Jump to content
lostinblue

Hillary’s New Bedford Story In Her Acceptance Speech Is Yet Another Lie

 Share

14 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

Hillary’s New Bedford Story In Her Acceptance Speech Is Yet Another Lie

Hillary Rodham Clinton apparently would have you believe that, in 1973 she had forgone a career at a lucrative Washington D.C. law firm to instead, serve the public at Yale University’s Children’s Defense Fund (CDF). Not exactly the truth..but that’s not the whopper I speak of yet. While she did indeed work at the CDF in New Bedford in 1973, it seemed more like Plan B than her passion, but this was her fate and it served her well.

Hillary Rodham actually went for the big bucks at that dreamy law firm in D.C….but she failed to pass her bar exams in the District of Columbia, instead eventually passed them in Arkansas.

In last night’s acceptance speech, Secretary Clinton told a story of her experience on the South Coast of Massachusetts in the City of New Bedford as an attorney for the CDF that didn’t all add up according to my radio colleague Chris McCarthy



Read More: New Bedford's Former Mayor Questions Clinton's NB Story | http://wbsm.com/hillarys-anecdotal-in-convention-acceptance-speech-is-yet-another-lie/?trackback=tsmclip

If more citizens were armed, criminals would think twice about attacking them, Detroit Police Chief James Craig

Florida currently has more concealed-carry permit holders than any other state, with 1,269,021 issued as of May 14, 2014

The liberal elite ... know that the people simply cannot be trusted; that they are incapable of just and fair self-government; that left to their own devices, their society will be racist, sexist, homophobic, and inequitable -- and the liberal elite know how to fix things. They are going to help us live the good and just life, even if they have to lie to us and force us to do it. And they detest those who stand in their way."
- A Nation Of Cowards, by Jeffrey R. Snyder

Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama

white-privilege.jpg?resize=318%2C318

Democrats>Socialists>Communists - Same goals, different speeds.

#DeplorableLivesMatter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

Someone is going to have to upgrade storage, to keep up with all her lies.

A lot of criminals go down when they get so brazen they think they are above the law.

you need to up your dosages, your middle if the road is flaring uncontrollably

The content available on a site dedicated to bringing folks to America should not be promoting racial discord, euro-supremacy, discrimination based on religion , exclusion of groups from immigration based on where they were born, disenfranchisement of voters rights based on how they might vote.

horsey-change.jpg?w=336&h=265

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

A lot of criminals go down when they get so brazen they think they are above the law.

"A lot" doesn't include anyone named Clinton.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

Are you saying you believe her?

Do you plan to vote for her?

Do I believe her? There have been so many over the top innuendo, accusation and insults thrown into the cehest stop Hillary echo chamber...I have no idea what I am responding to.

Does calling her ugly really add any thing to the discussion?

Yes I plan to vote for her unless you have a better candidate.

The content available on a site dedicated to bringing folks to America should not be promoting racial discord, euro-supremacy, discrimination based on religion , exclusion of groups from immigration based on where they were born, disenfranchisement of voters rights based on how they might vote.

horsey-change.jpg?w=336&h=265

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

So because of #3, you choose to ignore #1 (on multiple accounts). Noted.

As for #2, no, it adds nothing. The same value she herself will bring to the highest office of this nation. But she IS butt-ugly. Even someone who ignores her lies and opts to vote for her has to admit that fact???

1. Do I believe her? There have been so many over the top innuendo, accusation and insults thrown into the cehest stop Hillary echo chamber...I have no idea what I am responding to.

2. Does calling her ugly really add any thing to the discussion?

3, Yes I plan to vote for her unless you have a better candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Let's keep it simple... Did she lie to us about sending classified email over her private server? Did she lie when she said she gave up as evidence all the required emails?

Do I believe her? There have been so many over the top innuendo, accusation and insults thrown into the cehest stop Hillary echo chamber...I have no idea what I am responding to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

So because of #3, you choose to ignore #1 (on multiple accounts). Noted.

As for #2, no, it adds nothing. The same value she herself will bring to the highest office of this nation. But she IS butt-ugly. Even someone who ignores her lies and opts to vote for her has to admit that fact???

So because of #3, you choose to ignore #1 (on multiple accounts).

That logic would get you an F with 6th grade algebra...and you still have no better candidate for me to vote for. Clearly many folks are uncomfortable with both candidates.

I think your statements about her personal appearance say more about your value system and perception of women. Those views undermine your arguments supporting of misogynistic Trump.

The content available on a site dedicated to bringing folks to America should not be promoting racial discord, euro-supremacy, discrimination based on religion , exclusion of groups from immigration based on where they were born, disenfranchisement of voters rights based on how they might vote.

horsey-change.jpg?w=336&h=265

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

1. That's your fault. Because you are not running, we have no better candidates. Run, and I will vote for you. I promise.

2. You have no clue as to my value system nor my views on women, but nice try on the personal attack. I said she is ugly. She is ugly. Facts are facts. Unless you are trying to say she is attractive, and find what I said offensive? Is that what you are saying?

1. and you still have no better candidate for me to vote for. Clearly many folks are uncomfortable with both candidates.

2. I think your statements about her personal appearance say more about your value system and perception of women. Those views undermine your arguments supporting of misogynistic Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...