Jump to content

SalishSea

Members
  • Posts

    18,011
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    79

Everything posted by SalishSea

  1. It will take longer than two years- possibly 4-5 (longer if you’re Pakistani) And a visitor visa is unlikely to be approved.
  2. I think it won’t be difficult to do, since it seems like Manila has quite the interview queue.
  3. Exactly, and you've been given good advice in this thread.
  4. Not if you don’t live in the US.
  5. I don't think it is a big deal, but you could try submitting unsolicited evidence in the form of a correction to the Laguna Niguel address. We submitted a much more significant piece of evidence, and it was included with our case. I would just write a letter with "to whom it may concern", and the page in question with the corrected date highlighted. Good luck.
  6. Do not even think of lying to the consular officer.
  7. It may be. But if it is not, it doesn't mean the visa will not be issued.
  8. How will you be eligible for naturalization in three years?
  9. Yes
  10. Was your divorce decree included in the original I-129F packet?
  11. Hint: there will be a similar thread/group for others, like you, who are waiting for approval. Just have a look on the K-1 forums and I’m sure you’ll find it!
  12. And while you’re having these tantrums about how victimized you feel, you are not even acknowledging the good advice and solutions you’re getting in this thread. Makes people think you just want to whine and be entitled, rather than taking action to fix your situation.
  13. It’s likely just not been updated. Sometimes they never are. Your case is in AP.
  14. What do you mean “migrated to live with me”? That is absolutely not allowed on a tourist visa.
  15. Whether he is required to pay for her attorney is not related whatsoever to immigration. It may be ordered by the court overseeing the divorce, yes. But again, not related to immigration. And I agree that she should just cut her losses and go home. She has no path to a green card other than via that marriage.
  16. Do you have an actual question?
  17. No, there is no such requirement. The I-864 he signed is a contract with the United States government to repay them for any means-tested benefits she obtains.
  18. Very unlikely. Has nothing to do with “millions of illegal immigrants crossing the border” and more to do with the behavior of others from your country, deciding not to go back.
  19. It won’t fix the problem of you needing to obtain a corrected certificate of naturalization prior to filing.
  20. The immigrant you want to sponsor has an AWA/CiMT crime history, which makes him inadmissible. And per your other comment, not sure why you think that won’t be an issue for Canada?
  21. Why do you think CBP is in any way part of evaluating public charge risk? That is only done by consular officers.
  22. I feel like maybe there is a language barrier or just a huge void in understanding how things work here, for OP. In the title, the "change country" bit makes me think she believes she can just have him interview for that family preference visa in the US instead.
×
×
  • Create New...