Rc123rc

Short answer is many people file AOS years and years after getting married without a problem. A new medical is required. All the other requirements for AOS are the same. I would expect by now you have lots and lots of relationship/marriage evidence. Right? Stop worrying, stalling and just get it done.

Short answer is many people file AOS years and years after getting married without a problem. A new medical is required. All the other requirements for AOS are the same. I would expect by now you have lots and lots of relationship/marriage evidence. Right? Stop worrying, stalling and just get it done.

I am sorry for your tragic situation. The short answer to your question is no, there is no way you can have your former spouse deported. This topic has come up many many times. You can't have them deported. All you can do is report it. They can attempt a ROC on their own and it seems like they are smart enough to try it with a DV background. Your big mistake was not reporting them for DV the first time they did it and every time after.

I am sorry for your tragic situation. The short answer to your question is no, there is no way you can have your former spouse deported. This topic has come up many many times. You can't have them deported. All you can do is report it. They can attempt a ROC on their own and it seems like they are smart enough to try it with a DV background. Your big mistake was not reporting them for DV the first time they did it and every time after.

I am sorry for your tragic situation. The short answer to your question is no, there is no way you can have your former spouse deported. This topic has come up many many times. You can't have them deported. All you can do is report it. They can attempt a ROC on their own and it seems like they are smart enough to try it with a DV background. Your big mistake was not reporting them for DV the first time they did it and every time after.

I am sorry for your tragic situation. The short answer to your question is no, there is no way you can have your former spouse deported. This topic has come up many many times. You can't have them deported. All you can do is report it. They can attempt a ROC on their own and it seems like they are smart enough to try it with a DV background. Your big mistake was not reporting them for DV the first time they did it and every time after.

Weeks? I would say a year with multiple visits to each other. I know that is not what you wanted to hear but please read other threads that talk about short time relationships. We all want to be with our fiancee's or spouses as quickly as possible but we all have to go through the same process and wait. The average time for a K-1 Visa is 6-8 months. A CR-1 is a year. You can file a K-1 one now since you are both free to marry. Your other thread seems like she is not a USC but a LPR with a green card. If she is not a USC then you can't file a K-1.
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/free-books/fiance-marriage-visa-book/chapter6-1.html

Weeks? I would say a year with multiple visits to each other. I know that is not what you wanted to hear but please read other threads that talk about short time relationships. We all want to be with our fiancee's or spouses as quickly as possible but we all have to go through the same process and wait. The average time for a K-1 Visa is 6-8 months. A CR-1 is a year. You can file a K-1 one now since you are both free to marry. Your other thread seems like she is not a USC but a LPR with a green card. If she is not a USC then you can't file a K-1.
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/free-books/fiance-marriage-visa-book/chapter6-1.html

OK, yes. I was brain dead and missed the second part. The divorce in August 2016 is a huge problem. I agree with you.

I think he would be liable.....
If it's a household and they share expenses.....if she has to take away from what she pays in the house to pay back money then she's making husband have to pick up that slack.
Honestly this can strain the already strained marriage.

Correct. However, forcing a spouse to take on an unnecessary financial and emotional burden is also not good. They are a married couple on opposite sides of the issue. As an example, a husband buys a $60,000 car with a 6 year loan over the objections of the wife that creates a huge financial burden and lowers the couples' quality of life. Should the wife be OK with this?. Bringing a sister into the country does not stop with the arrival. It keeps going on for years and years. I suggest they seek some serious counseling about this. I'm not going to make a judgement as to why the husband is refusing. We don't know anything about the background of this story. We're not family counseling.

Correct. However, forcing a spouse to take on an unnecessary financial and emotional burden is also not good. They are a married couple on opposite sides of the issue. As an example, a husband buys a $60,000 car with a 6 year loan over the objections of the wife that creates a huge financial burden and lowers the couples' quality of life. Should the wife be OK with this?. Bringing a sister into the country does not stop with the arrival. It keeps going on for years and years. I suggest they seek some serious counseling about this. I'm not going to make a judgement as to why the husband is refusing. We don't know anything about the background of this story. We're not family counseling.

Correct. However, forcing a spouse to take on an unnecessary financial and emotional burden is also not good. They are a married couple on opposite sides of the issue. As an example, a husband buys a $60,000 car with a 6 year loan over the objections of the wife that creates a huge financial burden and lowers the couples' quality of life. Should the wife be OK with this?. Bringing a sister into the country does not stop with the arrival. It keeps going on for years and years. I suggest they seek some serious counseling about this. I'm not going to make a judgement as to why the husband is refusing. We don't know anything about the background of this story. We're not family counseling.

Correct. However, forcing a spouse to take on an unnecessary financial and emotional burden is also not good. They are a married couple on opposite sides of the issue. As an example, a husband buys a $60,000 car with a 6 year loan over the objections of the wife that creates a huge financial burden and lowers the couples' quality of life. Should the wife be OK with this?. Bringing a sister into the country does not stop with the arrival. It keeps going on for years and years. I suggest they seek some serious counseling about this. I'm not going to make a judgement as to why the husband is refusing. We don't know anything about the background of this story. We're not family counseling.

Correct. However, forcing a spouse to take on an unnecessary financial and emotional burden is also not good. They are a married couple on opposite sides of the issue. As an example, a husband buys a $60,000 car with a 6 year loan over the objections of the wife that creates a huge financial burden and lowers the couples' quality of life. Should the wife be OK with this?. Bringing a sister into the country does not stop with the arrival. It keeps going on for years and years. I suggest they seek some serious counseling about this. I'm not going to make a judgement as to why the husband is refusing. We don't know anything about the background of this story. We're not family counseling.

Let's go back to beginning. Who is the USC? Is a petition even doable? Ummm... divorce him and file the petition? I think everyone needs to back up and rethink this. There are two issues.
1st. Can the wife file the petition? Maybe. Do we know for sure? Is it her right to do so if she can legally and wants to? Yup. Absolutely. The husband has no say.
2nd. Does the husband have to give his support? Nope. He doesn't have to have anything to do with it if he doesn't want to.

Forcing another person to not do a thing they want to do is abuse.

Did you take into consideration that since you guys got your NOA2 in August 22. That by the time of the trip your petition be at the embassy and your fiancé need to be there preparing the interview and the medical?
Probably he will start with that by the end of September.

You are not listening. If she was legally granted US citizenship, she doesn't loose that through divorce. Get your facts straight before you embark on an immigration journey. Find out if she ever got US citizenship or what her actual resident status is like. This is gonna be critical to your potential visa.

He has access to a computer, he can look up himself instead of just repeating tosh on here.

I see 3 scenarios here:
1. She has very bad English skills and doesn't know what she's talking about
2. She's naive and believed lies her ex husband told her about her immigration status
3. She is lying to you

Again, your girlfriend could not have:
1. Entered the US and gained citizenship after only 2 years.
2. Been a US citizen and as part of the divorce decree have had her citizenship revoked.
3. Been a citizen who was then "demoted" to a permanent resident under some nonexistent Michigan state divorce law.
4. Applied to "reinstate" her citizenship now that the divorce is over.
The 4 situations above did not happen. Not even one of them is possible. They did not happen in a row and not one of them happened on its own. This is not want you want to hear but your girlfriend is lying to you she insists this is true. Therefore I would:
A. Think twice about continuing a relationship without someone who is untruthful about her immigration status.
B. Demand the real story from her.
C. Think twice about marrying and trying to immigrate via someone who is lying about their immigration status.
D. Stop referring to her as your "US citizen" girlfriend.
If I were you. I would start at "B".

You're fiance is going to have to tell the truth. I know you think it's a risk.. It is, considering that he's visiting you and bringing his children. This is why they tell you, and even state in writing, that your fiance should not or cannot come to the United States during the K-1 visa process.

It is actually $985 plus $85 biometrics adding to $1070 so now will be $1040 plus biometric fee
the public had until July 5, 2016 to comment so now they will take all comments and informaiton and decide when and what increases to make

He will be required to do a DNA test for both children. In JA, without the mother's consent, they cannot immigrate. That includes permission from the absent mother.