Jump to content

11 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
http://news.yahoo.com/black-pastors-bash-naacp-endorsing-gay-marriage-201708256.html

By Meagan Clark - The Daily Caller | The Daily Caller – 3 hrs ago

The Coalition of African American Pastors announced Tuesday that it does not agree with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s decision to endorse the legalization of same-sex marriage.

CAAP launched a petition last week to oppose broadening the legal definition of marriage.

The coalition includes leaders of black churches and veteran civil rights leaders who marched with Martin Luther King Jr.

The NAACP voted to endorse same-sex marriage Saturday, and NAACP President Benjamin Jealous publicly endorsed gay marriage Monday.

“The NAACP has abandoned its historic responsibility to speak for and safeguard the civil rights movement,” CAAP founder and President William Owens said Tuesday. “We who marched with Rev. King did not march one inch or one mile to promote same-sex marriage.”

Jealous called gay marriage a civil right, and said he believes “it is the responsibility, the history of the NAACP to speak up on the civil rights issues of our times.”

CAAP says it believes gay Americans should have equal civil rights, but that it does not believe there should be a right to legally marry someone of the same sex.

On behalf of the coalition, Owens said, “We call on all Americans to respect the legitimate civil rights of gay people to be free from violence, harassment, to vote, to hold jobs.”

Owens drew from King’s “Letter From Birmingham Jail” to explain what he believes is the difference between a just and unjust law.

According to Owens, a just law is a man-made code that squares with the law of God, and an unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with moral law.

Owens also drew from St. Thomas Aquinas and said, “An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.”

“Same-sex marriage is an attempt to do the opposite of what Rev. King did,” Owens said. “It’s an attempt by men to use political power to declare that an act contrary to God’s law and to the natural law is a civil right.”

CAAP held a press conference last week in Memphis, where King died, to call on President Barack Obama to reconsider his support for gay marriage.

“Our only weapons in this fight are the weapons of Rev. King: truth and love and courage,” Owens said.

sigbet.jpg

"I want to take this opportunity to mention how thankful I am for an Obama re-election. The choice was clear. We cannot live in a country that treats homosexuals and women as second class citizens. Homosexuals deserve all of the rights and benefits of marriage that heterosexuals receive. Women deserve to be treated with respect and their salaries should not depend on their gender, but their quality of work. I am also thankful that the great, progressive state of California once again voted for the correct President. America is moving forward, and the direction is a positive one."

Posted

The Coalition of African American Pastors is a group of gay black men. They're scared of what legalizing gay marriage would mean for them. You know the feeling, Kip, don't you?

No actually I don't. Tell me more about these "feelings" you talk of.

sigbet.jpg

"I want to take this opportunity to mention how thankful I am for an Obama re-election. The choice was clear. We cannot live in a country that treats homosexuals and women as second class citizens. Homosexuals deserve all of the rights and benefits of marriage that heterosexuals receive. Women deserve to be treated with respect and their salaries should not depend on their gender, but their quality of work. I am also thankful that the great, progressive state of California once again voted for the correct President. America is moving forward, and the direction is a positive one."

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted (edited)

I remember studying about some new states laws, when I was in junior high, removing any ban on 'different race' marriages. That was the mid seventies(when I studied, not when they went into effect).. I wonder how same sex marriage campaign will change, now that the NAACP threw their hat into the ring.

Edited by Darnell

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ireland
Timeline
Posted

***** 18 (!!!) posts removed. Discuss the article in the OP in a civil manner or don't post. This is your only warning, thread bans and suspensions will be next ****

Bye: Penguin

Me: Irish/ Swiss citizen, and now naturalised US citizen. Husband: USC; twin babies born Feb 08 in Ireland and a daughter in Feb 2010 in Arkansas who are all joint Irish/ USC. Did DCF (IR1) in 6 weeks via the Dublin, Ireland embassy and now living in Arkansas.

mod penguin.jpg

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

I can't, cause I don't have them. You're the one that's somehow scared of marriage equality. I'm not. I'm cool with it. Doesn't have any impact on me and my marriage. But it sure seems to scare the bejesus out of you. I've tried to figure out why that could be and can come up with only one explanation: you're scared that your gay lover will demand you divorce your wife and marry him instead. If that's not it, I don't see how two guys or two gals getting married has any impact on you and your wife. Or are you scared that your wife would leave you for a chick?

Well actually you are afraid of marriage equality yourself which is why you and the rest of you phony "gay rights" folks limit your "understanding" to homosexuals and not the millions of other people who also want to form marriage as their families would like.

In fact you are so plastic your team is still making the Bi-sexual choose -One or the other.

Sorry dude if you want a free ride go back to Huffington post.

:rofl:

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline
Posted

Obviously these pastors have no recollection of a time when marriage was only between a white man and a white women, all other permutations forbidden.

Far more important however, is the fact they seem not to realize that the First Amendment completely precludes the need for their approval in this matter, our Founding Fathers having the foresight to ensure the new nation was and should remain secular.

Truly, anyone against same-sex marriage should simply just not marry a person of the same gender. Case closed.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Posted

Truly, anyone against same-sex marriage should simply just not marry a person of the same gender. Case closed.

That would be too easy, to live and let live. Some people feel the need to have a say in how other people live their lives, whether it impacts them or not.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Truly, anyone against same-sex marriage should simply just not marry a person of the same gender. Case closed.

That would be simple. But there seem to be some who are afraid that either they secret gay lovers will propose to them or that their wives will leave them for some chick. So, marriage equality would have a direct impact on them and that's why they're worried about it.

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

Should two consentual adults be given the right to get married? In my opinion, absolutely. That's why I support two people's right to marry regardless of race, nationality, citizenship, religion, social status, age (18+ obviously), sexual orientation etc, etc.

Should a church/mosque/synagogue/temple/ordained minister be allowed to refuse to marry homosexual couples. In my opinion, absolutely. That's called freedom of religion.

Bottom line, in a free country, I don't see any logical reason why two adult human beings who both consent should not be allowed to get married. As long as the "right to refuse service" is given to ministers, I really don't see what the problem is.

I equally support anyone's right to hold the opposite opinion.

Edited by jaejayC
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...