How the tolerant left treats others who disagree

[bcking 3,157]

9 minutes ago, eieio said:

Here’s A List Of Completely Substantiated (And Underreported) Attacks On Trump Supporters

 

JUSTIN CARUSO

Contributor

 

 

7:10 PM 11/17/2016 

4797

968

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the wake of Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential election, headlines have focused largely on unsubstantiated racist vandals, rather than several incidents of actual assault. Many other allegations about acts of hate and violence from Trump supporters have now been found to be questionable, if not outright false.

However, Trump supporters don’t seem to enjoy the same level of concern from the media when they are attacked by others. Here’s a list of substantiated, violent attacks directed at Trump supporters since the election

Read more:  http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/17/heres-a-list-of-completely-substantiated-and-underreported-attacks-on-trump-supporters/#ixzz4c9bVLdMq

So if that is a list of the completely substantiated attacks, there are 8 victims.

 

Your original post has I think 23 pictures. Where did the other 15 people come from?

 

I won't deny any of those attacks happened (the 8 in the article), and from reading the description they were all deplorable. Those people (the assailants) are hypocrits and quite honestly idiots. However, in a topic about how certain things are "over-represented" and other things are "under-represented", you should have an explanation for every photo that you posted otherwise you are doing exactly the same thing you accuse other people of doing by inflating something beyond its scope.

Edited March 23, 2017 by bcking

[eieio 1,594]

 

[bcking 3,157]

3 minutes ago, eieio said:

 

Oh god you realize going from photos to a video doesn't change anything right?

[Teddy B 17,252]

6 minutes ago, bcking said:

So if that is a list of the completely substantiated attacks, there are 8 victims.

 

Your original post has I think 23 pictures. Where did the other 15 people come from?

 

I won't deny any of those attacks happened (the 8 in the article), and from reading the description they were all deplorable. Those people (the assailants) are hypocrits and quite honestly idiots. However, in a topic about how certain things are "over-represented" and other things are "under-represented", you should have an explanation for every photo that you posted otherwise you are doing exactly the same thing you accuse other people of doing by inflating something beyond its scope.

I counted 31. Where did the other 23 come from? Let's go eieio, links and articles for each one or they never happened.

[bcking 3,157]

Just now, Teddy B said:

I counted 31. Where did the other 23 come from? Let's go eieio, links and articles for each one or they never happened.

Oh weird now I got 32. It's growing!

 

Maybe the Bowling Green Massacre was actually an attack on Trump supporters?

[eieio 1,594]

2 minutes ago, Teddy B said:

I counted 31. Where did the other 23 come from? Let's go eieio, links and articles for each one or they never happened.

Can I call you bcking jr? lol  We need to get some graphs and charts in here.

[Teddy B 17,252]

2 minutes ago, bcking said:

Oh weird now I got 32. It's growing!

 

Maybe the Bowling Green Massacre was actually an attack on Trump supporters?

I got 32 the first time I counted, but noticed one of them was a split pic of the same so called attack.

 

 

[bcking 3,157]

Just now, eieio said:

Can I call you bcking jr? lol  We need to get some graphs and charts in here.

You are trying to deflect. It is quite obvious.

 

Please provide us with "substantiated" attacks to account for the 31 photos otherwise you are part of the problem you claim to be against.

[Teddy B 17,252]

Just now, eieio said:

Can I call you bcking jr? lol  We need to get some graphs and charts in here.

This graph shows the increase of false claims of attacks on Trump supporters since the election.

 

[eieio 1,594]

2 minutes ago, bcking said:

You are trying to deflect. It is quite obvious.

 

Please provide us with "substantiated" attacks to account for the 31 photos otherwise you are part of the problem you claim to be against.

Oriz was correct.

[Teddy B 17,252]

This thread has officially been

 

 

 

Edited March 23, 2017 by Teddy B

[CaliCat 3,957]

7 minutes ago, Teddy B said:

This thread has officially been

 

 

 

 

This thread sunk the moment it was posted. 

[Teddy B 17,252]

3 minutes ago, CaliCat said:

 

This thread sunk the moment it was posted. 

[Dakine10 5,452]

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Actually, I think the intent of the OP was to show that there are extremists on the Left and to call out the hypocrisy of the MDL.  That seemed to work as the immediate response was there is no such thing as the Alt Left insinuating that extremism only resides on one side and thus the debate began.

  That may have been his intent back in December and January when this was being posted and discussed this previously. Posting a meme and calling random acts of violence the 'tolerant left' is not designed to point out hypocrisy, it's designed to provoke a response. I could just as well post a picture of the Indian man who was murdered in Kansas with a title 'look what the intolerant right does'.  It's very obvious when someone is posting just to get a reaction.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

3 minutes ago, Dakine10 said:

  That may have been his intent back in December and January when this was being posted and discussed this previously. Posting a meme and calling random acts of violence the 'tolerant left' is not designed to point out hypocrisy, it's designed to provoke a response. I could just as well post a picture of the Indian man who was murdered in Kansas with a title 'look what the intolerant right does'.  It's very obvious when someone is posting just to get a reaction.

Has anyone here ever posted anything to not get a response?