Why don't we just attack North Korea first?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Obama is a coward compared to Bush he would have been all over North Korea by now.

That's not because Obama is a coward but because Bush is a moron.

[spookyturtle 9,465]

Obama is a coward compared to Bush he would have been all over North Korea by now.

But Bush couldn't pronounce nuclear.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Those are the ones I was making reference to. You know, a black kid turns around in your driveway so he deserves to be killed.

I know who you were referring to.

[spookyturtle 9,465]

I know who you were referring to.

We can't mention any names though.

[MyLittlePony 340]

That's not because Obama is a coward but because Bush is a moron.

Bush didn't ran the debt up compared to Obama or pull out a stimulus package on first term.

[spookyturtle 9,465]

Bush didn't ran the debt up compared to Obama or pull out a stimulus package on first term.

No, Bush did a stimulus and the first financial bailout in his second term so that makes it better.

[SaharaSunset 165]

When you - an adult armed to your teeth - are approached by a little confused 10 year old that raises his bare fists and yells "I'mma #@!$ you up!", would you think that the proper response is to pull out your guns and shoot that little boy? Or are you going to put him into a time-out? The latter, right? Well, that's what we're effectively doing and it's the right response for obvious reasons.

I'm not so sure that North Korea is a 10 year old with bare fists...More like a 17 year old with bare fists - but hardly some confused little tot. Now should we shoot to kill the 17 year old?...No. Is he really gonna hurt us - well, not in a life threatening way, but yeah, he could. So should we consider punching him first before he even has a chance to punch us?...Maybe.

[MyLittlePony 340]

No, Bush did a stimulus and the first financial bailout in his second term so that makes it better.

At least Bush gave extra refund money back but Obama gave free cell phones to blacks only. Did we get any money from Obama? nope nothing but a tax hike on second term.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I'm not so sure that North Korea is a 10 year old with bare fists...More like a 17 year old with bare fists

you funny.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Bush didn't ran the debt up compared to Obama or pull out a stimulus package on first term.

Bush didn't pull out a stimulus package first term? Technically, you're right. He actually pulled out two of them. In 2001 and 2003. These are, by the way, along with the moronic adventure he started in Iraq largely responsible for the debt that we've been piling up long after he left office.

[Pooky 3,365]

That article is a joke. Whoever wrote that, failed History 101. I'm not going to go through it point by point, because the whole thing is laughable. The 4th point that the war was/is between the DPRK and the U.S. is so off base. North Korea invaded South Korea in 1950.

Not to mention Geography 101. I can't quite find a land border between North Korea and Russia.

Basically the whole article is complete rose-tinted carp.

[MyLittlePony 340]

Bush didn't pull out a stimulus package first term? Technically, you're right. He actually pulled out two of them. In 2001 and 2003. These are, by the way, along with the moronic adventure he started in Iraq largely responsible for the debt that we've been piling up long after he left office.

Bush didnt ride air fore one to Disneyland and to play golf at least bush went to his ranch on vacation time not tax payers time.

[spookyturtle 9,465]

Bush didnt ride air fore one to Disneyland and to play golf at least bush went to his ranch on vacation time not tax payers time.

You mean he didn't get paid vacations?

[lostinblue 1,989]

Not to mention Geography 101. I can't quite find a land border between North Korea and Russia.

Basically the whole article is complete rose-tinted carp.

Russia and North Korea only have a 17-km long common border ...along the Tumen River

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Simple. Let them die on the vine. What is our interest in attacking them? What do we gain? We have the ability to defend against what they do and we have nothing to gain by a war with North Korea. They don't have anything! Let them spin in the wind.

This is not 1950 anymore.

If they pour across the border again a few satellite guided "time on target" artillery barrages with cluster munitions and fuel-air bursts will finish that in a few seconds. Missiles launched will be shot down and the air force will be destroyed on the ground in less than 2 hours by bombs dropped from planes they will never see. The war will be over in a day. IF it comes to that. Otherwise we can just save the money.

Edited April 4, 2013 by Gary and Alla