Dem leaders signal they won’t accept Trump acquittal as legitimate

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

I am afraid one side might not accept the outcome of the election 

 

Didn't they call a bunch of witness and present evidence in the house 

 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dem-leaders-signal-they-wont-accept-trump-acquittal-as-legitimate

[Dashinka 23,243]

22 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I am afraid one side might not accept the outcome of the election 

 

Didn't they call a bunch of witness and present evidence in the house 

 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dem-leaders-signal-they-wont-accept-trump-acquittal-as-legitimate

Everything is being thrown out there today.  We really see the ends the Democrats will go trying to Thomas/Kavanaugh Trump today, and see how joined at the hip the Democrat Party is to the mainstream media.  What do we have today, there is a 30 year old stained dress, and more of Bolton’s book being leaked so far.  The Dems decrying a potential partisan end to this trial (who knows, maybe a few Dems will join the GOP to acquit) is simply laughable considering their process in the House.

 

 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

10 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Everything is being thrown out there today.  We really see the ends the Democrats will go trying to Thomas/Kavanaugh Trump today, and see how joined at the hip the Democrat Party is to the mainstream media.  What do we have today, there is a 30 year old stained dress, and more of Bolton’s book being leaked so far.  The Dems decrying a potential partisan end to this trial (who knows, maybe a few Dems will join the GOP to acquit) is simply laughable considering their process in the House.

 

 

I haven't watched any of it at all, except the sound bite someone posted here of Nadler jumping in front of Schiff to close.  And even that bite was all about him jumping in, didn't include his closing remarks.

[Dashinka 23,243]

4 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

I haven't watched any of it at all, except the sound bite someone posted here of Nadler jumping in front of Schiff to close.  And even that bite was all about him jumping in, didn't include his closing remarks.

Can you say circus?

[Dashinka 23,243]

9 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

I haven't watched any of it at all, except the sound bite someone posted here of Nadler jumping in front of Schiff to close.  And even that bite was all about him jumping in, didn't include his closing remarks.

Well, your Senator seems to be against witnesses.

 

Breaking News

GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski to Oppose Motion To Allow New Witnesses and Documents in Impeachment Trial

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/gop-senators-appear-likely-to-block-witnesses-in-impeachment-trial-11580466602?mod=breakingnews

[90DayFinancier 910]

The fact will remain: no evidence and no witnesses were presented. Not one witness was called that will rebut what Bolton and Parnas claimed.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

Just now, 90DayFinancier said:

The fact will remain: no evidence and no witnesses were presented. Not one witness was called that will rebut what Bolton and Parnas claimed.

there was over 100 hours of witnesses in the house hand picked by the dems 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

28 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

there was over 100 hours of witnesses in the house hand picked by the dems 

And nothing but PRESUMPTIONS and CONJECTURE came out of that, If I understand the somber, democratic process correctly?  Feel free, anyone, to post here a crime that was committed.  I'll stand right over here >>>>>

 

and wait patiently.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

35 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

The fact will remain: no evidence and no witnesses were presented. Not one witness was called that will rebut what Bolton and Parnas claimed.

You DO realize why, right?  You can't present something that does not exist IRL (except in the minds of a few deranged souls who whip each other into a frenzy).  

[Dashinka 23,243]

38 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

The fact will remain: no evidence and no witnesses were presented. Not one witness was called that will rebut what Bolton and Parnas claimed.

Didn’t Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler have a whole bunch of evidence and testimony they took or created in the House?  Heck, I heard Schiff, Nadler and Queen Nancy say several times before the Senate trial began that they had an open and shut case.  What gives?

[Dashinka 23,243]

4 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

You DO realize why, right?  You can't present something that does not exist IRL (except in the minds of a few deranged souls who whip each other into a frenzy).  

I am really starting to think the Schiff is not right in the head.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

38 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I am really starting to think the Schiff is not right in the head.

Schiff isn't the only one (though his crazy eyes have always made me uncomfortable).  We have seen it much closer to home as well.

[Boiler 43,433]

[Neonred 3,446]

6 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I am afraid one side might not accept the outcome of the election 

 

Didn't they call a bunch of witness and present evidence in the house 

 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dem-leaders-signal-they-wont-accept-trump-acquittal-as-legitimate

No problem.  Dems have several more months to whip up more articles of impeachment. 

[Dashinka 23,243]

5 minutes ago, Neonred said:

No problem.  Dems have several more months to whip up more articles of impeachment. 

And Adam Schiff has a secret lair in the basement of the Capitol.