Brad and Vika

no new video from bin laden saying the US missed either....

Locked for review

You've already filed the petition. The CO is not concerned about evidence of meeting. USCIS will adjudicate that based on primary evidence. Photos are secondary evidence of meeting. For USCIS or the Consulate, I recommend printing multiple photos per page, in color, on plain white paper. You may then add any date or other information you think may be helpful. If the photos are not already showing an interior date, that's fine.

Open and frank discussion of such matters is critical. I usually don't comment on Pre-nuptual agreement threads.
If the situation is that the person wanting the agreement is thinking, "I really love my future spouse and have confidence in our relationship but I also understand that even in the best of situations, many couples divorce after a short time. If this happens, I want to treat this person fairly but do not want to lose half of everything I've worked for, in the event the marriage lasts only a short time." then the other party will want to carefully evaluate the actual agreement to see if they think it's fair, under the circumstances. If not, perhaps you suggest changes.
It's all highly unromantic and depending on a person's own frame of reference, they can be quite discouraged by such a development. At the same time, there are practical matters to consider in any plan to marry.

Locked for review

Visa Journey is a privately owned website not affiliated with any government agency or any official or professional immigration service. It was originally started by a group of individuals who were going through their own immigration journeys and became more 'formalized' as the site grew in popularity. Visa Journey has continued as a useful experience-based immigration support site even though the original members have now completed their own immigration journeys. Many long time members have also completed their immigration journeys but because they know how useful this site is to those who are trying to navigate the sometimes murky waters of the immigration processes, they too stay to offer others the benefit of their knowledge and experience.

Yeah, but bible story movie clips creep me out. Not to mention some of the other stuff

Sorry about the all-caps, but this has to do with the +1, si man:
A MATHEMATICIAN, A BIOLOGIST, & A PHYSICIST ARE SITTING IN A STREET CAFE, WATCHING PEOPLE GOING INTO & COMING OUT OF THE HOUSE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET.
FIRST, THEY SEE 2 PEOPLE GOING INTO THE HOUSE. AFTER A WHILE, THEY NOTICE 3 PEOPLE COMING OUT OF THE HOUSE.
THE BIOLOGIST SAYS, "THEY HAVE REPRODUCED."
THE PHYSICIST SAYS, "THE MEASUREMENT WASN'T ACCURATE."
THE MATHEMATICIAN SAYS, "IF NOW EXACTLY ONE PERSON ENTERS THE HOUSE, IT WILL BE EMPTY AGAIN."

Funny. Not very marketable though.
Double secret reported
And Charles IS a mod
Thats it - Union Card revoked.

Because there wasn't. Nothing more than a platform to attack some one (particularly some one who moderates you - and you don't like it).
Who says that? You are the only one making comments like that. Should some one report you, or just start a thread complaining about what a terrible misogynist you are? Do you seriously think this about American women?
And furthermore, eekee actually got the joke and was not bothered a bit. Any one on VJ who acknowledges that men are visual/tactile creatures are sure to get into trouble with the facebook posse (unless there is an easier target).
In other words, I am defending YOU from this terrible mod. If you disagree, YOU CAN JUST STAY OUT OF IT.
Because it was exactly that. Creating a thread (instead of the report threatened or PM suggested) was the purpose. This kind of attack is a TOS violation as well. Lisa sent a report hours after she started this thread, when a mod asked her about it. It isn't difficult to see what the real goal is here.

Because there wasn't. Nothing more than a platform to attack some one (particularly some one who moderates you - and you don't like it).
Who says that? You are the only one making comments like that. Should some one report you, or just start a thread complaining about what a terrible misogynist you are? Do you seriously think this about American women?
And furthermore, eekee actually got the joke and was not bothered a bit. Any one on VJ who acknowledges that men are visual/tactile creatures are sure to get into trouble with the facebook posse (unless there is an easier target).
In other words, I am defending YOU from this terrible mod. If you disagree, YOU CAN JUST STAY OUT OF IT.
Because it was exactly that. Creating a thread (instead of the report threatened or PM suggested) was the purpose. This kind of attack is a TOS violation as well. Lisa sent a report hours after she started this thread, when a mod asked her about it. It isn't difficult to see what the real goal is here.

Because there wasn't. Nothing more than a platform to attack some one (particularly some one who moderates you - and you don't like it).
Who says that? You are the only one making comments like that. Should some one report you, or just start a thread complaining about what a terrible misogynist you are? Do you seriously think this about American women?
And furthermore, eekee actually got the joke and was not bothered a bit. Any one on VJ who acknowledges that men are visual/tactile creatures are sure to get into trouble with the facebook posse (unless there is an easier target).
In other words, I am defending YOU from this terrible mod. If you disagree, YOU CAN JUST STAY OUT OF IT.
Because it was exactly that. Creating a thread (instead of the report threatened or PM suggested) was the purpose. This kind of attack is a TOS violation as well. Lisa sent a report hours after she started this thread, when a mod asked her about it. It isn't difficult to see what the real goal is here.

Heaven forbid we lower teen pregnancy and STD rates by advocating a balanced approach to sexual health and making sure that if teenagers are going to be having sex (and they will), that they go about in the safest, healthiest way possible. We can't have THAT. Yes, preserving abstinence-only sex "education" is certainly a top priority.
I don't see why sexual practices would be a part of a course on understanding the history of homosexuality in America. You can learn about Stonewall and Harvey Milk and ACT UP and why they are/were significant without needing a diagram of how gay sex works. Do you go into Albert Einstein's numerous extramarital affairs when discussing the Theory of Relativity?

If you have a problem with things people say, perhaps you're better off sending a pm, rather than posting it in a forum where they will only bother to look if they were woken up at 5am and can't fall back asleep.

We, who are married and engaged to RUB women, would like to sincerely thank those who aren't, such as /, Capn Hammer, The Dude and others, for watching over us and making sure we are well behaved and our robotic wives are oiled and kept fully charged.
And also I will add this note from the site description of this forum...
Regional Discussion
This Forum is dedicated to discussion on the major regions around the world. Topics of discussion may include travel, moving, what to eat and any other experience you may wish to share or inquire about. Have fun!
I see that Darnell can read and interpret quite well and was a fine choice for an organizer as this would seem to be a prerequisite.
Excuse me, while I have fun.

Excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse ME, mystery jerk "\"! Darnell, whoever he is, most likely is taking care of more important things.

Again, the poster made the point re: feminist v. realist. Would you like that member banned from VJ as well?
It reads to me that both the poster and Brad were speaking with tongue in cheek.

Even though I "only" had to wait 6 months, I remember thinking it was "too fast". There was SO much to do to prepare for her and the children and I was not ready (completely) As hard as I tried and as much as we had prepared, there was a LOT more to do when she got here.
I forgot about the waiting almost immediately.
I can also say it has been at the top of great things in my life and I never look back.

I was noting that once again the US media is promoting ignorance of the world and encouraging the idea that US law applies overseas
The US is famous for it’s isolationism which used to be a national policy and kept it out of both world wars
This insularity breeds ignorance of world affairs and is encouraged by the media in order to increase ratings by presenting sensationalised nonsense as fact. They not only do not inform, but they deliberately misinform which does the American public no favors
I am inviting discussion on this

He's joking about her losing her feminist union card. And the poster was putting that out there as well (I'm a feminist, but also a realist). Where is there anything offensive or even close to a TOS violation?

I don't see that as Brad mocking American women. I see that as Brad mocking certain female members of VJ who tend to be vigilant about misogyny in the RUB forum.

I see nothing done unacceptably by Brad

Brad said nothing or did anything wrong. You on the other hand seem too touchy to be getting into any discussions and maybe should be banned from any discussions. You also a few times asked someone what they meant so maybe the problem is you.

Fraud and profiting by planning to divorce even before you say 'I do' is not unique to any nationality. I have the 'ex-from-hell' to prove it. The statistics I have seen on international relationships are better than 'domestic' marriages. No guarantees with either! As with anything in life it is 'buyer beware'.