Jump to content
Obama 2012

Oops. Poster Couple for "Gay" Rights Is Getting Divorced

 Share

39 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline

Amusing to say the least...

I'll attack her on something she said though:

""For a bunch of people to tell me who I can love, who I can marry, who I can say this is my person, this is who I choose to spend the rest of my life with, it's mindboggling to me that a few religious people can vote for our equal rights,""

The only thing no one said you could do it get married at a government office. No one said you can't say this is your person, no one stopped you from privately getting married, no one stopped you from living together, etc. None of your damn "right" were violated at all. Now guess what, no one is stopping from from getting divorced either after you apparently didn't want to be with that person all of your life.... so quityerbitchin'!!!!

------------------

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/08/10350972-poster-couple-for-gay-rights-in-california-is-divorcing

By Irene Moore and Cary Berglund, NBCLosAngeles.com

When gay couples first sought the right to legally wed in California, they argued that they were entitled to all of the benefits of marital bliss.

It was only a matter of time before that benefit extended to the right to split up.

Even as the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found California's ban on gay marriage unconstitutional Tuesday, one of the state's first gay couples to tie the knot was calling it quits.

Robin Tyler filed for divorce from Diane Olson on Jan. 25. The pair were among 14 same-sex couples who originally challenged the ban in 2008.

In an exclusive interview with NBC4, Tyler spoke about her decision.

"We're human and we went through difficult times," Tyler said. The marriage ran its course, she said.

Tyler and Olson have known each other for 40 years and were together as a couple for 18. They were the poster couple for gay and lesbian rights.

When they wed, in June of 2008, they had gone to the Beverly Hills Courthouse every year for seven years to apply for -- and be denied -- a marriage license.

The ceremony on the steps of the same courthouse was a monumental moment for gay couples everywhere.

"I don't know how to describe it -- I wanted this all my life," Olson told the Jewish Journal that day. "Every time I went to a girlfriend's wedding, and when my brother got married, it was something I always wanted for myself. It looks like God must have wanted it for me, too."

In November 2008 voters passed Prop. 8, banning gay marriage. Tyler and the thousands of other gay and lesbian couples who wed before Nov. 4, 2008, were allowed to remain married but same-sex couples who wanted to get married were forbidden under the new law.

During the prolonged litigation over Prop. 8, Olson marveled at the scope of the ban. "For a bunch of people to tell me who I can love, who I can marry, who I can say this is my person, this is who I choose to spend the rest of my life with, it's mindboggling to me that a few religious people can vote for our equal rights," she said.

Reflecting on their marriage in August of 2010, Tyler said: "Marriage is so important it's the most important relationship that you can have as an adult when you get older."

But even the best of marriages can come to an end. The right to marry wasn't meant to guarantee that gay couples would live happily ever after, Tyler said, but to provide a basic human civil liberty.

Tyler said her marital problems were no different than if the two parties had been a man and woman. Gays and lesbians shouldn't be held to a different standard when granted the same civil rights as everyone else, she said.

"What is the standard to expect when you integrate equality," Tyler asked. "We're just like anybody else and that's all they can expect of us."

Edited by ♫

nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can she still marry a toaster?

Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

I always worried about the legality of divorcing, ie - whatever state passes a law to allow the marriage - they need to pass another law to allow the divorce.

Isn't it just easier to move to Canada, where this stuff has been allowed for a decade already?

Yay Canada! Poutine Rocks !

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline

One of the rights of marriage is to get divorced and have equitable division of property, custody agreements, etc. When straight people have a divorce rate of 50%, I don't think there's much room for criticism that a gay couple is getting divorced. Gay people don't want access to the institution of marriage to be in competition with straight people - they just want the same rights and responsibilities in their spousal relationship and that includes the right to dissolve that marriage.

and you need government to tell you this? You need government to validate how you feel about someone?

Kind of pathetic if that's the case.

nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found out it is best to unplug a toaster before you try to have sex with it

Did you find that out the hard way?

Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why aren't all these states allowing polygamy now?

If gays are allowed to get married, why can't someone have multiple partners?

Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: France
Timeline

Amusing to say the least...

I'll attack her on something she said though:

""For a bunch of people to tell me who I can love, who I can marry, who I can say this is my person, this is who I choose to spend the rest of my life with, it's mindboggling to me that a few religious people can vote for our equal rights,""

The only thing no one said you could do it get married at a government office. No one said you can't say this is your person, no one stopped you from privately getting married, no one stopped you from living together, etc. None of your damn "right" were violated at all. Now guess what, no one is stopping from from getting divorced either after you apparently didn't want to be with that person all of your life.... so quityerbitchin'!!!!

------------------

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/08/10350972-poster-couple-for-gay-rights-in-california-is-divorcing

By Irene Moore and Cary Berglund, NBCLosAngeles.com

When gay couples first sought the right to legally wed in California, they argued that they were entitled to all of the benefits of marital bliss.

It was only a matter of time before that benefit extended to the right to split up.

Even as the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found California's ban on gay marriage unconstitutional Tuesday, one of the state's first gay couples to tie the knot was calling it quits.

Robin Tyler filed for divorce from Diane Olson on Jan. 25. The pair were among 14 same-sex couples who originally challenged the ban in 2008.

In an exclusive interview with NBC4, Tyler spoke about her decision.

"We're human and we went through difficult times," Tyler said. The marriage ran its course, she said.

Tyler and Olson have known each other for 40 years and were together as a couple for 18. They were the poster couple for gay and lesbian rights.

When they wed, in June of 2008, they had gone to the Beverly Hills Courthouse every year for seven years to apply for -- and be denied -- a marriage license.

The ceremony on the steps of the same courthouse was a monumental moment for gay couples everywhere.

"I don't know how to describe it -- I wanted this all my life," Olson told the Jewish Journal that day. "Every time I went to a girlfriend's wedding, and when my brother got married, it was something I always wanted for myself. It looks like God must have wanted it for me, too."

In November 2008 voters passed Prop. 8, banning gay marriage. Tyler and the thousands of other gay and lesbian couples who wed before Nov. 4, 2008, were allowed to remain married but same-sex couples who wanted to get married were forbidden under the new law.

During the prolonged litigation over Prop. 8, Olson marveled at the scope of the ban. "For a bunch of people to tell me who I can love, who I can marry, who I can say this is my person, this is who I choose to spend the rest of my life with, it's mindboggling to me that a few religious people can vote for our equal rights," she said.

Reflecting on their marriage in August of 2010, Tyler said: "Marriage is so important it's the most important relationship that you can have as an adult when you get older."

But even the best of marriages can come to an end. The right to marry wasn't meant to guarantee that gay couples would live happily ever after, Tyler said, but to provide a basic human civil liberty.

Tyler said her marital problems were no different than if the two parties had been a man and woman. Gays and lesbians shouldn't be held to a different standard when granted the same civil rights as everyone else, she said.

"What is the standard to expect when you integrate equality," Tyler asked. "We're just like anybody else and that's all they can expect of us."

I just wish the government would remove you the right to be married to a non-US citizen. Just so you would think twice before saying getting married should not be a right for other people.

So much hatered is bad for your karma.

CR1 Visa

USCIS STAGE: 16 days No expedite request but USC residing abroad
NVC STAGE: 19 days from case # to case complete
EMBASSY STAGE
03/27/12: interview - APPROVED
04/12/12: POE San Diego

ROC
12/19/14: received reminder letter from USCIS to file for ROC
01/15/14: sent I-751 application

05/14/14: received card production notification by e-mail, approval date 05/13

Naturalization

02/01/24: N-400 submitted online; Biometrics reuse notice received immediately online; "case being actively reviewed" after a couple hours

02/09/24: received NOA1 by mail

02/10/24: received biometrics reuse notice by mail

04/08/24: interview scheduled for 05/14. Received "We have taken an action in your case" email.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline

I just wish the government would remove you the right to be married to a non-US citizen. Just so you would think twice before saying getting married should not be a right for other people.

So much hatered is bad for your karma.

English only please outside of the regional forums.

nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

Did you find that out the hard way?

the instructions just said dont put a fork in it!

I didn't realize it could grab onto you like that.

An there is no safety release

Im just thankful it was set to light and not Dark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

Why aren't all these states allowing polygamy now?

If gays are allowed to get married, why can't someone have multiple partners?

Amen Bro, any state which allows two men to marry should also allow three men to marry.

Every argument for gay marriage will be and is being used in courts right now to allow the absolute freedom to design and define what marriage means to them.

If centuries of customs and tradition are meaningless... why bind people to the very same thing with limiting how many......or even other factors such as cousins marrying cousins?

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

and you need government to tell you this? You need government to validate how you feel about someone?

Kind of pathetic if that's the case.

Of course you don't need the government to validate how you feel about someone - if that's all it was, why would straight people ever get civilly married? However, the government provides rights that come with marriage and one of those rights is equitable distribution of property upon dissolution. I don't think any of us here need the government to tell us who to love and how to feel about them, but it's ironic that you say this on an immigration forum where the vast majority of people do need the government to recognize their relationship in order to be together. The government doesn't regulate the emotions, but they do regulate the laws. Obviously.

AOS (from tourist w/overstay)

1/26/10 - NOA

5/04/10 - interview appt - approved

ROC

2/06/12 - NOA date

7/31/12 - card production ordered

N-400

2/08/13 - NOA date

3/05/13 - biometrics appt

6/18/13 - interview - passed!

7/18/13 - oath ceremony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...