidate, who unveiled an anti-corruption platform on Tuesday. She said the Trump era "has given us the most nakedly corrupt leadership this nation has seen in our lifetimes."

i think you should all just keep calling warren names, seems effective.

Edited August 22, 2018 by smilesammich

[Dashinka 23,368]

Those were the six items the MDL media is opining about?  I heard Lanny Davis (of the Clinton Crime Family Foundation) now saying Cohen has the goods on Trump's collusion and he (Trump) will be gone soon (I guess the MDL will be dancing in the street), if this was in fact the case, why didn't Cohen get a walk, and why did Mueller hand this off to the SDNY office?  If he has such damaging information that can potentially bring down Trump, he might want to consider firing Davis and suing him for incompetence. 

[smilesammich 10,727]

drain the swamp! #maga

[Dashinka 23,368]

Just now, smilesammich said:

drain the swamp! #maga

With Comey, Brennan, Strzok, etc. gone, the water is going down.

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, Bill & Katya said:

With Comey, Brennan, Strzok, etc. gone, the water is going down.

hilarious. but i commend your loyalty to your chosen narrative.

[Dashinka 23,368]

2 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

hilarious. but i commend your loyalty to your chosen narrative.

I guess I like to believe in narratives that have proof rather than one that is a made up political narrative.  To each their own.

[jg121783 3,908]

So where is the Russia collusion Trump is supposedly guilty of? For that matter where is there evidence of Trump being guilty of any crime?

[smilesammich 10,727]

4 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I guess I like to believe in narratives that have proof rather than one that is a made up political narrative.  To each their own.

proof..like...guilty verdicts? indictments?

i get that trump stands by his boy. manafort, not cohen. naturally.

Edited August 22, 2018 by smilesammich

[jg121783 3,908]

3 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

proof..like...guilty verdicts? indictments?

i get that trump stands by his boy. manafort, not cohen. naturally.

You do know that indictments aren't proof of anything right?

[smilesammich 10,727]

4 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

You do know that indictments aren't proof of anything right?

sure. nothing but a witch hunt. i can read trump's twitter just as well as anyone else.

[jg121783 3,908]

I'm trying to make the same connection that the left is making here but I just can't get there. Somehow Manafort being guilty of tax related crimes means Trump is guilty of Russia collusion (or anything for that matter). How does that work?

[jg121783 3,908]

Just now, smilesammich said:

sure. nothing but a witch hunt. i can read trump's twitter just as well as anyone else.

There doesn't have to be any conclusive evidence of anything for there to be an indictment. This is law 101. If you can't grasp that I can't help you.