Jump to content

32 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Hey all,

 

Just wanted to post this in the hope it helps someone else not waste as much time at the DMV as i have.

 

I entered the US on a K1 visa back in April. I've had nothing but frustration with the local DMV (Santa Ana). After going down twice (without appointment) and giving up twice because of the monstrous lines. I finally made an appointment which I attended last week. I had heard I would have to wait until I got my EAD to be able to apply for a full Californian DL. I had however, discovered I could apply for a lesser DL in the meantime called an AB 60. So at my appointment I asked if I could apply for the AB 60 and was told my UK passport and SSN wouldn't be enough and it would need to be sent away for 3 months to a year for a 'secondary review'. I thought that cant be right!? After arguing my case and the employee calling 'an expert on this type of case' I got no where and gave up.

 

So, today on the DMV CA website, I found the list of requirements for the AB 60. More in intriguingly, a  list of acceptable Passports that DON'T need a secondary review.

 

Low and behold! The UK Passport and nearly every other country in the world is on the list!!!

 

So annoyed I wasted so much time. Rest assured I will be returning to said DMV with my print out in hand!!!

 

Anyways, long story short...

 

ALL YOU NEED TO APPLY FOR AN AB 60 licence in CA

 

  • Your Passport
  • Your SSN (temporary is fine too)
  • Proof of address (I'm using my SSN letter attached to my card with address on)

 

Here is the full list of requirements on the DMV California website:

 

https://www.dmv.org/ca-california/ab-60-drivers-license.php

 

Also, I'm sure this information is nothing new to some people and there are already posts similar to this BUT, I looked and I couldn't find anything giving me a definite answer.

 

Thanks and hope this helps some of you!

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
Posted

AB-60 is for those who have no legal status in the US, often called "illegals" or "undocumented". You are not undocumented.

 

I would be very, very careful trying to pose as an illegal just to get a DL.. who knows how/if it messes up your future attempts to get a greencard.

K-1: 12-22-2015 - 09-07-2016

AP: 12-20-2016 - 04-07-2017

EAD: 01-18-2017 - 05-30-2017

AOS: 12-20-2016 - 07-26-2017

ROC: 04-22-2019 - 04-22-2020
Naturalization: 05-01-2020 - 03-16-2021

U.S. passport: 03-30-2021 - 05-08-2021

En livstid i krig. Göteborg killed it. Epic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBs3G1PvyfM&ab_channel=Sabaton

 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Scandi said:

AB-60 is for those who have no legal status in the US, often called "illegals" or "undocumented". You are not undocumented.

 

I would be very, very careful trying to pose as an illegal just to get a DL.. who knows how/if it messes up your future attempts to get a greencard.

Miles away from correct my friend! 

 

Firstly yes, you are correct that an illegal immigrant can apply for an AB 60.. but the AB 60 doesn't just serve those with unlawful residence. It can also help people who are inbetween status!

 

Also as for your statement about it messing up a chance of getting a greencard... SERIOUSLY?

 

ill just leave this here... quoted from the DMV website.

 

'To be eligible for a California driver's license under AB-60, you must be at least 16 years old, and be able to provide proof of identityAND California residency.'

 

'By law, no one may discriminate against a holder of an AB-60 license, or use this license to attempt to question the holder's citizenship or immigration status.'

 

Edited by Matt&Savannah
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Nigeria
Timeline
Posted
50 minutes ago, Matt&Savannah said:

Miles away from correct my friend! 

 

Firstly yes, you are correct that an illegal immigrant can apply for an AB 60.. but the AB 60 doesn't just serve those with unlawful residence. It can also help people who are inbetween status!

 

Also as for your statement about it messing up a chance of getting a greencard... SERIOUSLY?

 

ill just leave this here... quoted from the DMV website.

 

'To be eligible for a California driver's license under AB-60, you must be at least 16 years old, and be able to provide proof of identityAND California residency.'

 

'By law, no one may discriminate against a holder of an AB-60 license, or use this license to attempt to question the holder's citizenship or immigration status.'

 

How about those of us coming to California on a Green card?

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
8 hours ago, Abies said:

How about those of us coming to California on a Green card?

Aslong as you have proof of address and SSN you'll be able to apply for a full 'real' CA DL

Posted
11 hours ago, Scandi said:

AB-60 is for those who have no legal status in the US, often called "illegals" or "undocumented". You are not undocumented.

 

I would be very, very careful trying to pose as an illegal just to get a DL.. who knows how/if it messes up your future attempts to get a greencard.

It’s not only for undocumented people. However people may assume you are undocumented if you need to show ID somewhere and you produce an AB60 license. Also note you can’t use it for federal ID (like airplane travel)

10 hours ago, Abies said:

How about those of us coming to California on a Green card?

You’re good to go for a normal license. Look up the “real ID” requirements on the CA DMV website and take with. You’ll basically just need green card, SSN and proof of address if I recall correctly.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
34 minutes ago, SusieQQQ said:

It’s not only for undocumented people. However people may assume you are undocumented if you need to show ID somewhere and you produce an AB60 license. Also note you can’t use it for federal ID (like airplane travel)

 

In no circumstance can an AB 60 be used as ID.. it is purely granted to give someone a right to drive. So you wouldn't be showing it to anyone else but your insurance company and the government. Also, someone assuming you are undocumented DOESN'T make it so!!

 

An argument was made earlier that if you apply for an AB 60 the government might assume you are illegal and deny greencard. Firstly there are laws preventing this. Secondly, RELAX! You Are Legal! You have the paper trail and documentation to prove it!!! 

Posted
1 hour ago, Matt&Savannah said:

In no circumstance can an AB 60 be used as ID.. it is purely granted to give someone a right to drive. So you wouldn't be showing it to anyone else but your insurance company and the government. Also, someone assuming you are undocumented DOESN'T make it so!!

 

An argument was made earlier that if you apply for an AB 60 the government might assume you are illegal and deny greencard. Firstly there are laws preventing this. Secondly, RELAX! You Are Legal! You have the paper trail and documentation to prove it!!! 

And I responded to that last one saying it doesn't "prove" you are undocumented, I agree it's a nonsense argument. 

That said...

Day to day living you may find you are asked to show ID more than you realize. Like purchasing alcohol. Some stores ask when you use credit cards. At a bank. Etc. Assuming people don't go everywhere with their passports, your driver license is what you show. Of course these are not undercover ICE agents looking to arrest people. But some people may feel uncomfortable getting "the look" or whatever, it's just a fair warning. I get people wanting to drive while they're waiting, I also think it's fair to warn them that if they end up showing their license as ID  that people will probably assume they are undocumented, because that is who the vast, vast majority of AB60 licenses are issued to. It may not matter at all /make you feel uncomfortable in downtown San Francisco. It may matter more in some little town in the central valley. 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
23 hours ago, Matt&Savannah said:

'By law, no one may discriminate against a holder of an AB-60 license, or use this license to attempt to question the holder's citizenship or immigration status.'

This might apply to state law, but it wouldn't overrule Federal law (or protocols, or practices).

Would probably be wise to call a couple of CBP ports in the state and ask what they do or presume.

CBP agents can often be in a foul mood and looking to nail somebody.

You don't want a "detention" on your record as you proceed through the immigration process.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
1 hour ago, TBoneTX said:

This might apply to state law, but it wouldn't overrule Federal law (or protocols, or practices).

Would probably be wise to call a couple of CBP ports in the state and ask what they do or presume.

CBP agents can often be in a foul mood and looking to nail somebody.

You don't want a "detention" on your record as you proceed through the immigration process.

Plus of course a law prohibiting it doesn’t necessarily stop it happening...just means you have legal recourse if it does. Could still be a messy process.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

A lot of us here have learned, often the hard way, to treat no part of this process casually.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

  • 2 months later...
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

UPDATE - Just to let anyone who views this post know, I have successfully applied for and passed my driving test. My AB 60 License will be in the mail in 2 weeks. I used a rental car to pass my test, which required me to buy the liability insurance. After a couple of issues with certain DMV staff not knowing the rules I finally got there. Just make sure you read up on your rights and don't let those hard workers at the DMV turn you away! 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Super!  Thanks for your thoughtfulness in returning to post the update.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

Just FYI I was able to get a temporary driving license (not AB60) with just my passport, marriage license, I-767C (for I-485) and a couple of utility bills last year. I am in the San Francisco Bay Area.

 

I did the written test on the same day, and then scheduled a behind-the-wheel a couple of months later.

 

However, I did get a letter from DMV HQ (Sacramento) saying that they were unable to complete my application since I did not provide any proof of legal residency during my initial application in person.

 

Strangely they still let me sit for behind-the-wheel, and I still got my temporary d/l after that. I was told that unless I presented proof of residency, I won't be able to get a full DL/ID. Just so happens that my EAD/AP got approved last week, so I have sent in my approval notice to Sacramento. I've yet to hear back from them.

 

My temporary DL expires next month, so hopefully I receive my full DL from them before then.

TIMELINE FOR AOS from B1/B2 visa

 

05/21/2018 – Sent I-485, I-765 and I-131 packets via Fedex (Chicago Lockbox)
05/23/2018 – Packet delivered to USCIS (0 days).
05/29/2018 – Received text/email notification NOA1 (6 days)
06/08/2018 – Received biometrics appointment letter/I-797C hardcopy in mail (16 days). Priority Date on NOA says 06/01/18.

06/18/2018 – Biometrics done (26 days)

06/21/2018 – Case status changed to "Case is Ready to be scheduled for an interview" (29 days)

06/22/2018 – Courtesy letter (reminder to bring I-693 medical report to interview) received in mail (30 days). Letter dated 06/14/18

 

07/10/2018 – Submitted change of address
07/14/2018 – Email from USCIS confirming successful change of address

 

09/15/2018 – Online status changed to "Approved" for I-765
09/17/2018 - Received I-797 (NOA) hardcopy of approved I-765 in mail

09/18/2018 – Online status changed to "New card is being produced" for I-765

09/26/2018 – Received EAD/AP card in mail. No online or text updates received.

 

09/27/2018 – Applied for SSN at SSA (in person)
10/05/2018 – Received SS card in mail

 

06/25/2019 – Received email notification that case status has changed to "Interview was Scheduled" (400 days)

07/03/2019 – Received hardcopy of notice for interview (note: letter was sent to my old address, and was forwarded to my new address)

07/29/2019 – Interview held @ Sacramento office (1045hrs)
07/29/2019 – Case status changed to "Initial Review" (2100hrs)
07/30/2019 – Case status changed to "Card/Document Production" (0100 hrs)
08/01/2019 – Case status changed to "Card was mailed to me"
08/02/2019 – AOS approval notice received in mail

08/02/2019 – Case status changed to "Card was picked up by USPS"
08/05/2019 – Green Card in hand

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...