Jump to content
tcTTct

Are spouses allowed in to the interview office?

12 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

The interview is one-on-one. You'll be sitting in the waiting area.


06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the interview for? They are for AOS based on K1 visa, not sure about others.


21 Aug 2013: I-129F Sent

11 Feb 2014: Visa APPROVED!

20 May 2014: Wedding!

--

31 Jul 2014: Mailed AOS Packet

12 Feb 2015: AOS Interview - Approved

--

22 Feb 2017: Mailed ROC Packet

08 Aug 2018: ROC Approved

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so for the initial interview but you can probably wait in the waiting area.

Edited by mallafri76

Met online October 2010


Engaged December 31st 2011


heart.gifMarried May 14th 2013 heart.gif



USCIS Stage


September 8th 2014 - Filed I-130 with Nebraska Service Center


September 16th 2014 - NOA1 received


March 2nd 2015 - NOA2 received :dancing:



NVC Stage


March 28th 2015 - Choice of agent complete & AOS fee paid


April 17th 2015 - IV fee paid


May 1st 2015 - Sent in IV application


May 12th 2015 - Sent in AOS and IV documents


May 18th 2015 - Scan Date


June 18th 2015 - Checklist received


June 22nd 2015 - Checklist response sent to NVC


June 25th 2015 - Put for Supervisor Review


Sept 15th 2015 - Request help from Texas US Senator Cornyn and his team


Sept 23rd 2015 - Our case is moved from supervisor review to NVC's team for dealing with Senator requests


Nov 4th 2015 - CASE COMPLETE!!!! :dancing:



Embassy Stage


Dec 16th 2015 - Medical exam


Dec 21st 2015 - Interview


Dec 21st 2015 - 221(g) issued at interview for updated forms


Jan 13th 2016 - Mailed our reply to the 221(g) to the US Embassy, received and CEAC updated the next morning


Jan 20th 2016 - Embassy require more in-depth info on asset for i-864


Feb 1st 2016 - Sent more in-depth info on assets as requested. Received the next morning


Feb 16th 2016 - Visa has been issued :dancing: :dancing: :dancing: :dancing: :dancing:



In the US


April 5th 2016 - POE Newark. No questions asked.


April 14th 2016 - SSN received


May 10th 2016 - First day at my new job :dancing:


May 27th 2016 - Green Card received


June 7th 2016 - Got my Texas driver's license

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was allowed in to the interview, and I am glad that I was, because they were about to make a big mistake concerning her name. I confronted the interviewing officer about that, and he spoke with his director and we got things corrected. This took place in Memphis, Tennessee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why didn't your wife offer the name correction herself?

First of all, I was invited into the interview room from the beginning, before the problem came up. And there was no need to do a name correction... her legal name was good enough.

During the interview is when there became a problem, while I was in there. We got married in the Philippines. In the Philippines, it is customary for the woman to replace her middle name with the maiden name, and then take the husband's last name as her own. For example, Jamie White Smith marries John Pete Wayne and the wife's name becomes Jamie Smith Wayne. The IO apparently was unaware of this. He kept insisting that for the naturalization she would have to change her name back to the original middle name. So as in our example, he was saying instead of her using her legal name, Jamie Smith Wayne, she would have to change it back to the former middle name, Jamie White Wayne. To change her name for naturalization would mean that she would have to use an alias instead of her legal name. All her records, from before ever leaving the Philippines was in her legal name, the name she got when we married. Our marriage certificate, her updated Philippines passport, all our immigration paperwork, social security number, drivers license, bank accounts, credit cards, birth certificate of our son with her name on it, military records... EVERYTHING was in her legal name and this IO wanted her to assume an alias for naturalization because he had a brain cramp or something.

Anyways, I was glad I was in the room, because I was able to help him see he could be making a huge mistake. If my wife was in there alone, instead of confronting him she would have just gone along with what he said and assumed an alias name, which would have really messed up her life, having 2 names. In the end the IO spoke with his director after I confronted him and the director told him that her legal name is the one that he should use, not the alias that he had chosen for her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe... yes....

It still irks me though, this long after. This guy works for USCIS. I cant figure out how he could have a job there. Imagine being told that you have to use a fake name to become a US citizen. And I asked him does it not occur to him that she will have to have every single legal document of hers changed to reflect this name that he is choosing for her? And he only appologized and said he cant help that. Just glad he spoke with the director and got straightened out.

Guess you being there was a good thing :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont know what the IO was thinking, but it was good I was allowed in that interview with my wife. She is very non-confrontational and would have said nothing. She doesnt always look at the long term consequences of things. It can be somewhat intimidating, those interviews, in some cases. I think they should always allow both spouses to be in the interview for naturalization, for the very reason it was good I was there. It affects both.

Maiden name becoming middle name is also common practice (though not quite as common as it used to be) in the US - why would USCIS IO not know this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×