Jump to content

18 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just realised something the other day. I am not sure if I have anything that proves my legal status.

My I-94 ran out, my visa "expires" in December (we all know the K1 was voided the moment it was used). My AOS NOA's don't have an expiry date on them.

If LEO stops me (a cop) and want to ask me any difficult questions what do I have?

I use my UK drivers licence since Indiana won't give me one until I have my LPR / GC in hand, and while the insurance agent and the BMV decided that was enough to insure me and let me title my car respectively, the BMV won't issue a new licence/ID card.

Should I be carrying my passport with me, or at least a copy? My NOA1s?

Thanks.

David.

K-1 Timeline:

14 Sep 2010 - Mailed in I-129F.

08 Feb 2011 - NOA 2.

09 Jun 2011 - Visa in hand.

13 Aug 2011 - Wedding day.

AOS Timeline:

14 Oct 2011 - Mailed in AOS/EAD forms.

21 Oct 2011 - NOA for AOS/EAD.

05 Nov 2011 - Case transferred to CSC.

08 Nov 2011 - Biometrics.

29 Dec 2011 - EAD in hand.

05 Jan 2012 - I-485 Approved (AOS).

11 Jan 2012 - I-551/Permanent Resident Card in hand.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

carry your papers from USCIS I put in for my AOS in Oct and walked in when I got letter for biometrics and have work auth back also we must be lucky wentfor written drivers test past ad they said as it was icy out there tey had spaces for road tests so I got it there andthen just waiting formy G/Card now god luck on you journey

Posted

My papers... my NOAs? I-797C?

I guess you're not in Indiana.

David.

K-1 Timeline:

14 Sep 2010 - Mailed in I-129F.

08 Feb 2011 - NOA 2.

09 Jun 2011 - Visa in hand.

13 Aug 2011 - Wedding day.

AOS Timeline:

14 Oct 2011 - Mailed in AOS/EAD forms.

21 Oct 2011 - NOA for AOS/EAD.

05 Nov 2011 - Case transferred to CSC.

08 Nov 2011 - Biometrics.

29 Dec 2011 - EAD in hand.

05 Jan 2012 - I-485 Approved (AOS).

11 Jan 2012 - I-551/Permanent Resident Card in hand.

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted

I just realised something the other day. I am not sure if I have anything that proves my legal status.

My I-94 ran out, my visa "expires" in December (we all know the K1 was voided the moment it was used). My AOS NOA's don't have an expiry date on them.

If LEO stops me (a cop) and want to ask me any difficult questions what do I have?

Thanks.

If a cop stops you and inquires about your citizenship and immigration status tell him that it's none of his f*cking business as he's not a federal agent and thus overstepping his authority. He can go and hug himself. But that will never happen. Stop watching crazy movies, mate.

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all . . . . The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic . . . . There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else.

President Teddy Roosevelt on Columbus Day 1915

Posted

The cops in my town aren't the enemy ;) but it would be nice to prove I'm legal. They can look me up on the in-house database with my SSN and the wife comes up at my address and my last name so...

David.

K-1 Timeline:

14 Sep 2010 - Mailed in I-129F.

08 Feb 2011 - NOA 2.

09 Jun 2011 - Visa in hand.

13 Aug 2011 - Wedding day.

AOS Timeline:

14 Oct 2011 - Mailed in AOS/EAD forms.

21 Oct 2011 - NOA for AOS/EAD.

05 Nov 2011 - Case transferred to CSC.

08 Nov 2011 - Biometrics.

29 Dec 2011 - EAD in hand.

05 Jan 2012 - I-485 Approved (AOS).

11 Jan 2012 - I-551/Permanent Resident Card in hand.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

The cops in my town aren't the enemy ;) but it would be nice to prove I'm legal. They can look me up on the in-house database with my SSN and the wife comes up at my address and my last name so...

You are SUPPOSED to carry your passport at all times (I personally didn't, that seemed silly seeing how important it was) until you get your greencard (and even then I only carry a copy of that and my Iowa drivers licence).

It's unlikely you're permitted to get a state drivers licence until you're an LPR (this is state dependant), though some state laws require that you get a drivers licence after a certain period of being a "resident" of that state (CA for example is 10 days). Here's where it gets sticky. You're a "resident" in that you reside in that particular state, but you're not a "legal resident". So if asked you're a visitor, not a resident (using the CA example - admitting you LIVE in CA, rather than visiting, and have for longer than 10 days would result in a fine for driving without a valid licence, they don't make the "resident" vs "LPR" distinction). This should mean you're permitted to drive on your UK licence.

Then you have the issue of your legal status. Your AOS NOA1 proves you are in a period of "authorized stay" however local LEO's won't know this, which is why Bob is telling you that them asking about your legal status isn't their business. Even some ICE officers don't know that an AOS NOA1 gives you temporary protected status (you think they would). So you can still be detained by ICE, put in immigration jail until you go before an immigration judge who throws the case out and says you just need to wait until AOS is adjudicated.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

"It's nothing personal, Mr. LEO, but if you intend to detain and question me, my lawyer says that he must be present. Am I free to go?"

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

To other posters:

Please don't tell anyone to try to be a smart person by talking against a police office with non-sense lawyer stuff. It won't help anything.

Local law enforcement doesn't have the right to ask for your immigration status (except in AZ, police has right to ask for it - Google AZ Senate Bill 1070 - The Arizona Act additionally makes it a state misdemeanor crime for an alien to be in Arizona without carrying the required documents, requires that state law enforcement officers attempt to determine an individual's immigration status during a "lawful stop, detention or arrest.")

If you want to play safe, then you can carry you copy of your AOS receipt, EAD card.

N400

12/06/2014: Package filed

12/31/2014: Fingerprinted

02/06/2015: In-Line for Interview

04/15/2015: Passed Interview

05/05/2015: Oath letter was sent

05/22/2015: Oath Ceremony

Posted (edited)

You are SUPPOSED to carry your passport at all times (I personally didn't, that seemed silly seeing how important it was) until you get your greencard (and even then I only carry a copy of that and my Iowa drivers licence).

It's unlikely you're permitted to get a state drivers licence until you're an LPR (this is state dependant), though some state laws require that you get a drivers licence after a certain period of being a "resident" of that state (CA for example is 10 days). Here's where it gets sticky. You're a "resident" in that you reside in that particular state, but you're not a "legal resident". So if asked you're a visitor, not a resident (using the CA example - admitting you LIVE in CA, rather than visiting, and have for longer than 10 days would result in a fine for driving without a valid licence, they don't make the "resident" vs "LPR" distinction). This should mean you're permitted to drive on your UK licence.

Then you have the issue of your legal status. Your AOS NOA1 proves you are in a period of "authorized stay" however local LEO's won't know this, which is why Bob is telling you that them asking about your legal status isn't their business. Even some ICE officers don't know that an AOS NOA1 gives you temporary protected status (you think they would). So you can still be detained by ICE, put in immigration jail until you go before an immigration judge who throws the case out and says you just need to wait until AOS is adjudicated.

Thank you.

I don't intend on being pulled over but these things happen.

I had a ride along with a cop the other day and he didn't know about my DL issue, and the brother in law is a cop either and he didn't know. The BMV didn't seem to know either. BMV states you must get a licence when you become an _Indiana_ resident. They don't specify how long after you become an IN resident though. For visitors I have a year's grace. I asked the ladies at the BMV when they declined to give me an IN DL how long I can drive. They said a year.

Maybe I'l go back and get them to write me something on headed BMV paper that says I can drive on my UK licence ;)

I'm hoping the GC will come soon so I can apply for the IN DL without having to take the written test again - it's valid for 6 months from when I took it.

I don't want to have to drive to and from work with my EAD and no IN DL and be pulled over. I generally always feel guilty around cops and especially when I'm not "legal" :P

Edited by David And Katie

David.

K-1 Timeline:

14 Sep 2010 - Mailed in I-129F.

08 Feb 2011 - NOA 2.

09 Jun 2011 - Visa in hand.

13 Aug 2011 - Wedding day.

AOS Timeline:

14 Oct 2011 - Mailed in AOS/EAD forms.

21 Oct 2011 - NOA for AOS/EAD.

05 Nov 2011 - Case transferred to CSC.

08 Nov 2011 - Biometrics.

29 Dec 2011 - EAD in hand.

05 Jan 2012 - I-485 Approved (AOS).

11 Jan 2012 - I-551/Permanent Resident Card in hand.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)

State definitions of residency vary greatly from state to state. Many states' definitions of residency are very vague, and some make no reference to the federal "residence" indicated by a GC at all (this is particularly common in states that depend on a large population of illegal migrant agricultural workers, like Utah and California).

I PoE'd on my K-1 in July 2009. I married and filed my AOS papers in September 2009, my EAD arrived in mid-November, and my GC was issued on December 1, 2009. My Canadian driver's license, registration and insurance were good until December 13 2009, so I used it until mid-November, when I started looking in to how to get the Utah DL.

This was actually probably illegal. :) According to Utah law, someone who enters the state with the intention of being a resident is supposed to get a DL immediately. But of course, they wouldn't have given me one until I had an EAD to show them anyways, which just goes to show a very common pattern: it can literally be impossible for an international immigrant to comply with a state's DL residence laws - which are really mostly written with inter-state transferring US citizens in mind.

At the Utah DMV, you prove state residency by bringing in, among other possible documents, bank statements or other official mail to you showing a Utah address. Part of the verbiage of the state residency definition includes "making use of services that are typically limited to state residents, such as receiving a drivers license or registering a vehicle". So in their minds I might not have been provably a state resident until I actually registered my car and went to get a Utah DL. The state residency and DL laws can interact with the federal residence laws in such a complex way that it would take a lawyer to sort it out.

The general principles to follow, that get most people here through with a relative minimum of fuss are A ) try to get your car registered, insured locally, and get a local drivers license as soon as possible after getting an EAD (most states won't even let you apply without one, no matter when their laws say you technically have to), B ) drive like a grandma before that to avoid getting pulled over in the first place, and C ) if you do get pulled over, deny being a state resident on the grounds that you are still becoming a federal resident. This may be incorrect, depending on the state's definitions, but it's at least a plausible mistake to make and they're unlikely to hold it against you.

And to answer your original question: you don't need to carry your entire AOS packet with you, but carrying a colour double-sided photocopy of the I-485 NOA1 should be enough to show any inquisitive law enforcement officer that you are in the process of solidifying your status in the US. Your passport with K-1 and a copy of the marriage certificate would complete the picture.

Edited by HeatDeath

DON'T PANIC

"It says wonderful things about the two countries [Canada and the US] that neither one feels itself being inundated by each other's immigrants."

-Douglas Coupland

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)
Please don't tell anyone to try to be a smart person by talking against a police office with non-sense lawyer stuff. It won't help anything.
Poppycock. The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.
If you want to play safe, then you can carry you copy of your AOS receipt, EAD card.
This part is good advice. Also, for those who intend to break the law by NOT carrying their actual green card but instead carrying a color photocopy of it, attorneys recommend making an enlarged photocopy (>100% of original size) so that you won't run as high a risk of being charged with falsifying an official document. Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

Poppycock. The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.

Where did you find in my sentence that it is a crime to talk back a police officer? I was just saying that "big mouth" people like you shouldn't tell someone to do what wouldn't help the situation, for example to tell someone to be a law Einstein. Instead of trying to be a genius, let's find information for him/her because the fact that local police doesn't have that right to ask for your immigration status (except Arizona, please google AZ SB 1070 to improve your missing knowledge, police here does have the right to ask for your immigration proof.)

Assuming you are not a big mouth, then can you tell me how many people in the US have a family lawyer ready (someone you call right away when you are pulled over not someone your relative finds for you when you claim your butt in jail.) Then don't try to drag US Constitution Bills of Right here to claim your ignorance.

PS: Yes I might be a poopycock, but who are you? I bet you just a bigmouth guy after keyboard, trying hard to be Einstein. It's sad for you though.

N400

12/06/2014: Package filed

12/31/2014: Fingerprinted

02/06/2015: In-Line for Interview

04/15/2015: Passed Interview

05/05/2015: Oath letter was sent

05/22/2015: Oath Ceremony

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

Where did you find in my sentence that it is a crime to talk back a police officer? I was just saying that "big mouth" people like you shouldn't tell someone to do what wouldn't help the situation, for example to tell someone to be a law Einstein. Instead of trying to be a genius, let's find information for him/her because the fact that local police doesn't have that right to ask for your immigration status (except Arizona, please google AZ SB 1070 to improve your missing knowledge, police here does have the right to ask for your immigration proof.)

Assuming you are not a big mouth, then can you tell me how many people in the US have a family lawyer ready (someone you call right away when you are pulled over not someone your relative finds for you when you claim your butt in jail.) Then don't try to drag US Constitution Bills of Right here to claim your ignorance.

PS: Yes I might be a poopycock, but who are you? I bet you just a bigmouth guy after keyboard, trying hard to be Einstein. It's sad for you though.

Poppycock" is another way of saying "rubbish". He wasn't calling you a poppycock. They weren't telling you to be a smart-#######, they were trying to put a humerus spin on it (often helps you to remember). I doubt anyone would actually be a smart-####### to a police officer on purpose.

Posted

Poppycock" is another way of saying "rubbish". He wasn't calling you a poppycock. They weren't telling you to be a smart-#######, they were trying to put a humerus spin on it (often helps you to remember). I doubt anyone would actually be a smart-####### to a police officer on purpose.

What on earth does he think he is to tell someone bs? So you think everyone here is English master like you? Can everyone understand the way he "puts a humerus spin" or whatsoever on it? Be straightforward to help.

N400

12/06/2014: Package filed

12/31/2014: Fingerprinted

02/06/2015: In-Line for Interview

04/15/2015: Passed Interview

05/05/2015: Oath letter was sent

05/22/2015: Oath Ceremony

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

What on earth does he think he is to tell someone bs? So you think everyone here is English master like you? Can everyone understand the way he "puts a humerus spin" or whatsoever on it? Be straightforward to help.

You are right. It would have been best to make it obvious he wasn't saying to be rude (and that such behaviour would be foolish) but you are being WAY too aggressive and people are less likely to listen/read when you're being irrational. So if it makes you happy:

Most police officers have no right to ask about your immigration status. Be aware of your state laws. If a police officer asks about your status you are within your rights to tell the officer that he has no authority to ask about your status. Also be aware they are also within their rights to lock you up for a perceived crime while they contact ICE to come and check you out. Being a smart mouth will not get you anywhere. Be polite but firm.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...