Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Bill & Katya

Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

6 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Remind me, who was colluding with the Russians and others to affect an election?

 

Congressional investigators have confirmed that a top FBI official met with Democratic Party lawyers to talk about allegations of Donald Trump-Russia collusion weeks before the 2016 election, and before the bureau secured a search warrant targeting Trump’s campaign.

Former FBI general counsel James Baker met during the 2016 season with at least one attorney from Perkins Coie, the Democratic National Committee’s private law firm.

That’s the firm used by the DNC and Hillary  campaign to secretly pay research firm Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence operative, to compile a dossier of uncorroborated raw intelligence alleging Trump and Moscow were colluding to hijack the presidential election.

The dossier, though mostly unverified, was then used by the FBI as the main evidence seeking a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant targeting the Trump campaign in the final days of the campaign.

The revelation was confirmed both in contemporaneous evidence and testimony secured by a joint investigation by Republicans on the House Judiciary and Government Oversight committees, my source tells me.

It means the FBI had good reason to suspect the dossier was connected to the DNC’s main law firm and was the product of a Democratic opposition-research effort to defeat Trump — yet failed to disclose that information to the FISA court in October 2016, when the bureau applied for a FISA warrant to surveil Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

“This is a bombshell that unequivocally shows the real collusion was between the FBI and Donald Trump’s opposition — the DNC, Hillary and a Trump-hating British intel officer — to hijack the election, rather than some conspiracy between Putin and Trump,” a knowledgeable source told me.

 

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/409817-russia-collusion-bombshell-dnc-lawyers-met-with-fbi-on-dossier-before

 

 

 

 


Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This makes Watergate look like Jaywalking. It should shake the deep state at the very foundation of our democracy to its core. The DNC basically used the FBI to spy on the opposing camapain

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish there was a "SMH" button.....good lord!  IDK if I should laugh or cry!  I shouldn't be shocked - the truth always comes out eventually, but the lengths the Left has gone to - the brutally apparent mission to destroy the rule of law that frames our Nation's strength and the Constitution upon which it's founded is heartbreaking, enraging, disgusting, and even pathetic.  I know that the Left and Right are both wings of the same bird (I tend to vote Libertarian or Constitution party) but dayum! I really truly hope that all of this serves to wake up America to the importance of being active in the political process.  At the end of the day, it's on us, the US Citizen.  The mess in Congress is our fault.  It's our responsibility to limit the terms with our votes each cycle.  It's our responsibility to be informed and involved.  I'd love nothing more than to see a whole string of candidates hit the ballots who are simply "average Americans" - Housewives, Small Business Owners, heck - even retail clerks!  I don't care if they don't have a lick of "legal" or "political" experience.  I do think intelligence does matter, and basic common sense.  If the laws can't be understood fully by an average intelligent American, then they shouldn't even be passed. 

 

The "Lords/Ladies/Barons/Baronesses" who are "grooming their offspring to follow in their footsteps and take on the family legacy" that our "Congress" has become can be overthrown.  Give me the owner of the local hardware store, who can confidently speak his mind and express plain old fashioned sense any day over some rich, Ivy League law school candidate any day of the week!  Heck - they could even be running on a more liberal or even Democratic platform!  WE THE PEOPLE are the ONLY ones ultimately responsible for our freedom, our rights, and our governance.  It was fought for, bled for, and handed to us to nurture and uphold.  If we don't wake up to these tactics (again - both parties have well developed histories of being dirty), take our responsibility seriously, and do something about it - we are going to lose it. 

 

I'd even go so far as to say that there is a very well funded agenda (or set of agendas) to see the strength of the independence our democratic republic holds destroyed. I think Obama weakened us horribly and Hillary was supposed to "run the ball" through the end zone until we were "properly subdued" within the more global politic (treaties, trade agreements, UN, etc).  I think Trump threw a wrench in that plan because he's not a "DC Darling" and can't be controlled.  I think the weakness we've seen the Republican members of congress show, the "wishy washy" failure to commit to much of anything is because they have already agreed to be a part of the plan - to play a role that "appears to be" in opposition, but in truth does as little as possible while the Dems resort to outright war on the Constitution.  Someone(s) in rich and powerful places want to see America become a socialist nation.  They want us weak.  Putin wouldn't have colluded with Trump - he knows that we would have been much easier pickings and he'd be much better able to topple us as a super power under Hillary.  I know, I'm sounding all "conspiracy theorist", and no I don't think it's all "Illuminati" (scary "oooooooooohhhh" sound inserted here) or "The Free Masons" or the "EU" or whoever the big name "evils" are.  I don't think it's one singular "organization" with an agenda.  I don't even know how well organized it is.  I think, perhaps, we have something more of a conglomerate of entities or individuals who are doing more of a "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" sort of thing.  Each seeing how their smaller agenda is benefited by supporting the other's - so they each give their little push here, donations there, etc etc until we have the mess we're in now.

 

The Hunger Games series was based on the phrase panem et circenses and sadly, the truth in the phrase is upon us. (the following was taken from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bread_and_circuses)

 

"Bread and circuses" (or bread and games; from Latin: panem et circenses) is a figure of speech, specifically referring to a superficial means of appeasement. As a metonymic, the phrase is attributed to Juvenal, a Roman poet active in the late first and early second century AD — and is used commonly in cultural, particularly political, contexts.

 

In a political context, the phrase means to generate public approval, not by excellence in public service or public policy, but by diversion, distraction or by satisfying the most immediate or base requirements of a populace[1] — by offering a palliative: for example food (bread) or entertainment (circuses).

 

Juvenal, who originated the phrase, used it to decry the selfishness of common people and their neglect of wider concerns.[2][3][4] The phrase implies a population's erosion or ignorance of civic duty as a priority.[5]

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OS, you ought to run, yourself, or at least become a nationally published editorial columnist.

-------

15 minutes ago, OptimusSpice said:

I'd love nothing more than to see a whole string of candidates hit the ballots who are simply "average Americans" - Housewives, Small Business Owners, heck - even retail clerks!  I don't care if they don't have a lick of "legal" or "political" experience.

Uh, we now have Alexandria Ocasio Cortez Veracruz de la Joya Cardinale, or whatever she calls herself. :P 

But seriously, we need more "citizen" representatives, as the Founders conceived them.


06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that this news was suppressed by the Democrat manufactured circus regarding Kavanaugh.  Time for Trump to declassify some documents, the Brits be damned.


Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×