Boiler

That is not how it works. If she needs to visit the US for urgent medical treatment that look a the B2 Medical Visa.

Do you mean DCF Are you both living in Kenya?

Jim had a classic on 2 days ago, in this case this guy had been visited and was trying to prove the opposite, that he was not cohabitating with an ex wife whilst married to a USC. As he explained it they lived at opposite ends of the building. I envisaged some massive mansion with one of those very long dining tables, turned out to be a 2 bedroom apartment. Now this does sound more like that standard US Film from the 1950's arrangement.

https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/driver-education-and-safety/special-interest-driver-guides/new-to-california/

If the +1 was for example a US Citizen there would be no issue and they would cover your expenses as defined. But you are not so the only option you have currently is to visit, I assume you can use the VWP which is up to 90 days, I would not push it that far, and that you will find out in April what sort of expenses they will reimburse, flights, living costs whatever. Maybe x flights a year and a per diem?

10 days

Permit Usually new residents can for a while which varies by State. Some are more generous than others.

Definitely check with the Consulate 2 weeks is tight

You were told what to do. But seem to have ignored that.

The way I read it is that he does not have a Visa.

IAnd if you are short of money the last thing you want to do is delay EAD.

You mention no basis for him to be admitted to the US, presumably he has the Mothers permission to travel to leave the US.

Unmarried children of a USC are F1, but they can keep their PD of F2b is it is beneficial. Married children of USC are F3, they get to bring their Spouse and underage children.

Yes they would, how are they getting their Million not subject to tax?

‘Hypocrisy’: Tata builds vast India furnace despite Port Talbot emissions claims Owner says shutting Welsh blast furnaces will cut emissions, but it is opening a new one in India https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/jan/24/unions-accuse-tata-of-hypocrisy-over-port-talbot-closure-green-claims In announcing the redundancies last week, the company said that the overhaul would “secure most of Tata Steel UK’s existing product capability and maintain the country’s self-sufficiency in steelmaking, while also reducing Tata Steel UK’s CO2 emissions by 5 million tonnes per year and overall UK country emissions by about 1.5%”. However, the project at Kalinganagar could increase the company’s overall global emissions. It will be among the largest blast furnaces in the world, with a 5,870 cubic metre capacity, and is due to be completed this year. I had relations who worked at Port Talbot, not sure if any distant ones do now, if so for not much longer. Many saw it as a better bet than the Mines.

It does make you wonder what the end game is for Progressives? How much progress can the average person take.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/23/food/in-n-out-oakland-closure-crime/index.html Must be a reference to this: — In-N-Out is permanently closing one of its restaurants for the first time ever, announcing that its Oakland location will soon shutter because of rampant crime in the California city. The burger chain said in a statement that “despite taking repeated steps to create safer conditions, our customers and associates are regularly victimized by car break-ins, property damage, theft, and armed robberies.” The location, which has been open for nearly two decades, will close on March 24. It’s the city’s only In-N-Out and is near the airport. Crime has indeed substantially increased in Oakland: Burglaries were up 23% and motor vehicle thefts were up 44% in 2023 compared to a year prior, according to Oakland Police Department data obtained by CNN affiliate KGO-TV. In-N-Out said in a statement that while “several” of its locations have relocated in its 75-year history, the Oakland closure is the first restaurant it has closed. “We feel the frequency and severity of the crimes being encountered by our customers and associates leave us no alternative,” said Chief Operating Officer Denny Warnick, in the statement. Voting has consequences.

EAD and AP are optional. More reasons for the K1 not normally being a good option.

She should set herself up to be the spare, you never know.

That would be for an immigrant visa with a qualifying relative

No

So yes, that could well complicate matters.

Do they have a criminal history?

You can always apply, I do not know if you will be approved or not.

I am going to guess you did a Roxham Road? So you were refused for misrep and immigrant intent. I believe you need an I 192 for Misrep, there is no waiver for immigrant intent, you need a change of circumstances. https://e-safe.cbp.dhs.gov/s/login/?ec=302&startURL=%2Fs%2F A timeline would help, certainly does sound that you have an interesting immigration past.