Jump to content

Luqmanahmed6753

Members
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • City
    CHICAGO
  • State
    Illinois

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    Naturalization (approved)
  • Place benefits filed at
    Phoenix AZ Lockbox
  • Local Office
    Phoenix AZ
  • Country
    India

Luqmanahmed6753's Achievements

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yea.. but in my own sense I have been waiting since 2018.. what I see as the problem is that the embassy nor USCIS informed me about any finding of misrep. How was I allowed by the system to file an I-130 and go thru the entire damn process until my wife was given a permanent bar at the interview? If they had informed me I would've appealed it or at least not wasted my money and three years of agonizing wait.
  2. Well, after what Hacking said. I sure don't wanna rush myself into something unfortunate. My attorney also said that sometimes a WoM can make them angry, issuing denials and RFEs
  3. Yea i hope to speed up 601, but idt the consulate will do anything on their end. I emailed them dozens of times from different email addresses and my wife emailed them too and the only thing they want is a waiver. They said the same thing to the senator. LegalNet is also saying we can't do anything cuz the finding was made by USCIS, even thought the email the consulate sent through the senator clearly states "The consular officer at that time found that she had willfully misrepresented her marital status" but LegalNet won't listen.
  4. The waiver gets filed to USCIS under DHS, so I don't think it's confrontational to them. The waiver also includes the other arguments as secondary: if applicant is inadmissible, she is still eligible for the waiver approval based on.... I did the K1 and IR1 myself, but I consulted the same lawyer who is doing the waiver at the time of the K1 denial and he had said to go ahead and get married and file an IR1, and I consulted him again right before the IR1 interview, and he said everything is good, your case is straightforward. Might he be trying to evade the liability of that?
  5. I reviewed the FAM and INA portions applicable to my situation, but unless the DoS of DHS comes forward with something I can't argue. They just say misreped marital status, no specification. My attorney made a quite simple argument in the waiver brief, basically saying that the burden of proof lies on the DoS to prove misrep and that DoS has not met that burden here. They didn't quote any legal reference to that tho. I dont really have the $$ to throw at more attorneys unless I know I'll be getting something out of it. If someone can find a law which states that the burden of proof for a finding of misrep lies on the DoS maybe I can try to send that to LegalNet.
  6. Noo. It was an engagement ceremony. No nikah was done until we officially married in 2020 after the k1 case was closed
  7. What i dont understand is that the consulate is saying she was "found ineligible in march 2020" and "the officer at that time found" and then LegalNet saying that the finding was entered by USCIS even though they closed the case and said all USCIS matter in this case is concluded. It doesn't add up and it seems like there is some error made by one of the agencies.
×
×
  • Create New...