Ex-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen jailed for three years

[refugee 169]

2 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

It would be a good start to at least state the alleged crime or offense Trump is supposedly guilty of. We can worry about evidence if we can actually get past that point. By the way Russian collusion is not a crime nor is it an impeachable offense assuming Trump was actually guilty of it which evidence has yet to be presented that he is.

we pre-covered most of that for you

 

fake news, deep state, everyone does it, where is your proof?, it's a civil matter, activist judge, witch hunt, axe to grind, what about Hillary?,what about Bill?,never met him, this totally clears him, peanut stuff, it's not what you think it is actually a very good thing, everyone is saying, Very smart people think this is a good thing you should too, Maxine Waters is not very smart, even it's a crime it's not a high crime, It's like jaywalking, the Truth is not the Truth, Alternative facts, no collusion, collusion illusion, There's no allegation of wrongdoing by the president in the government's charges, a sitting president cannot be indicted , whataboutwhataboutwhatabout, time to wrap it up...I am sure I am missing some sort of  canard.

[JimandChristy 1,689]

Now don't forget we've also got a Russian spy who pled guilty to conspiracy and infiltrating the NRA. Everything I mean everything links back to Mango. I think we're just seeing the tip of the iceberg here. I can not only see Mango being removed as President in disgrace but he'll watch his empire crumble and be in prison for the rest of his life.

[jg121783 3,907]

7 minutes ago, refugee said:

I suppose you want proof of guilt to have Prosecutors start investigation.

The investigation has been going on for 2+ years. They don't need evidence to start an investigation only probable cause of a crime which they didn't even have (Russian collusion is not a crime). In order to prosecute they do need evidence and that is why Trump hasn't been prosecuted and never will be. By the way a sitting president can only be "prosecuted" by the Senate. Not some out of control prosecutor with a political agenda. I'll ask the same question I have asked so many times here and have yet to get a direct answer. What crime or impeachable offense is Trump guilty of and what evidence backs this up?

 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

16 minutes ago, refugee said:

I suppose you want proof of guilt to have Prosecutors start investigation.

I’ll just be satisfied with INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.  You know, the cornerstone of our justice system?  

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

14 minutes ago, refugee said:

we pre-covered most of that for you

 

fake news, deep state, everyone does it, where is your proof?, it's a civil matter, activist judge, witch hunt, axe to grind, what about Hillary?,what about Bill?,never met him, this totally clears him, peanut stuff, it's not what you think it is actually a very good thing, everyone is saying, Very smart people think this is a good thing you should too, Maxine Waters is not very smart, even it's a crime it's not a high crime, It's like jaywalking, the Truth is not the Truth, Alternative facts, no collusion, collusion illusion, There's no allegation of wrongdoing by the president in the government's charges, a sitting president cannot be indicted , whataboutwhataboutwhatabout, time to wrap it up...I am sure I am missing some sort of  canard.

So once again, after several folks have asked you very nicely, you have nothing.  If you have nothing, why post about nothing?

[JimandChristy 1,689]

6 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

I’ll just be satisfied with INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.  You know, the cornerstone of our justice system?  

Aye LOCK HER UP! Didn't stop Mango and his minions.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

3 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

So once again, after several folks have asked you very nicely, you have nothing.  If you have nothing, why post about nothing?

They've never had anything of substance. Just some angry people pouting 2 years after the fact.

 

Trump has proven he can be a tool, he also follows through on campaign processes, I did not vote for him before, I would consider it now

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 minute ago, Randyandyuni said:

They've never had anything of substance. Just some angry people pouting 2 years after the fact.

 

Trump has proven he can be a tool, he also follows through on campaign processes, I did not vote for him before, I would consider it now

That’s likely because you are an open-minded, forward-thinking person, not someone who wants to blame everyone else for their problems.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

2 minutes ago, JimandChristy said:

Aye LOCK HER UP! Didn't stop Mango and his minions.

You know that lesson (Golden rule) is taught in kindergarten, you obviously missed that day in class. You emulate that which you abhor, too funny

[JimandChristy 1,689]

Just now, Randyandyuni said:

They've never had anything of substance. Just some angry people pouting 2 years after the fact.

 

Trump has proven he can be a tool, he also follows through on campaign processes, I did not vote for him before, I would consider it now

Keep putting your head in the sand. This is without a doubt one of the most corrupt campaigns and administrations ever. Numerous indictments and convictions and Mango is at the center of everything.  2 years this investigation has been going on for and Mueller is still prosecuting, shows you how deep the corruption goes. 

[refugee 169]

15 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

The investigation has been going on for 2+ years. They don't need evidence to start an investigation only probable cause of a crime which they didn't even have (Russian collusion is not a crime). In order to prosecute they do need evidence and that is why Trump hasn't been prosecuted and never will be. By the way a sitting president can only be "prosecuted" by the Senate. Not some out of control prosecutor with a political agenda. I'll ask the same question I have asked so many times here and have yet to get a direct answer. What crime or impeachable offense is Trump guilty of and what evidence backs this up?

 

"a sitting president cannot be indicted ",. I had that one.  Thank you for "collusion is not a crime" that is a golden oldie.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

The sand beats your choice for cranial insertion.

 

Perhaps one day you can present something factual

 

 

[refugee 169]

Fox’s Napolitano: We learned today that prosecutors have evidence Trump committed a felony

BY JUSTIN WISE - 12/12/18 04:33 PM EST

 

Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano said the American public "learned" on Wednesday that federal prosecutors have evidence President Trump committed a crime.

"Career prosecutors here in New York have evidence that the president of the United States committed a felony by ordering and paying Michael Cohen to break the law,” Napolitano said while speaking on Fox News. “How do we know that? They told that to the federal judge. Under the rules, they can’t tell that to the federal judge unless they actually have that hardcore evidence. Under the rules, they can’t tell that to the federal judge unless they intend to do something with that evidence."

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/421083-foxs-napolitano-we-learned-today-that-prosecutors-have-evidence-trump

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

6 minutes ago, refugee said:

Fox’s Napolitano: We learned today that prosecutors have evidence Trump committed a felony

BY JUSTIN WISE - 12/12/18 04:33 PM EST

 

Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano said the American public "learned" on Wednesday that federal prosecutors have evidence President Trump committed a crime.

"Career prosecutors here in New York have evidence that the president of the United States committed a felony by ordering and paying Michael Cohen to break the law,” Napolitano said while speaking on Fox News. “How do we know that? They told that to the federal judge. Under the rules, they can’t tell that to the federal judge unless they actually have that hardcore evidence. Under the rules, they can’t tell that to the federal judge unless they intend to do something with that evidence."

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/421083-foxs-napolitano-we-learned-today-that-prosecutors-have-evidence-trump

I thought fox was faux news ?

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 minute ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I thought fox was faux news ?

Have heard it here MANY times.  In fact, I think Jim told us just a few hours ago, maybe a day?