Jump to content
Voice of Reason

Beto O'Rourke says women should be able to choose abortion even the day before birth

 Share

78 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ALFKAD said:

69950526_2496708653880368_23340982547293

This was interesting though: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheseFuckingAccounts/comments/d3r00g/how_right_wing_garbage_is_made_on_reddit/ (Apologies for the swear in the link)

 

I showed this to my fiance and he laughed so hard he started choking. Oh wait, his first reaction before laughing was "wut." Then after he calmed down he asked me, "sweetheart, do you want to have my abortion?" 

 

Please! :lol:  This was too obvious to be real.

 

2 hours ago, ALFKAD said:

Tomato/potato

Buden/Beto... both are dumb bums

 

Doesn't matter how rare the occurrence is.  Do you agree with Beto's claim that he will support abortion up until the moment of birth?  I guess what I'm trying to ascertain is... how late into a pregnancy do you think abortions should be performed?  Not talking about sick babies or at-risk mothers here.  Just choosing abortion as a means of birth control.

I tend to think he misspoke, or he was trying to be overly inclusive to cover those very rare situations I was speaking of. I really don't care much about Beto. But I guess you are talking about so called "elective" abortions. I am in line with what the law is or what I understand the law to be, so that's viability, generally around 24 weeks. I don't judge women on why they choose to have a termination -- it is a private health matter. I had my own reasons for my own termination, and it was very, VERY early on. You might call it birth control, but it was a difficult decision to make. It was also my private decision to make. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Double post (oops).

 

But now that I'm here editing my double post -- is it possible that someone has a fetish about this? Sure, why not. But at the same time, people can have really elaborate fetishes and they never act on them, thought they may post about them online. I think about that cannibal cop guy, who never ate anyone but engaged in a LOT of online role play. His conviction was overturned. These people are just getting excited talking about this. Pregnancy is a real fetish! (I mean, yuck. Sorry to be judgey to anyone out there on here who thinks it's hot! :lol:)

Edited by laylalex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
12 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

the little catch phrase  ... dumb bum dumb bum.

This is the rhythmic/musical accompaniment to his theme chant.  Onomatopoeia*, if one prefers.

 

*English-only outside the regional forums!!!  Reported!!!!!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...