Family

With Friends like these ..who needs Enemies ? Marjorie Taylor Greene won't support her party's choice for House speaker because he has cancer https://www.businessinsider.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-steve-scalise-house-speaker-cancer-2023-10?amp

Banker wicked humor … 😂 Banker says Trump’s financial statements were key to loan approvals, but there were ‘sanity checks Trump’s “statements of financial condition” were key to his approval for a $125 million loan in 2011 for his golf resort in Doral, Florida, and a $107 million loan in 2012 for his Chicago hotel and condo skyscraper, former Deutsche Bank risk management officer Nicholas Haigh testified. But although the bank didn’t conduct its own full appraisals of Trump’s properties, it sometimes gave sizable “haircuts” to the values he’d placed on such holdings as Trump Tower and his golf courses, Haigh said. I think the phrase we used might have been ‘sanity checks’ on the numbers,” he https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-letitia-james-fraud-new-york-364d1052f98816121000c26dc66f3878

Suggested changes

Strategic move George Will calls on Tim Scott to drop out of White House race, back Haley https://thehill.com/homenews/4248403-george-will-calls-on-tim-scott-to-drop-out-of-white-house-race-back-haley/amp/

Progress .. Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan host summit featuring 2024 hopefuls Nikki Haley, Mike Pence, Chris Christie and Doug Burgum WITHOUT DeSantis and Ramaswamy Sen. Mitt Romney and former House Speaker Paul Ryan are hosting a summit focused on finding an alternative for Trump Among those attending the two-day, closed-door summit are Nikki Haley, Mike Pence, Chris Christie and Doug Burgum

Rough few days ..since Saturday world events . Here to draw on good vibes of all posters and nominees …a refreshing thread with only praise and kindness . So ..keeping in mind @Mike E is “ my guy “ 😂..a few Un Nominated co -conspirators of Good Will come yo Mind @Lemonslice @Demise @sandra of the Vawa @African Zealot

Trump Mocks MAGA Supporters Behind Their Backs: Ex-Pence Aide https://www.newsweek.com/trump-mocks-maga-supporters-behind-their-backs-ex-pence-aide-1833623?amp=1

Ex-Trump Org CFO Knew Size Of Trump’s Penthouse Was Inflated, He Testifies Former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg admitted in court Tuesday he was aware the size of former President Donald Trump’s Manhattan penthouse was smaller than the company reported—but claimed not to notice it was listed wrong on financial statements—as Trump, his company and business associates stand trial for alleged civi https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/10/10/ex-trump-org-cfo-knew-size-of-trumps-penthouse-was-inflated-he-testifies/amp/

Seems he won’t be able to “ like “ them on social media either 😂 Special counsel seeks to conceal juror identity in Trump Jan. 6 trial https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4247852-special-counsel-seeks-to-conceal-juror-identity-in-trump-jan-6-trial/amp/

Justice Department fights Trump effort to push Mar-a-Lago trial until after 2024 election https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4245562-justice-department-fights-trump-effort-to-push-mar-a-lago-trial-until-after-2024-election/

They have had glitches both paper and online . Came out in omnbudsman report a few times …but assuming OP s copy is accurate as filed ..this is just a human USCIS ( data entry point )error Fast fix only w congressman

Clearly a USCIS mistake as 61 was left blank and 62 correctly marked for consulate Have USC contact her congressman for help

And “ precise issue “ was identified as misrep of marital status at K-1 interview.. OP wants to 1. speed up I-601 and or 2. continue fight to prove he had a regular /western style party and convince post to reverse . Unless , of course I missed something…

Waiver was filed by attorney and well prepped

Your attorney has no liability and gave you solid advice . Once K-1 is shot down ..no bringing it back to life . As for arguments back and forth with consulate ..( either by you or attorney) not much chance to persuade them no matter how fancy. They do have ears on the ground , so to speak ..and high fraud volume . I would presume they know who attends a Knitbah ..or gleamed other info from pictures, social media posts ..etc

Here you go .. Ninth Circuit Undermines Doctrine of Consular Nonreviewability Two weeks ago, the Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc of a divided panel decision in Muñoz v. Department of State. In that panel decision last October, the panel majority invented a rule that the government had to provide notice “within a reasonable time period” of its reason for denying a visa. https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/ninth-circuit-undermines-doctrine-of-consular-nonreviewability/amp/

I do not have link to that case ..sorry . I know I posted it last year . There have been successful DIY and attorneys challenges..just arguing with consulate , congressman help and LegalNet…but not with your facts

Just noticed I had not included link . No such burden on DOS.. The recent gain on consular non reviewabilty , I recall last year BUT … it will not help you cause you are not litigating case in US Courts Your only chance was / is to persuade them ( Consulate ) to reverse themselves and ITS NOT going to happen And very common for them to see your exact facts and ceremony …so my position remains same ..let it go . https://ilw.com/articles/2009,1022-white.shtm Challenging A Finding Of Inadmissibility by Kenneth White Unfortunately, the cards are stacked against applicants with a legitimate basis for challenging findings of inadmissibility. Unlike with USCIS and DOL, there is no formal appeals process for denied applications within the Department of State. Judicial review is practically nonexistent because of the doctrine of consular nonreviewability. Some posts, particularly isolated ones, have been compared to fiefdoms, governed by caprice and personal agendas rather than laws and regulations.

The waiver was prep by attorney and already filed . I think OP want to 1. try expedite 2. Keep trying to challenge misrep

If you are intent on continuing the fight to challenge the inadmissibility..then you need to beef up your legal vocabulary when you consult the attorneys experience and expertise . You want some with hands on experience tackling Consular Non Reviewabilty doctrine , fluent in FAM and the INA for the “ willful misrep “ threshold. As previous poster suggested , if $$ is no object ..contact Carl Schusterman or Norton Toby ( both write law books ) .. You have done everything possible up to know . Am assuming here your attorney reviewd the K-1 interview Q and A meticulously ( word by word ) and emailed a brief /argument challenging the K-1 inadmissibility misrep . i am presuming your “ ceremony “ was a Nikka ..so he would have conceded K-1 ineligibility . The Q and A nuances are likely your issue anyway and they are strictly related to marriage. Muslim couples are perfectly aware the Nikkah deems them married in the eyes of Islam .. even if the do not legalize or register that marriage . But as I said earlier , an expedite is simple , accomplished with a phone call and IF you meet criteria can try more than once Look over the dreaded DS-5535 thread . Most there have shopped WOM attorneys and some good recommendations. i am not a big fan of Jim Hacking ..for anything but WOM …but he is culturally sensitive to Islamic law issues ..so do try him too Challenging A Finding Of Inadmissibility by Kenneth White 9 FAM 302.9-4(A) (U) Grounds (CT:VISA-543; 03-27-2018) (U) INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) provides that "any alien who by fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact seeks to procure (or sought to procure or has procured) a visa, other documentation, or admission into the United States or some other benefit provided under" the INA is ineligible. https://fam.state.gov/fam/09FAM/09FAM030209.html

I will have you know Sir, , We cook only the Best Books😂,,,though the rules of nominees collecting their prize TESLA ..are still under audit .

I am ..getting the sense this is AI …

A great loss . I read a few older threads and his advice was much sought after .

Day 5 in fraud trial testimonial; In a dramatic finale, McConney admitted that ex-Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg asked for his help in committing tax fraud. He said he kept engaging in this illegal conduct because Weisselberg was his boss and if he refused, he would probably have lost his job. Judge Arthur Engoron later in the day turned down an effort from Trump's lawyers to suspend the trial. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/live-blog/trump-fraud-trial-live-updates-rcna119144

Not doable . Little to zero weight will be given to a statement from you and even if a new neighbor offers something ..it won’t overcome the meticulous record of FDNS investigation . Don’t know what the attorney promised you..but be careful in crafting response …devils in the details and they are going to comb through everything with a fine tooth comb