Jump to content
Teddy B

Here's Just A Small Sample Of What's Wrong With American Politics

 Share

52 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I don't care for Hillary as a person. I find her power hungry (like Trump) and I don't believe she cares except to be the one who finally puts a woman in the white house. And something obama never did, which many credit as extremely smart, was mention his own race in some victimized "Shouldn't you vote for me, let's prove we're not racist" way. Hillary feels if she loses it's because of sexism. She doesn't believe in the meritocracy of the presidency; she wants her private parts to give her some extra credence at the polls. I'm not a woman but I do believe most women who don't support clinton will find her spokespeople very offensive when they say there is a spot in hell for women who don't support hillary. You can't threaten people for your support. It's desperate and a huge turn off. It's a terrible tactical error.

if obama had done such a thing, he never would have gotten elected. there's a double standard for racial minorities and there is also a double standard for women - that's for certain, but the trick is acting like the double standard doesn't exist/hasn't affected you. it's about keeping the elephant in the room a non-issue. she's already carrying the damn elephant around on a campaign sign and threatening voters with it. i find it extremely offensive when i see comments from older women (who don't loathe hillary at all) making comments about hillary being the only reasonable choice for progressive women, or that anyone who supports bernie is delusional. hell, anyone that vigorously supports any candidate is delusional if they think their vote means anything when it's all said and done. NH super delegates proved that quite nicely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

[...] the fact that some people did support him simply because he's black must be considered [...]

On election night in 2008, a local TV reporterette was on the campus of a historically black university, trying to interview revelers.

Reporterette to one girl: "Why did you vote for Obama?"

Girl (giddily): "Because he black!"

Reporterette: "Was there any additional reason?"

Girl (more giddily): "Because he black!"

The reporterette looked a bit frustrated or crestfallen and turned things back over to the anchor desk.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On election night in 2008, a local TV reporterette was on the campus of a historically black university, trying to interview revelers.

Reporterette to one girl: "Why did you vote for Obama?"

Girl (giddily): "Because he black!"

Reporterette: "Was there any additional reason?"

Girl (more giddily): "Because he black!"

The reporterette looked a bit frustrated or crestfallen and turned things back over to the anchor desk.

sigh x2, considering how many white christian males -knowing or unknowingly- will only support other white christian males..pick up on my bit about the double standard. hold it in the same frame of reference with your 'reporterette' and 'girl' statements.

i mean, assuming she wasn't actually a girl and you're retelling a story of a child who couldn't actually vote anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-3 Visa Country: Indonesia
Timeline

i think democrats/liberals forget just how much the democratic party are a part of 'the establishment' as republicans. considering hillary is a woman, imo she has had to make even more concessions to establishment/money over the course of her career than a male candidate would have. no matter how progressive she might have been started out, she definitely isn't anywhere close to fitting in as progressive. the fact that she doesn't seem to catch this, makes it even more obvious.

i don't get that either. republicans (especially the older ones) HATE her. bernie appeals to folks across the board because he has actual plans that he's spelled out - trump? he's got nothing. seems like hillary is just running damage control.

She's probably just sleeping with them. That's how all women get ahead right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Actor, actress; tiger, tigress; murderer, murderess; reporter, reportress. Grammatical error noted, with apologies.

Young female college student = coed.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Young female college student = coed.

see i never would have seen that one coming considering you made a point to type "because he black" twice, firmly casting our young female college student in a very young, uneducated light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

On election night in 2008, a local TV reporterette was on the campus of a historically black university, trying to interview revelers.

Reporterette to one girl: "Why did you vote for Obama?"

Girl (giddily): "Because he black!"

Reporterette: "Was there any additional reason?"

Girl (more giddily): "Because he black!"

The reporterette looked a bit frustrated or crestfallen and turned things back over to the anchor desk.

It seems some people like to disregard his half white.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She's probably just sleeping with them. That's how all women get ahead right?

is she ahead? her crotch must not be working right. sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

you made a point to type "because he black" twice, firmly casting our young female college student in a very young, uneducated light.

Because it was a direct, verbatim quote twice, twice casting the young female college student in a very young, uneducated light in your direct, verbatim, judgmental words.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it was a direct, verbatim quote twice, twice casting the young female college student in a very young, uneducated light in your direct, verbatim, judgmental words.

my bad, if you'd provided a link to the verbatim quote i would have approached it as such, instead i viewed it as a simple story more akin to the creative writing sort as opposed to the factual writing sort.

but i get it, all direct verbatim quotes you're referencing can easily be found by going to youtube and searching 'free stuff obama' - a plethora of veiled racism awaits!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Go back and find the 2008 election-night news archives for whatever local station it was, and you'll then have your source.

And belay implying racism when none exists here. Sometimes, words mean exactly and only what they overtly say, with no agenda behind them, and this is one of those times.

Perhaps a helpful link: http://www.visajourney.com/content/terms

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go back and find the 2008 election-night news archives for whatever local station it was, and you'll then have your source.

And belay implying racism when none exists here. Sometimes, words mean exactly and only what they overtly say, with no agenda behind them, and this is one of those times.

Perhaps a helpful link: http://www.visajourney.com/content/terms

maybe you should go back and read what i said. go to you tube and search 'free stuff obama' and you'll see racism. why so defensive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

but i get it, all direct verbatim quotes you're referencing can easily be found by going to youtube and searching 'free stuff obama' - a plethora of veiled racism awaits!

As though I had suggested this. Not interested in plethoras or paucities of veiled or overt racism on youtube or anywhere else.

If you wish to refute the point that some people voted for Obama because of his race -- thus somewhat re-railing this thread -- then please do so.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand women supporting Hillary at all. Here we have a woman who's husband could not keep his hands off other women. Like an idiot, she backs him, doesn't kick his ####### to the curb, blames the other women in spite of his bare faced lying about his behavior. Then she sets off on a course to do everything she could to discredit any of Bill's girls, and publicly and professional ruin them. Nothing to do at all with him being a creep.

And she's meant to be FOR women? More than any other candidate Dem or Republican because she is a woman herself?

I would like to think, although I expect to be very disappointed, that the people of this country would not elect as president a person who had a long history of lying, concealment, and flagrant disregard for the law. And who is married to Bill. Because he is a slime ball.

I can explain it to you. But I can't understand it for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As though I had suggested this. Not interested in plethoras or paucities of veiled or overt racism on youtube or anywhere else.

If you wish to refute the point that some people voted for Obama because of his race -- thus somewhat re-railing this thread -- then please do so.

hey,you're the one going on about verbatim and not leaving a link. doesn't really matter what you're interested in, i made the association because you left out specifics.

re-railing the thread? dear - it wasn't derailed until you decided to tell me to only post what you're interested in :content:, racism is right in line with voting in line with your own race which i do believe is 'just a small sample of what's wrong with american politics"

you could just delete my posts since they're uninteresting and unbecoming to you, idgaf. i still see what i see in your post. i still make the association. not much you can do about it.

Edited by elitesthuglib
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...