Boiler

You need evidence, a Lawyer can not make that up, a Lawyer may suggest ways of acquiring it.

Approved before it retrogressed is more likely.

You show SF as your location, the classic California case is Kumar vs Kumar, worth a read: https://casetext.com/case/kumar-v-kumar-in-re-kumar

I forgot to mention that F2a is retrogressed so quite a desperate plan, but does not make my top 10 of odd stuff.

Well they will both be Visiting, I am not sure how a Court will deem that they can claim Georgia Jurisdiction, now if somebody for example entered the US as a tourist and decided to stay then at some point they are resident for State issues, not sure when that is. If it was that easy well lots of people would do it, get those US Court settlements!

I have seen this a few times, now admittedly not when someone has gone out and stated that they divorced for this reason, and I was sort of assuming nobody would come out and state this . We reconciled etc. Much more common is when people delay getting married, and of course the big no no those who forget they are married and then want to sponsor their spouse, now those do not end well.

Do not see that working

You could say they do, but there are far too many women or too few men.

That is only 34 years, I agree with everyone else, quite normal.

Austen's books only covered a small strata of society, what may be called the 1% in current terminology. Actually very few were in desperate circumstances relative to the general population. I just find it interesting that despite the best attempts some innate factors do not change, so there is an inevitable clash. Obviously the discussion here is about the norm, I would never suggest it applies to everyone, very little does. The story was from the Guardian, super Progressive, I often see this contradiction, is this not what you wanted?, well of course there are other impacts. I could fill this thread with supportive Tik Tok videos. And of course numerous studies from Dating Apps. I am more interested in the well I was going to call them side effects but maybe they will be seen as major effects in the future. There are always consequences and this is unchartered territory, how those consequences will pan out, there have been surprises, more to come.

In the vast majority of cases there are no other proofs. I can think of cases where there will be proofs, for example you are going for Medical treatment and need to show the medical documents and evidence you can pay for treatment. Business trip maybe might have specific documents. They do not ask for documents at the time of the interview usually as they are not relevant and/or impossible to substantiate in the context of a B interview. If there was some magic additional information the sensible place to ask for it is in the DS 160.

I seem to remember someone found that Classical music worked well.

I think I was asked one question.

If I said it would not work presumably you would ask me why.

Why would USCIS have a reference for this situation? Presumably the Lawyer explained the reasoning, quoted USCIS regulations as to why this would be an issue.

Yes

I think they are getting a lot of TCNs

We live in interesting times, these things do not happen in a vacuum. To use a favourite term - Intersectionality.

My main issue is that the weird rule about it not being counted in bankruptcy, make it make sense.

Jane died you, cancer I think and seemed to have suitors, seems the major one had no money and nor did she. So twas never to be.

Meanwhile: Taylor Swift, ‘Barbie’ and Beyoncé are unleashing the spending power of women “I think what we’re seeing right now is that women are not to be underestimated. They lift up economies and that impact is not to be overlooked,” said Kristina Chiapetta, executive strategy director at Landor & Fitch. “But brands haven’t been talking to them in their language for a really long time.” That oft-unspoken language: authenticity and empowerment. https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/09/economy/barbie-taylor-swift-beyonce-economic-impact/index.html

Does not matter of it sits with NVC or the Consulate.

I have come across people who have studied in the US for many many years waiting.

I prefer using you US address but that has gone by. It is up to the Consulate to determine if what you have done is enough.