Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
dwheels76

USCIS Publishes Forms for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals‏

15 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

USCIS Publishes Forms for Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals‏

WASHINGTON— Today, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) submitted a Federal Register notice announcing new forms and instructions to allow individuals to request consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals from USCIS. USCIS will begin accepting completed forms tomorrow , August 15, 2012. On June 15, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano announced that certain people who came to the United States as children and meet other key guidelines may request, on a case-by-case basis, consideration of deferred action.

For the complete News Release, please visit USCIS Publishes Forms for Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals on the www.uscis.gov website.


Case Complete to Interview spreadsheet

From now on your VJ Member name will be verified. If the name you put on form to be added to spreadsheet comes up not found, you will not be added to the spreadsheet. If you don't have a timeline you will not be added to the spreadsheet.
Please Please put your VJ member name only. Not nicknames or real names whatever your VJ name is. It's below your profile picture!!

:goofy:


Come join the current Interview thread: 

 

Case-Complete-to-Interview-January-2019/

Case Complete to Interview Form
Case Complete to Interview Spreadsheet
NVC Filers Wiki Process

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

USCIS Publishes Forms for Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals‏

WASHINGTON— Today, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) submitted a Federal Register notice announcing new forms and instructions to allow individuals to request consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals from USCIS. USCIS will begin accepting completed forms tomorrow , August 15, 2012. On June 15, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano announced that certain people who came to the United States as children and meet other key guidelines may request, on a case-by-case basis, consideration of deferred action.

For the complete News Release, please visit USCIS Publishes Forms for Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals on the www.uscis.gov website.

Will these applications go into the back of line or will they get to bypass all the other applications? This new action is beyond ridiculous and is a slap on the face of all who filed legally.


7/24/2012 - I-130 sent to Chicago lockbox
7/27/2012 - NOA1 via text/email - Case forwarded to VSC.
8/01/2012 - NOA1 received in mail
3/06/2013 - NOA2 received text

3/18/2013 - NVC received case (no case # yet)
4/01/2013 - NVC Case# & IIN number received
4/01/2013 - DS-3032 Generated
4/01/2013 - DS-3032 Sent (via email)
4/01/2013 - AOS fee invoiced
4/01/2013 - AOS fee paid (but shows "in process")
4/03/2013 - AOS packet sent
4/04/2013 - AOS received @ NVC
4/05/2013 - AOS fee shows as paid
4/09/2013 - IV fee invoiced
4/09/2013 - IV fee paid (but shows "in process")
4/10/2013 - IV packet sent
4/11/2013 - IV packet received @ NVC
4/17/2013 - AOS package accepted - False checklist for IV package generated
4/23/2013 - Case Complete

5/01/2013 - Interview date received

6/12/2013 - Interview Scheduled-- APPROVED!

6/28/3013 - POE - Atlanta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Will these applications go into the back of line or will they get to bypass all the other applications? This new action is beyond ridiculous and is a slap on the face of all who filed legally.
USCIS is almost certainly under considerable political pressure to process these as a top priority. 0bama needs to show movement on this in order to trumpet success and (presumably) gain Hispanic votes before the November election.

However, no new USCIS personnel have been hired to handle the influx, no extra funds have been allocated for processing, and no personnel WILL be hired until the income from the $465 applications is enough to do so. (The illegals can apply for a fee waiver, too, so an unknown number of "free" applications will have to be processed.)


06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will these applications go into the back of line or will they get to bypass all the other applications? This new action is beyond ridiculous and is a slap on the face of all who filed legally.

I so agree that this is a slap in the face, especially to those filing right now and paying fees. These folks will be bumped up because it is an election year and Obama wants and needs the votes.

I'm not opposed to fee waivers for children born on American soil. They didn't choose this life for themselves, nor did they ask for it. But all adults should go through the same process and FEES as the rest of us are to get our spouses, fiancees, etc., here and they should have to face the same criteria of income and assets so they also do not become a public charge.

To add... :ot: Don't get me started on Welfare and Child support!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have question

why the heck should we ALL suffer for the short comings of the parents not providing greencards for their kids as growing up maybe we all should show our support for the DNC and complain and vote them hell OUT of office as this is only for election votes




Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will these applications go into the back of line or will they get to bypass all the other applications? This new action is beyond ridiculous and is a slap on the face of all who filed legally.

They will go on the pile along with all new applications. All applications are filed legally, even those which are denied, regardless of type of visa or situation.


200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They will go on the pile along with all new applications.
This is the second thread in which you've claimed this. Link & source, please.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is how all applications are handed.

"HandLed," more likely. Please don't underestimate the political priority of this new program. It was by Executive Order just months before the upcoming election. If you have a link + source, please provide it; if not, see preceding sentence. Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have question

why the heck should we ALL suffer for the short comings of the parents not providing greencards for their kids as growing up maybe we all should show our support for the DNC and complain and vote them hell OUT of office as this is only for election votes

I concur...it my best diplomatic voice! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking that if we collectively sent a petition to request that applications be distributed so that they have a fair shot at being processed in a reasonable time frame (i.e. less than 5 months) that might be more effective then sending individual letters to congressmen/women.

I do realize that VJ is non affiliated but with public information, we can easily tell there is a delay going on. Obviously USCIS is under no obligation to do anything, sometimes making a little noise gets somebody higher up putting pressure on the right person. My experience with gov't organizations is that they don't have financial reasons to work efficiently, but it only takes a little incentive from the right entity to get things moving.

The squeaky wheel gets the oil, but no employee at the VSC is going to squeak for us.

I made this on signon.org. I tried to be considerate of others who are waiting.

http://signon.org/sign/help-keep-legal-immigrants?source=c.url&r_by=5349797


06/20/2012 -- I-129F mailed

06/28/2012 -- NOA1 VSC

12/31/2012 -- NOA2

01/08/2013 -- Left NVC

01/11/2013 -- Arrived at Embassy

01/17/2013 -- Received Packet 3

02/05/2013 -- Interview (APPROVED)

02/08/2013 -- Received Passport with Visa

02/16/2013 -- Arrive in US

SIGN OUR PETITION to Speed Up Visa Processing!

event.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking that if we collectively sent a petition to request that applications be distributed so that they have a fair shot at being processed in a reasonable time frame (i.e. less than 5 months) that might be more effective then sending individual letters to congressmen/women.

I do realize that VJ is non affiliated but with public information, we can easily tell there is a delay going on. Obviously USCIS is under no obligation to do anything, sometimes making a little noise gets somebody higher up putting pressure on the right person. My experience with gov't organizations is that they don't have financial reasons to work efficiently, but it only takes a little incentive from the right entity to get things moving.

The squeaky wheel gets the oil, but no employee at the VSC is going to squeak for us.

I made this on signon.org. I tried to be considerate of others who are waiting.

http://signon.org/sign/help-keep-legal-immigrants?source=c.url&r_by=5349797

Just signed up. Need more awareness of this petition. Hopefully it helps.


7/24/2012 - I-130 sent to Chicago lockbox
7/27/2012 - NOA1 via text/email - Case forwarded to VSC.
8/01/2012 - NOA1 received in mail
3/06/2013 - NOA2 received text

3/18/2013 - NVC received case (no case # yet)
4/01/2013 - NVC Case# & IIN number received
4/01/2013 - DS-3032 Generated
4/01/2013 - DS-3032 Sent (via email)
4/01/2013 - AOS fee invoiced
4/01/2013 - AOS fee paid (but shows "in process")
4/03/2013 - AOS packet sent
4/04/2013 - AOS received @ NVC
4/05/2013 - AOS fee shows as paid
4/09/2013 - IV fee invoiced
4/09/2013 - IV fee paid (but shows "in process")
4/10/2013 - IV packet sent
4/11/2013 - IV packet received @ NVC
4/17/2013 - AOS package accepted - False checklist for IV package generated
4/23/2013 - Case Complete

5/01/2013 - Interview date received

6/12/2013 - Interview Scheduled-- APPROVED!

6/28/3013 - POE - Atlanta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TBoneTX.... I 10000% agree with your opinion. lets see where all of our petitions (filed and PAID FOR months ago) end up on the priority list now....


05/02/12 - I-129F sent

5/04/12 - I-129F NOA1

11/15/12 - Approved I-129F NOA2 (6.5 months!!)

11/29/12 - NVC Received

12/10/12 - USEM Case Received

12/12/12 - Packet 3

12/21/12 - Packet 4

1/16/13 - Medical Exam

1/17/13 - Interview- computers crashed.... or so they claim!

1/28/13 - New interview date- Admin. Processing

2/4/13 - Denial- No waiver can apply

July 14 2013 - Moved to Vienna with my dog and 3 suitcases!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×