Jump to content

114 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

No, nobody from South America.

The situation I'm referring to is one where the presence of the immigrant is not one of 3 years, where they establish a life here...I'm talking about shorter term situations, like the one in this thread...where the poster said the immigrant was here a month, with full knowledge of the character of the spouse (that she may or may not have ignored simply with the intention of getting to the US no matter the price she might pay). Here, she had a green card, so she's here and that's it.

You say that it would be difficult for the immigrant to secure passage home. Well, if they can't do that, how are they going to pay for their medical expenses, food, transportation, housing or, heaven forbid, they get a car and injure someone else and have no insurance? If they are able to stick around and assume those expenses and risks, then they can sure as heck afford a flight home, no matter WHERE they are. Why should US taxpayers have to pay for these types of follies, where the immigrant can't afford a flight home, but incurs expenses and assumes risks in the US? THIS IS THE ISSUE I HAVE! Bona fide intentions or not, the immigrant, AND the USC, take a risk. But that risk should not, then, be foist upon society in general, which takes us back to the declaration of support discussion.

Things don't work out? Consider as a threshold question going back home. That was my statement in my first post in this thread, and the sentiment has not wavered. It's an option.

Edited by tito
  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

"The regulation, itself, imposes appropriate onus upon the alien to demonstrate his or her privilege to remain. That's how I see it is and how it should continue to be. And by the way, I've seen many instances where individuals have announced their intentions to fabricate a claim of abuse in order to try to remain, only to find that in order to prevail requires significant substantive evidence. Evidence that is not so easy to gather ex facto, and evidence that is much beyond a simple affidavit. "

That's the way it should be, too. Regarding the evidence...it really doesn't take that much, and the immigrant is afforded quite a bit of latitude when it comes to making the claim that would afford them the right to self-apply. As I understand, the process often involves deportation proceedings, and the claim of abuse is used as a defense. That gives the immigrant a little bit of leverage, and the immigration courts are fairly lenient given the fact that the immigrant might not know his or her rights, that they needed this or that to present to the court...so it's not that difficult a burden.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
"The regulation, itself, imposes appropriate onus upon the alien to demonstrate his or her privilege to remain. That's how I see it is and how it should continue to be. And by the way, I've seen many instances where individuals have announced their intentions to fabricate a claim of abuse in order to try to remain, only to find that in order to prevail requires significant substantive evidence. Evidence that is not so easy to gather ex facto, and evidence that is much beyond a simple affidavit. "

That's the way it should be, too. Regarding the evidence...it really doesn't take that much, and the immigrant is afforded quite a bit of latitude when it comes to making the claim that would afford them the right to self-apply. As I understand, the process often involves deportation proceedings, and the claim of abuse is used as a defense. That gives the immigrant a little bit of leverage, and the immigration courts are fairly lenient given the fact that the immigrant might not know his or her rights, that they needed this or that to present to the court...so it's not that difficult a burden.

Are you speaking from facts, or once again an impression you have? The process of attempting to adjust status and remaining in the USA as a self-petitioner who has not yet received a green card is a long and drawn out process. In fact, it can take years. The evidentiary requirements exceed a claim. They require proof.

"diaddie mermaid"

You can 'catch' me on here and on FBI.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
The situation I'm referring to is one where the presence of the immigrant is not one of 3 years, where they establish a life here...I'm talking about shorter term situations, like the one in this thread...where the poster said the immigrant was here a month....

In the instant case, the alien may only have been here a month, but had been married for a full 2 years prior to activiting the visa and status being conferred. I see it not as the time spent here in the USA, and of becoming familiar and settled in this country, but rather of time invested in a relationship, with natural expectations and history. Two plus years of marriage (I'll accept that there are indications that the alien may have known of the USC's proclivity, notwithstanding) is not a month, as you are implying.

"diaddie mermaid"

You can 'catch' me on here and on FBI.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: England
Timeline
Posted
Social Security does not hand out benefits for Fake Disabilities.

:whistle:

if you actually believe that, you're living in egypt... there are too many who abuse the system.

02/01/08 I-129F off to VSC!

02/02/08 VSC Received, signed by P Novak 12:02pm

02/05/08 VSC Cash Check and issue NOA1(online)

02/08/08 Touched

02/09/08 NOA1 received in mail

02/11/08 Touched

02/12/08 Touched

02/15/08 Touched

02/24/08 Touched

05/01/08 NOA2 (email)

05/02/08 Touched

05/06/08 NVC received

05/08/08 Hardcopy NOA2

05/08/08 Left NVC London bound!

Posted

I am unsure if the person concerned entered as a K1 or K3 or other....however in view of the fact her now husband had such a bad criminal record would he not have had to declare this on his application?

As for being returning to home country - i agree that i would not be able to return to my home country exactly as i left it...but i am afraid thats the risk i take as one door closes another one opens ....actions and consequences ....i would however still have my friends and family and they would help me with immediate problems such as housing temperarily ...thats why i invested more time in the relationship before committing ... to make sure what i was seeing wasnt just someone on his best behaviour for a one off time - especially important if you have peole who care for you asking you to reconsider. Whats that saying...marry in haste repent at leisure.

You are dealing with an adult - it seems she was given loads of relevant guidance - but chose to marry this man...so it is everyone elses fault she has poor judgement? Sounds like she may well be safer in her home country if this man is as unbalanced as he seems.

I certainly do not condone violence - and she certainly must receive immediate refuge and safe haven from this man ...but ultimately wether she should stay or go....?

I know there are some who will flame me for this ...and so be it....i would remind everyone though - this is a forum and we live in a democracy which supports the rights to free speech - regardless if it falls in or out with your own view or not.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Social Security does not hand out benefits for Fake Disabilities.

:whistle:

if you actually believe that, you're living in egypt... there are too many who abuse the system.

Extensive documentation of the disability sometimes still will result in a denial of benefits. I've been in court for disability claims. A lawyer will not represent a client with a fake injury and a judge won't award a claim. Apparently, someone has misinformed you and the op as to how the social security disability system awards benefits to disabled people since you both believe a disability can be faked. A back disability would require x-rays, ct scans, Mri,s before that person had any chance of collecting a benefit.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Jamaica
Timeline
Posted (edited)

I am at (almost) a complete loss of words at how this thread is going. It is clear that some persons have their perceptions mixed up because of (maybe) personal history. All I can say is that in my experience, life is not always filled with simple choices or decisions. I have had a rough go at it, but I am still standing.

To the OP: Good luck to your cousin. Her first priority is her safety!

Edited by Vawa-2006

May 20, 2008: Green card approved

N-400

February 22, 2011: Sent N-400 VAWA package

February 23, 2011: FedEx package signed for and delivered

March 15, 2011: Email NOA

March 15, 2011: Check cashed

March 17, 2011: Email re: Fingerprint Notice mailed out

March 18, 2011: NOA received (Notice Date 03/14; Priority Date: 02/23)

March 23, 2011: Biometrics notice received for 03/31

March 31, 2011: Biometrics completed

July 5, 2011: Online status: Now scheduled for interview

July 12, 2011: Received interview letter finally!

August 11, 2011: Interview Date (Garden City) - PASSED!!!

August 15, 2011: In line to be scheduled for Oath

August 16, 2011: Oath scheduled, notice sent

August 20, 2011: Oath notice received

September 15, 2011: Oath ceremony @ 8:30 AM

September 17, 20011: Passport application

September 21, 2011: Passport received

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
How did this guy get past IMBRA with a criminal record that long? Have none of his convictions been for abuse?

I have said the same thing on many occasions. I guess they let this one slip through the cracks. I am sure that with the thousands of cases they deal with that they all arent looked at as close as they should be.

so you're saying that the person checking on his criminal record were incompetent? This is an interesting issue.

it could well be he filed prior to imbra taking effect.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted
How did this guy get past IMBRA with a criminal record that long? Have none of his convictions been for abuse?

I have said the same thing on many occasions. I guess they let this one slip through the cracks. I am sure that with the thousands of cases they deal with that they all arent looked at as close as they should be.

so you're saying that the person checking on his criminal record were incompetent? This is an interesting issue.

it could well be he filed prior to imbra taking effect.

...or imbra doesnt apply since they filed for CR1?

to the OP i hope your cousin gets out of that abusive environment soon enough. worry about her immigrant options later, life is far more precious than any piece of paper...Goodluck!

mikeandlani

our Visa Journey

09.01.06 - Filed I130 to VSC

05.21.07 - NOA2

06.19.07 - NVC receives Petition

11.23.07 - CASE COMPLETE

01.30.08 - USEM Interview

02.02.08 - CR1 Visa Received

03.03.08 - Entered US through Detroit International

03.27.08 - Received 2yr Conditional Resident Card

04.01.08 - Filed for my SSN at the local SSA office

04.05.08 - SSN received by mail

05.03.08 - Finally got my Driver's License

lifting conditions....

I-I-751

12.07.09 - Sent I-751 to VSC by express mail

12.08.09 - I-751 delivered to VSC per USPS tracking :-)

12.09.09 - NOA1 date (Checked cashed :-D)

12.14.09 - Received NOA1

12.18.09 - ASC Appointment Notice Date

12.26.09 - Received ASC Appointment Notice

12.31.09 - Early Biometrics

01.14.10 - Biometrics Schedule

02.26.10 - Email update --Card Production ordered

03.02.10 - Email update --Approval Notice sent

03.06.10 - Approval Notice Received

03.08.10 - Card Received

Naturalization

I-N400

09.09.11 - Sent N400 to USCIS Dallas Lockbox

09.23.11 - Received 1-797 by mail

11.17.11 - Biometrics Schedule

01.25.12 - Received Interview and Exam Notice by mail

02.28.12 - Interview schedule

03.28.12 - Oath Ceremony

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Panama
Timeline
Posted
How did this guy get past IMBRA with a criminal record that long? Have none of his convictions been for abuse?

This is what baffles me also.How was he able to sponsor someone with that kind of track-record ? :blink:

May 7,2007-USCIS received I-129f
July 24,2007-NOA1 was received
April 21,2008-K-1 visa denied.
June 3,2008-waiver filed at US Consalate in Panama
The interview went well,they told him it will take another 6 months for them to adjudicate the waiver
March 3,2009-US Consulate claims they have no record of our December visit,nor Manuel's interview
March 27,2009-Manuel returned to the consulate for another interrogation(because they forgot about December's interview),and they were really rude !
April 3,2009-US Counsalate asks for more court documents that no longer exist !
June 1,2009-Manuel and I go back to the US consalate AGAIN to give them a letter from the court in Colon along with documents I already gave them last year.I was surprised to see they had two thick files for his case !


June 15,2010-They called Manuel in to take his fingerprints again,still no decision on his case!
June 22,2010-WAIVER APPROVED at 5:00pm
July 19,2010-VISA IN MANUELITO'S HAND at 3:15pm!
July 25,2010-Manuelito arrives at 9:35pm at Logan Intn'l Airport,Boston,MA
August 5,2010-FINALLY MARRIED!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 23,2010-Filed for AOS at the International Institute of RI $1400!
December 23,2010-Work authorization received.
January 12,2011-RFE

Posted (edited)

what a lucky #######! he was able to petition his wife eventhough he has been divorced 4 times and had previous criminal records, and getting only SSI? How could the embassy didnt do something do about it?!.. and now this is how he treats his wife in the U.S?!

Edited by AnneiyAndJacky

K3 VISA:

09/20/06 - I-130 Sent

10/03/06 - I-129F sent.

10/10/06- I-129F NOA1

11/28/06 - BOTH I-129F & I-130 approved!!!!

12/27/06 - NVC Left case no. assigned MNL 200685XXXX

01/26/07 - Received Packet 3

02/27/07 - Received Packet 4

03/01-02/07 - Done with my Medical Appointment at St. Lukes

04/17/07 - Interview at U.S Embassy - got the blue slip..on AR

07/05/07 - Went back to US Embassy submitted new affidavit of support for my K3, we'll wait for decision, still on AR

07/24/07 - OMG!!!! I cant believe it I got my K3 Visa in hand!!!

08/09/07 - Arrival in the U.S - POE at LAX

AOS:

08/27/07 - Sent AOS and EAD

08/29/07 - Chicago Lockbox received both AOS and EAD

09/18/07 - Checks cashed 09/21/07 - NOA on both AOS and EAD

09/27/07 - Received Biometrics Appointment Notice

10/18/07 - Biometrics

10/19/07 - Received RFE

10/26/07 - USCIS received the response to our RFE

11/05/07 - EAD Card Production ordered

11/16/07 - EAD Card received

11/26/07 - Received interview notice

01/25/08 - Interview Date!!!! APPROVED!!!

04/18/08 - At long last! GC Card production ordered

04/21/08 - Email noticed welcome letter

04/23/08 - Email card production again

04/25/08 - Welcome Letter received

04/30/08 - Greencard received

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

If this person is in so much danger, why have you not kept her at your house (when she has been visiting) and called the police.

You have told us yourself that she is in danger but you are not doing anything to help her,

Nov 11th 2003 sent i29f form to VSC

Nov 18th 2003 received NOA 1

Jan 17th 2004 NOA 2

Feb 6th 2004 received package 3

March 11th 2004 recieved package 4

April 7th 2004 interview in Sydney

April 7th 2004 VISA GRANTED

April 27th 2004 Arrive in Boston 8.30pm

may 29th 2004 WEDDING DAY

May 11th 2004 applied for SSN

May 17th received SSN card

June 12th 2004 applied for AOS EAD AP

July 7th 2004 NOA received for AOS EAD

August 3rd 2004 Biometrics appt in Rhode Island

EAD approved online Aug 3rd 2004

EAD card arrived in the Mail Aug 9th 2004

started working 13th September 2004

applied for renewal of EAD May 9th 2005

bio appt for EAD renewal June 10th 2005 in Boston

July 6th renewal EAD approved

July 12th 2005 renewal EAD arrived in the mail

Sept 12th AOS suspended until FBI fingerprints are done

Sept 17th FBI fingerprint appt

Oct 14th 2005 AOS interview

Oct 14th 2005 AOS interview success

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Mexico
Timeline
Posted

To the OP.

If your wife's cousin truly believes that she is in danger due to either physical, mental or verbal abuse IMMEDIATELY have her remove herself from the situation. If necessary man up and go with her and your wife and file a complaint at the local police station. After the complaint has been filed, apply at the Superior court for a civil protection order for you and your wife and her cousin. If your wife's cousin cannot stay at your house get her into a battered women's shelter. Under your county's social services you should be able to locate the number for the local shelter.

Waste no time getting your wife's cousin out of danger. Abusers normally escalate the abuse over time.

Everything else that has been said on this thread ignore for now. The most important thing is removing your wife's cousin from the danger.

As one who has been in a similar situation, I can say that it is EXTREMELY difficult to leave an abusive relationship. The abuse has a tendency to numb the mind, and destroy the self-esteem. One tortures oneself through fear of leaving and fear of future abuse. It is only with time after leaving the abuse that one can look back with a rational mind and see the situation as it truly was and can only then be in agreement with many of the posts in this thread.

The best of luck to your wife's cousin and don't beat yourself up over the woulda, shoulda, could ofs.

Si me dieran a elegir una vez más_____ Nos casamos: el 01 de Julio 2008

te elegiría sin pensarlo _______________ Una cita con una abogada para validar la info de VJ: el 24 de Agosto, 2008 (Ya ella me cree)

es que no hay nada que pensar_______ El envio del I-130: el 26 de Agosto 2008

que no existe ni motivo ni razón ______ Entregado a las 14:13 PM en el 26 de Agosto, 2008 en CHICAGO, IL. Firmado por V BUSTAMANTE.

para dudarlo ni un segundo ___________ La 1ra Notificación de Acción (NOA1): el 29 de Agosto 2008

porque tú has sido lo mejor ___________ El cheque al USCIS cobró: el 2 de Septiembre, 2008

que todo este corazón ________________ Un toque el 19 de septiembre, 2008

y que entre el cielo y tú

yo me quedo contigo

-Franco deVita

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...