Obama birth certificate issue more urgent than ever

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

THE USURPER-IN-CHIEF

March 28, 2010 -- By Joan Swirsky

At this point, every member of the Congress and media, as well as ordinary citizens, knows that there was something putridly rotten about Obama's election. Not just the billion dollars in campaign donations, most of which are still unaccounted for but known to have flowed from foreign donors, many of them enemies of America. And not just the missing mountains of qualifying data that all presidential candidates are expected to produce, including:

• His Illinois law license. Is he even a lawyer? Where is his supposed Harvard Law degree? Where are the papers he wrote in law school? Why does he not correct people when they say he was a law professor when he was never a professor but only a lecturer?
  
• His Selective Service registration, which investigative-journalist and lawyer Debbie Schlussel has reported to be falsified, an accusation that Linda Bentley quite persuasively documented just the other day.
  
• His visa or more probably visas. After all, he did travel to Pakistan in 1981 when Americans were forbidden into that country. Did he use the Indonesian visa he got when he was a citizen of that country?
  
• His school records from Indonesia and Hawaii.
  
• His college transcripts from Occidental College in CA, Columbia College in NY, and Harvard Law School in MA
  
• His Baptism certificate.
  
• His Illinois State Senate records.
  
• His law practice client list.
  
• His University of Chicago records, where Obama, the instructor, supposedly taught.
  

Just as mysterious is the question of who exactly backed this virtually unknown neophyte senator with the paper-thin résumé and almost non-existent voting record, this man who had lifelong associations with countless dubious-if-not-criminal friends and associates as well as political radicals.

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/swirsky/100328

[ready4ONE 5,400]

THE USURPER-IN-CHIEF

March 28, 2010 -- By Joan Swirsky

At this point, every member of the Congress and media, as well as ordinary citizens, knows that there was something putridly rotten about Obama's election. Not just the billion dollars in campaign donations, most of which are still unaccounted for but known to have flowed from foreign donors, many of them enemies of America. And not just the missing mountains of qualifying data that all presidential candidates are expected to produce, including:

• His Illinois law license. Is he even a lawyer? Where is his supposed Harvard Law degree? Where are the papers he wrote in law school? Why does he not correct people when they say he was a law professor when he was never a professor but only a lecturer?
• His Selective Service registration, which investigative-journalist and lawyer Debbie Schlussel has reported to be falsified, an accusation that Linda Bentley quite persuasively documented just the other day.
• His visa or more probably visas. After all, he did travel to Pakistan in 1981 when Americans were forbidden into that country. Did he use the Indonesian visa he got when he was a citizen of that country?
• His school records from Indonesia and Hawaii.
• His college transcripts from Occidental College in CA, Columbia College in NY, and Harvard Law School in MA
• His Baptism certificate.
• His Illinois State Senate records.
• His law practice client list.
• His University of Chicago records, where Obama, the instructor, supposedly taught.

Just as mysterious is the question of who exactly backed this virtually unknown neophyte senator with the paper-thin résumé and almost non-existent voting record, this man who had lifelong associations with countless dubious-if-not-criminal friends and associates as well as political radicals.

http://www.renewamer.../swirsky/100328

[justashooter 430]

the questions remain unanswered.

[Fandango 1,439]

Debbie Schlussel????? She's an enemy of these parts!

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Someone get me some coffee...

[Niels Bohr 72]

The question also remained unanswered if John Boehner really has a ####### or not.

Edited March 29, 2010 by Niels Bohr

[Sc0tt28 26]

THE USURPER-IN-CHIEF

March 28, 2010 -- By Joan Swirsky

At this point, every member of the Congress and media, as well as ordinary citizens, knows that there was something putridly rotten about Obama's election. Not just the billion dollars in campaign donations, most of which are still unaccounted for but known to have flowed from foreign donors, many of them enemies of America. And not just the missing mountains of qualifying data that all presidential candidates are expected to produce, including:

• His Illinois law license. Is he even a lawyer? Where is his supposed Harvard Law degree? Where are the papers he wrote in law school? Why does he not correct people when they say he was a law professor when he was never a professor but only a lecturer?
  
• His Selective Service registration, which investigative-journalist and lawyer Debbie Schlussel has reported to be falsified, an accusation that Linda Bentley quite persuasively documented just the other day.
  
• His visa or more probably visas. After all, he did travel to Pakistan in 1981 when Americans were forbidden into that country. Did he use the Indonesian visa he got when he was a citizen of that country?
  
• His school records from Indonesia and Hawaii.
  
• His college transcripts from Occidental College in CA, Columbia College in NY, and Harvard Law School in MA
  
• His Baptism certificate.
  
• His Illinois State Senate records.
  
• His law practice client list.
  
• His University of Chicago records, where Obama, the instructor, supposedly taught.
  

Just as mysterious is the question of who exactly backed this virtually unknown neophyte senator with the paper-thin résumé and almost non-existent voting record, this man who had lifelong associations with countless dubious-if-not-criminal friends and associates as well as political radicals.

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/swirsky/100328

None of those things are Presidential eligibility requirements.

Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution states: "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

So the only requirement would be his birth certificate to prove his citizenship and his age.

--He isn't required to be a lawyer and so the Illinois law license isn't required. A 35 year old janitor could be the President, provided he's a native born US citizen.

--His Selective Service registration isn't required. Let's just say, for the sake of argument that Obama didn't register, there are lots of people that fail to register for a number of different reasons. The consequences for not registering have been somewhat of a deterrant but it does not make anyone ineligible to be elected President.

--Let's assume that he did use his Indonesian passport to travel to Pakistan, having dual citizenship does not make him ineligible.

--School records? I didn't see anything about school records in the Constitution. He's not even required to have graduated from High School, let alone college

--Baptism certificate also not mentioned in the Constitution. He's not required to be baptised, nor is he required to be Christian

--The law practice client list just goes back to the first one...he's not required to have been a lawyer

--And lastly, he's not required to have been a professor at any college.

Now, let's say that the argument is that he lied about most of those things. Being a liar does not disqualify anyone from being President. As long as the people vote for him, it can be anybody.

The only requirements are:

1) Native born - some may argue this point but that needs to be taken up with the State of Hawaii

2) 35+ years old

3) 14 years a resident within the U.S.

[Danno 1,228]

None of those things are Presidential eligibility requirements.

Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution states: "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

So the only requirement would be his birth certificate to prove his citizenship and his age.

--He isn't required to be a lawyer and so the Illinois law license isn't required. A 35 year old janitor could be the President, provided he's a native born US citizen.

--His Selective Service registration isn't required. Let's just say, for the sake of argument that Obama didn't register, there are lots of people that fail to register for a number of different reasons. The consequences for not registering have been somewhat of a deterrant but it does not make anyone ineligible to be elected President.

--Let's assume that he did use his Indonesian passport to travel to Pakistan, having dual citizenship does not make him ineligible.

--School records? I didn't see anything about school records in the Constitution. He's not even required to have graduated from High School, let alone college

--Baptism certificate also not mentioned in the Constitution. He's not required to be baptised, nor is he required to be Christian

--The law practice client list just goes back to the first one...he's not required to have been a lawyer

--And lastly, he's not required to have been a professor at any college.

Now, let's say that the argument is that he lied about most of those things. Being a liar does not disqualify anyone from being President. As long as the people vote for him, it can be anybody.

The only requirements are:

1) Native born - some may argue this point but that needs to be taken up with the State of Hawaii

2) 35+ years old

3) 14 years a resident within the U.S.

Why corral the conversation over to "presidential requirements" .... the writer doesn't ....he just asks why there are so many unanswered questions and hidden parts of the Presidents past.

So lets hear your comments on that.

[Niels Bohr 72]

There are also so many unanswered questions regarding the GOP as well. I like to ask how many lobbyists have solicit the GOP into swinging their way.

[Sc0tt28 26]

Why corral the conversation over to "presidential requirements" .... the writer doesn't ....he just asks why there are so many unanswered questions and hidden parts of the Presidents past.

So lets hear your comments on that.

The "unanswered questions" are completely irrelevant.

So what if he wasn't a lawyer? Is he any less the President if he's not a lawyer?

So what if he went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport? If he's a citizen of Indonesia as well as the U.S. then what difference does it make?

So what if he wasn't baptised? What does that have to do with anything?

Why doesn't the OP ask so many questions about the mascot of his/her local football team? Because it doesn't matter and it isn't anyone's business.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Here, to all those with these critical questions: Make your own fcuking hats. Fcuktards.

Edited March 29, 2010 by Mr. Big Dog

[Niels Bohr 72]

[Dan J 277]

Why corral the conversation over to "presidential requirements" .... the writer doesn't ....he just asks why there are so many unanswered questions and hidden parts of the Presidents past.

So lets hear your comments on that.

In other words, you have nothing and you need to make an issue out of something... or your head will explode.

[luckytxn 2,263]

True. Obama the Socialist has proven anyone, even a janitor could be a president of the U.S.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Why corral the conversation over to "presidential requirements" .... the writer doesn't ....he just asks why there are so many unanswered questions and hidden parts of the Presidents past.

So lets hear your comments on that.

It often is seen as taking too much valuable time answering all of the questions idiots ask.