25 House Democrats are trying to remove Trump from office under the 25th Amendment

[CaliCat 3,957]

24 minutes ago, Ebunoluwa said:

No, it's not about the election. It is about common decency and it is about respect for the office. It is about standing up and voicing that enough is enough.
It is about being totally embarrassed in front of the International community and being seen as a joke world wide.
It is about a mentally unstable man child with impulse control issues.
 

Being authentic does not mean being offensive. Being a non political, non establishment individual doesn't mean behaving like a narcissistic negative
attention seeker. I hope you can move on from the election song, it is getting old and stale.

 

+100!

 

This has to be the best post of the day, by far.

 

Someone must be able to stand and state the obvious: The emperor has no clothes.

 

 

Edited July 2, 2017 by CaliCat

[JimandChristy 1,689]

17 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

I find it humorous that people are trying to say Trump has a mental disorder and none of them have met or spoke with Trump personally. Even a medical professional would have to meet with him personally to make a proper diagnosis. Some people think they know more than a professional who is trained to diagnose mental disorders I guess.

I think it's very obvious he has a mental disorder. He's proven time and time again he fits the diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder. It's not like he shows glimpses of these behaviors, he consistently shows them. I thought he would stop after the election was over because he was campaigning but he hasn't, he just carried on.

[Dashinka 25,885]

13 minutes ago, JimandChristy said:

I think it's very obvious he has a mental disorder. He's proven time and time again he fits the diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder. It's not like he shows glimpses of these behaviors, he consistently shows them. I thought he would stop after the election was over because he was campaigning but he hasn't, he just carried on.

So we had a choice of a pathological liar which is also a mental disorder and a narcissist.  I will take the latter.

 

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

3 hours ago, jg121783 said:

8 months after the election and the butt hurt on the left still hasn't ended.

After 70 years the president is not going to change. After 4 years the Republicans will kick him to the curb or wreck the Republican  party for a generation. 

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

15 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

So the liberal elite mentality is the definition of sane?  I guess they only have temper tantrums in private.

 

In all honesty I had temper tantrums before. However I never had one in my office or on social media in front of the world to see.
Yes, mature people voice their issues in private, with whomever they have beef with. Not on a playground named Twitter.
Not with asinine tweets but with mature confrontation and communication.
I said the other day this is not WWE and now he has taken it literally into a WWE ring. As I said he is predictable.

I am ashamed of his behavior no matter who wronged him, 2 wrongs don't make a right and I expect much higher ground from a president.
The WWE clip is like a pig gone mad rolling in the mud attacking, hardly anyone's wish for a president.

This is not about him not liking news articles. It's about him responding in a childish manner where his "fight back" is much worse than the
perceived initial offense and it is constant.  He will never KO the press. Not going to happen. The media is an echo, a mirror, what he does will have an echo in the media.
Whatever you call into the woods you will hear come back to you.
It is not about who started it first like a school yard brawl.  It is the president of the United States of America not being so hypersensitive and instead rise above

criticism that every political figure and especially every president before him had to deal with. That is wise, that is class. That is not inciting violence.
That is not bullying. It is being an example and true leader, a role model for our children. Brawling about like a drunken uncle is not respecting the office.
His constant ruffled feathers are a flashing red neon sign in regards to national security matters. He emotes but does not govern, has no diplomacy.
Impulsive, compulsive, obsessive behavior does not belong in the oval office.
I don't need to "know him" face to face to recognize problems in his mentality.
I have researched his past. I am well versed in psychology and as others who are close to him and have known him all his life openly state he has a problem,

I can see plainly that he is not emotionally stable.
If anyone can not recognize this kind of  behavior as being " very off "  then that is naive or willful denial and agenda motivated.
It is setting the bar very low for a president, making excuses for and enabling his sick drunken uncle behavior.

Just hand him another beer then.  Cheers !




 

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

28 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

So we had a choice of a pathological liar which is also a mental disorder and a narcissist.  I will take the latter.

 

Sorry but it is both. One does not negate the other.

[Ebunoluwa 6,136]

1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

In other words it is all about letting the mainstream media do whatever they want with little repercussions.  A lot of people like the fact that Trump is calling out the media for their phony stories no matter what the appearances.  I know, it is beneath the office, well maybe it shouldn't be, and maybe just maybe, this war with the media is what we need to get them back to a non-partisan position.

 

As to this proposal, it will be a tough hill to climb, but by all means climb it.  They will have to pass a law in both houses, then get enough support to over ride a veto before they could even attempt a Section 4 removal and all because Trump fought back against someone who was demeaning him which is something he has done pretty much his entire life, so proving he is unfit mentally to do his duties.  The Constitution doesn't say the president has to be nice to the press.

Yes, we have a free press. No repercussions. Adult conversation would help but no "repercussion". This is not Russia where media is controlled.
You can't bully the media into anything. You will only pour gasoline on a fire.
The constitution does not say he has to be nice ...agreed....but it also does not say you have to bully to reign in the press and fight back like a

toddler throwing a fit in isle 45.
 

[Dashinka 25,885]

1 hour ago, Ebunoluwa said:

Yes, we have a free press. No repercussions. Adult conversation would help but no "repercussion". This is not Russia where media is controlled.
You can't bully the media into anything. You will only pour gasoline on a fire.
The constitution does not say he has to be nice ...agreed....but it also does not say you have to bully to reign in the press and fight back like a

toddler throwing a fit in isle 45.
 

Having a free press does not mean they should not be held accountable and questioned even by elected officials.  The left wing press is full of bullies and so far have not been questioned.  I don't remember Trump ever saying the government needs to control the media.  This whole blow up is over a couple of serial cheaters that somehow have a show on cable news, they lack credibility as much as anyone else in the media.

[Dashinka 25,885]

1 hour ago, Ebunoluwa said:

In all honesty I had temper tantrums before. However I never had one in my office or on social media in front of the world to see.
Yes, mature people voice their issues in private, with whomever they have beef with. Not on a playground named Twitter.
Not with asinine tweets but with mature confrontation and communication.
I said the other day this is not WWE and now he has taken it literally into a WWE ring. As I said he is predictable.

I am ashamed of his behavior no matter who wronged him, 2 wrongs don't make a right and I expect much higher ground from a president.
The WWE clip is like a pig gone mad rolling in the mud attacking, hardly anyone's wish for a president.

This is not about him not liking news articles. It's about him responding in a childish manner where his "fight back" is much worse than the
perceived initial offense and it is constant.  He will never KO the press. Not going to happen. The media is an echo, a mirror, what he does will have an echo in the media.
Whatever you call into the woods you will hear come back to you.
It is not about who started it first like a school yard brawl.  It is the president of the United States of America not being so hypersensitive and instead rise above

criticism that every political figure and especially every president before him had to deal with. That is wise, that is class. That is not inciting violence.
That is not bullying. It is being an example and true leader, a role model for our children. Brawling about like a drunken uncle is not respecting the office.
His constant ruffled feathers are a flashing red neon sign in regards to national security matters. He emotes but does not govern, has no diplomacy.
Impulsive, compulsive, obsessive behavior does not belong in the oval office.
I don't need to "know him" face to face to recognize problems in his mentality.
I have researched his past. I am well versed in psychology and as others who are close to him and have known him all his life openly state he has a problem,

I can see plainly that he is not emotionally stable.
If anyone can not recognize this kind of  behavior as being " very off "  then that is naive or willful denial and agenda motivated.
It is setting the bar very low for a president, making excuses for and enabling his sick drunken uncle behavior.

Just hand him another beer then.  Cheers !




 

The press attacks would not stop even if Trump completely gave up tweeting.  The strategy of the Left and their press allies appears to be very clear in the narratives they are pushing.  While I might agree that twitter is a complete waste of time, and honestly, I don't follow it, but it is one way to get your message out and call out the biased media.

[jg121783 3,921]

3 hours ago, Unidentified said:

First of all how the heck can you miss it? Second of all people who have actually met him say the same thing. Any other excuses for him?

 

2 hours ago, JimandChristy said:

I think it's very obvious he has a mental disorder. He's proven time and time again he fits the diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder. It's not like he shows glimpses of these behaviors, he consistently shows them. I thought he would stop after the election was over because he was campaigning but he hasn't, he just carried on.

Are either one of you lisenced doctors who can diagnose mental disorders? Didn't think so. But you did stay at a holiday Inn last night right? Even if you were a doctor giving a diagnosis of someone you have not met with personally is a violation of an APA ethics rule called the Goldwater Rule. I would not be willing to accept a diagnosis from a professional who hasn't met with Trump personally and I certainly would not accept a diagnosis from some leftist politicians and their cult followers as grounds to remove Trump (or any president) from office.

[CaliCat 3,957]

3 hours ago, jg121783 said:

 

Are either one of you lisenced doctors who can diagnose mental disorders? Didn't think so. But you did stay at a holiday Inn last night right? Even if you were a doctor giving a diagnosis of someone you have not met with personally is a violation of an APA ethics rule called the Goldwater Rule. I would not be willing to accept a diagnosis from a professional who hasn't met with Trump personally and I certainly would not accept a diagnosis from some leftist politicians and their cult followers as grounds to remove Trump (or any president) from office.

Oh, snap.

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/05/04/trump-malignant-narcissistic-disorder-psychiatry-column/101243584/

 

If you take President Trump’s words literally, you have no choice but to conclude that he is psychotic. A delusion is “a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact.” Despite all evidence to the contrary, Trump asserts that his New York office was bugged by President Obama, and that his inauguration had the biggest crowd size in history. Before the election, Right Wing Watch published a list of 58 conspiracies proclaimed by Trump.

Is it all for effect, to rile up his base, deflect blame and distract from his shortcomings, or does Trump really believe the insane things he says? It’s often hard to know, because as Harvard psychoanalyst Lance Dodes put it, Trump tells two kinds of lies: the ones he tells others to scam them, and those he tells himself. “He lies because of his sociopathic tendencies," Dodes said. "There's also the kind of lying he has that is in a way more serious, that he has a loose grip on reality." Is he crazy like a fox or just plain crazy? Not a question we want to be asking about our president.

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-dangerous-mental-illness-yale-psychiatrist-conference-us-president-unfit-james-gartner-a7694316.html

 

Donald Trump has a “dangerous mental illness” and is not fit to lead the US, a group of psychiatrists has warned during a conference at Yale University.

Mental health experts claimed the President was “paranoid and delusional”, and said it was their “ethical responsibility” to warn the American public about the “dangers” Mr Trump’s psychological state poses to the country.

Speaking at the conference at Yale’s School of Medicine on Thursday, one of the mental health professionals, Dr John Gartner, a practising psychotherapist who advised psychiatric residents at Johns Hopkins University Medical School until 2015, said: “We have an ethical responsibility to warn the public about Donald Trump's dangerous mental illness.”

[jg121783 3,921]

Any psychiatrist publicly giving a diagnosis of Trump (or anyone else for that matter) without meeting with him personally is in violation of APA ethics rules and should be stripped of their license. It is unprofessional and irresponsible for them to come to an uninformed conclusion and make it public for political reasons. This is the equivalent of a doctor diagnosing someone with lung cancer based solely on a few video clips they saw of the person. They along with any publication who published their "findings" also open themselves up to a libel lawsuit as shown by Goldwater vs Ginzburg. These so called doctors are nothing more than a bunch of quacks.

[CaliCat 3,957]

[jg121783 3,921]

The Goldwater Rule: Why breaking it is Unethical and Irresponsible

 

https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/apa-blogs/apa-blog/2016/08/the-goldwater-rule

 

Who is in denial?

[Boiler 47,495]

Were these people supporting Crooked Hillary, or did they call her out as well?