USCIS Wants to Hear Your Input (merged)

[Janelle2002 3,865]

Well actually I am not sure. How are we supposed to comment on this. There is no indication in the email or on their wesbite! I will call customer service but I doubt that they will know.

Okay. Let us know. I agree with you. Once you come up with a plan let us know. I am sure other people will work to support your cause. They should handle people who are already pending before taking on new bait.

[Avery Cates 1,141]

And what do you want us to do to help with this cause? Give examples.

Haven't you ever been to a good rabblerousing?

Do ALL THE THINGS!

[Janelle2002 3,865]

You have to show people what action you want them to take. For example, I have started a petition for my husband.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/unite-separated-husband-and-wife-who-has-been-married-almost-2-years-and-are-still-separated-each/fCjXQvrB

Maybe you can start something like this, or give us a letter you want us to type up and send to USCIS, or to our local Congressman or bombard the White House with emails.

[thedude6752000 360]

Does anyone have anything constructive to add? How are we supposed to comment on this?

[Avery Cates 1,141]

Does anyone have anything constructive to add? How are we supposed to comment on this?

A cursory search didn't lead to anything fruitful. Did the email contain another link? There's nothing on the USCIS website itself.

[thedude6752000 360]

A cursory search didn't lead to anything fruitful. Did the email contain another link? There's nothing on the USCIS website itself.

No it did not, very frustratingly. It only included the two links I pasted containing the long legal mumbo-jumbo about the proposed changes. Why would they ask for comments and then not provide a venue for us to comment in? I don't think I even want to know.

[Nordic Tim 95]

Haven't you ever been to a good rabblerousing?

Do ALL THE THINGS!

I thought it was a little funny.

[pauli 49]

I guess you missed this right in the middle of the "legal mumbo jumbo":

DATES

:

Written comments must be

received on or before July 11, 2014

ADDRESSES

:

You may submit comments,

identified by DHS Docket No. USCIS–

2012–0005 by one of the following

methods:

•

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov

. Follow the

instructions for submitting comments.

•

Email:

You may submit comments

directly to DHS by email at

USCISFRComment@uscis.dhs.gov

.

Include DHS Docket No. USCIS–2012–

0005 in the subject line of the message.

•

Mail:

Chief, Regulatory

Coordination Division, Office of Policy

and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and

Immigration Services, Department of

Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529–

2140. To ensure proper handling, please

reference DHS Docket No. USCIS–2012–

0005 on your correspondence. This

mailing address may be used for paper,

disk, or CD–ROM submissions.

•

Hand Delivery/Courier:

Chief,

Regulatory Coordination Division,

Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S.

Citizenship and Immigration Services,

Department of Homeland Security, 20

Massachusetts Avenue NW.,

Washington, DC 20529–2140. Contact

telephone number is (202) 272–8377.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

:

Paola Rodriguez Hale, Adjudications

Officer (Policy), Office of Policy and

Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and

Immigration Services, Department of

Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529–

2141. Contact telephone number is (202)

272–1470.

[pauli 49]

...and maybe you should read the summaries and understand what it's all about before going on a tirade about I-130s and I-129Fs. Maybe, just maybe, the changes are good policy!

[David & Diana R 1,005]

No it did not, very frustratingly. It only included the two links I pasted containing the long legal mumbo-jumbo about the proposed changes. Why would they ask for comments and then not provide a venue for us to comment in? I don't think I even want to know.

Uh? Maybe they don't really want comments? El Presidente is writing his own laws. Is he not?

I thought it was a little funny.

So did I

...and maybe you should read the summaries and understand what it's all about before going on a tirade about I-130s and I-129Fs. Maybe, just maybe, the changes are good policy!

Can't we all just get along?

Edited May 13, 2014 by David & Zoila

[thedude6752000 360]

But they can't make these changes to the detriment of I-130 and I-129F filers again! DACA and a lot of other of things might be good policies, but they should not come at the expense of the immediate relatives of US citizens, who according to US immigration law are the #1 priority.

Thank you for pointing that out though.

[Gjhdlab31 10]

Obama writing the laws has nothing to do with how USCIS chooses to handle these cases. It is all about prioritizing and management. If USCIS handle each case in the order in which they are received, we will all have our loved ones here eventually. Fussing and ranting is not going to make anything better. Blaming the President is not going to help either.

[TBoneTX 43,432]

No worries, my gripe was more directed at the mod than you. Mod, may I please start a new thread?

This thread belongs exactly where the VJ Organizer moved it, for the reason stated. A VJ Moderator has merged the duplicate threads. One thread per topic is plenty. Thanks.

[vkrishn 97]

Well actually I am not sure. How are we supposed to comment on this. There is no indication in the email or on their wesbite! I will call customer service but I doubt that they will know.

Here you go.

http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketBrowser;rpp=25;po=0;D=USCIS-2010-0017

[LmmL 46]

This is another example of King Obama ignoring Congress to make his own laws.

Was the previous presidents better than him? Will the new president make any different on how USCIS works?

#JustSayin'