Length of stay

[twostar55 0]

A question:

If the U.S. petitioner wants the K-1 holder to leave (his/her household) before the the 90-day period, is the U.S. petitioner required by law to support the K-1 holder for the remainder of the 90 day period until they must leave the country?

Thanks

[desert_fox 32]

A question:

If the U.S. petitioner wants the K-1 holder to leave (his/her household) before the the 90-day period, is the U.S. petitioner required by law to support the K-1 holder for the remainder of the 90 day period until they must leave the country?

Thanks

legally,... doubtful without a court order...morally...yes

He/she should make sure that you get back to your home country.

Edited October 19, 2006 by desert_fox

[rob&ana 0]

You know,

When you’ve made up your mind, you don’t go about posting everything on a website. It is plainly rude, and immature. Not to mention, that you pi$$ the hell out of a bunch of people, because your case delays theirs. Maybe she is better off back at her home country, instead of sharing her life with a half a man like you!

[john_and_marlene 162]

This falls strictly into the realm of legal opinion and is best left to a lawyer. Although you may not currently be enforceably bound for support, you could find yourself at the wrong end of a lawsuit that could be enforced.

Your household is now her residence also and you may not have the right to require her to leave without a court order. You have probably signed a letter of intent to marry her and your actions might be judged as a breach of promise. From your other post, you have changed the conditions and might have to deal with the consequences.

[Kez/JWolf 6]

So because she wont sign your prenup you want to dump her in a country she does not know with an 11 year old child in tow.....

Wow what a man you are.....

I wish her well in overcoming meeting a man like you...

Kezzie

[john_and_marlene 162]

You know,

When you’ve made up your mind, you don’t go about posting everything on a website. It is plainly rude, and immature. Not to mention, that you pi$$ the hell out of a bunch of people, because your case delays theirs. Maybe she is better off back at her home country, instead of sharing her life with a half a man like you!

I'm always saddened when posts resort to name calling. Be the better person. Give your opinion. Vigorously disagree. But, please don't lower yourself to personal attacks. You do yourself a disservice.

[rob&ana 0]

You know,

When you’ve made up your mind, you don’t go about posting everything on a website. It is plainly rude, and immature. Not to mention, that you pi$$ the hell out of a bunch of people, because your case delays theirs. Maybe she is better off back at her home country, instead of sharing her life with a half a man like you!

I'm always saddened when posts resort to name calling. Be the better person. Give your opinion. Vigorously disagree. But, please don't lower yourself to personal attacks. You do yourself a disservice.

Lets put it this way, I did edit it before posting...

What I had written was even worse.

[Peter Miami 0]

So because she wont sign your prenup you want to dump her in a country she does not know with an 11 year old child in tow.....

Wow what a man you are.....

I wish her well in overcoming meeting a man like you...

Kezzie

Peter Miami

[Jasman0717 8]

You know,

When you’ve made up your mind, you don’t go about posting everything on a website. It is plainly rude, and immature. Not to mention, that you pi$$ the hell out of a bunch of people, because your case delays theirs. Maybe she is better off back at her home country, instead of sharing her life with a half a man like you!

I'm always saddened when posts resort to name calling. Be the better person. Give your opinion. Vigorously disagree. But, please don't lower yourself to personal attacks. You do yourself a disservice.

I agree, sometimes there is just too much personal bashing going on.

In my opinion I would think that when you submitted the I-134 you became responsible for the beneficary for as long as they are in the U.S. The whole idea is to NOT burden the tax payer with the beneficiary going to public assistance to survive.

[twostar55 0]

So because she wont sign your prenup you want to dump her in a country she does not know with an 11 year old child in tow.....

Wow what a man you are.....

I wish her well in overcoming meeting a man like you...

Kezzie

[/quote

Yeah,

God bless you too,

[xjennyinstereox 0]

So because she wont sign your prenup you want to dump her in a country she does not know with an 11 year old child in tow.....

Wow what a man you are.....

I wish her well in overcoming meeting a man like you...

Kezzie

I completey completely completely completely COMPLETELY second this. UGH. UGH UGH UGH UGH. Makes me SICK reading this. I wish her well too and her poor daughter who is innocent in all this and has had to adjust to being in a new country at a new school making new friends...... AWFUL!

[rellik 0]

It's my understanding that you are responsible for ensuring that she/he leaves the country in the 90 day time frame. That's the way it was explained to me anyway.

[Caladan 19]

Don't know about legally. The I-134 isn't binding so far as I know, but checking with an immigration attorney would be wise.

Morally, buy a pair of plane tickets, let her stay until she leaves the U.S., and be a man.

[Dean iWait 0]

I'm just curious as to why all you people are assuming that he is a big bad man? That he wants to put this poor little innocent woman and her daughter out on the street. It's been well documented that foreign women do use USC's simply to get into the country. This could be the case here couldn't it? I don't know if it is or isn't. But Geez! Maybe you all personally know the OP. But I don't.

Edited October 19, 2006 by Dean iWait

[UmmSqueakster 54]

I'm just curious as to why all you people are assuming that he is a big bad man? That he wants to put this poor little innocent woman and her daughter out on the street. It's been well documented that foreign do use USC's simply to get into the country. This could be the case here couldn't it? I don't know if it is or isn't. But Geez! Maybe you all personally know the OP. But I don't.

Perhaps because we've read other stuff he's posted recently