Intolerant People Who Call People "Bigots"

[Peikko 1,575]

I don't know what he will say but certainly Winnie Mandela has

No wonder Nelson called it quits with her

Lemme back in the slammer guys ! Celibacy ain't that bad after all.

Is this an example of your classy repartee? I'll stick with calling people wankers no matter if it does offend your sensibilities. Calling women names simply because you don't find them attractive is beyond icky.

[Captain Oates 910]

I know... your imagination is spot on this time.

I am off to clean some red hair out of the bath drain trap..

I bloody hate gingers - they have hair like steel

Can I say that ?

Edited August 20, 2010 by saywhat

[_Simpson_ 250]

One has to be so careful. I was talking about the British Aviators who were the first to fly the Atlantic (no it wasn't Linberg jeez)

and somebody thought I was having a slur at Mike Tyson..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcock_and_Brown

Yes I know this, did you know that Lindberg's flight was the first to fly nonstop from New York to Paris which was about double the distance of Alcock and brown's flight?

Edited August 20, 2010 by _Simpson_

[HAL 9000 96]

I am off to clean some red hair out of the bath drain trap..

I bloody hate gingers - they have hair like steel

Can I say that ?

Redheaded scalps have the highest rate of hair turnover out of all other hair colors. Good luck with that and do try to wear gloves. Icky. Other than that you should be fine.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Once again, it does not mean NOTHING, it is very meaningful, but it does not allow you to conclude that black Americans are more liable to commit crimes because criminality is simply part of their culture.

I don't care if you explain comments made years ago or not, I am asking you if you still believe the same rubbish. Do you still believe that it is not suprising that Black Americans embrace a criminal culture for example?

Why does it not?

If you look at Africa today and Africa over the course of the past several decades, even Century, it's been the same way... Constant wars, millions dead and killed by their own countrymen.... It's a never ending circle it would seem. No one 'knows' for sure, or they haven't tested it really. One thing is for sure though, is another who dares to suggest such a thing is labelled a 'bigot' or a 'racist' or something far worse for making painfully obvious observations.

[Captain Oates 910]

Yes I know this, did you know that Lindberg's flight was the first to fly nonstop from New York to Paris which was about double the distance of Alcock and brown's flight?

I thought the American right disliked France - so why go there ? I don't understand it because if it wasn't for the French, you would all be speaking English.

Anyway, we were first and America was second and that's all the counts. It was us that captured the ENIGMA code machine on the U110 south of Iceland not the US as it was in the hollywood film and we invented penicillin just in time for the US army to take their R&R in Bangkok

and even in her eighties, the Queen is better looking than Joan Rivers so barbecue that !

Edited August 20, 2010 by saywhat

[Peikko 1,575]

Why does it not?

If you look at Africa today and Africa over the course of the past several decades, even Century, it's been the same way... Constant wars, millions dead and killed by their own countrymen.... It's a never ending circle it would seem. No one 'knows' for sure, or they haven't tested it really. One thing is for sure though, is another who dares to suggest such a thing is labelled a 'bigot' or a 'racist' or something far worse for making painfully obvious observations.

Just because you wallow in ignorance does not mean that everyone else does. You don't know why Africa has problems but yet you can see why these problems should be laid squarely at the door of some kind of cultural inferiority of the indigenous peoples of Africa? Yeah, that's a good one Paul.

[HAL 9000 96]

Why does it not?

If you look at Africa today and Africa over the course of the past several decades, even Century, it's been the same way... Constant wars, millions dead and killed by their own countrymen.... It's a never ending circle it would seem. No one 'knows' for sure, or they haven't tested it really. One thing is for sure though, is another who dares to suggest such a thing is labelled a 'bigot' or a 'racist' or something far worse for making painfully obvious observations.

Europeans exported their wars and their colonialism there if you'd care to crack open a history book. Before then they were pretty much as barbaric as European nations were in butchering each other.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Just because you wallow in ignorance does not mean that everyone else does. You don't know why Africa has problems but yet you can see why these problems should be laid squarely at the door of some kind of cultural inferiority of the indigenous peoples of Africa? Yeah, that's a good one Paul.

See, there's your problem. All I said was it's not too far off to possibly equate black-on-black crime here and black-on-black crime in Africa when you compare other cultures around the world. It's a fair comparison until proven to be false. There's nothing 'ignorant' about it.

Europeans exported their wars and their colonialism there if you'd care to crack open a history book. Before then they were pretty much as barbaric as European nations were in butchering each other.

Oh, so the "white man" forced and still forces blacks to keep fighting each other. Oh, I gotcha. That's how it is. How horribly wrong could I have been that a culture is responsible for itself.

I mean after all, history is wrong. Blacks didn't sell other blacks to the whites. I mean they didn't sell their brothers into slavery. Oh, my bad.

[BobandXiaomei 14]

Europeans exported their wars and their colonialism there if you'd care to crack open a history book. Before then they were pretty much as barbaric as European nations were in butchering each other.

READ!? Wait a minute! Reading my contradict my pre-conceived ideas of the world!

[HAL 9000 96]

See, there's your problem. All I said was it's not too far off to possibly equate black-on-black crime here and black-on-black crime in Africa when you compare other cultures around the world. It's a fair comparison until proven to be false. There's nothing 'ignorant' about it.

Oh, so the "white man" forced and still forces blacks to keep fighting each other. Oh, I gotcha. That's how it is. How horribly wrong could I have been that a culture is responsible for itself.

I mean after all, history is wrong. Blacks didn't sell other blacks to the whites. I mean they didn't sell their brothers into slavery. Oh, my bad.

Is that what I said?

No, its not. Get a grip Paul- colonialism has had some very measurable repercussions on the cultures it manipulated. You clearly can't be that ignorant.

READ!? Wait a minute! Reading my contradict my pre-conceived ideas of the world!

Particularly when the second sentence of my post was fairly evident. I guess Paul missed that.

Although Paul does have a knack for interpreting history and historical documents in a very... peculiar way.

[Heracles 417]

Once again, it does not mean NOTHING, it is very meaningful, but it does not allow you to conclude that black Americans are more liable to commit crimes because criminality is simply part of their culture.

I don't care if you explain comments made years ago or not, I am asking you if you still believe the same rubbish. Do you still believe that it is not suprising that Black Americans embrace a criminal culture for example?

While have nine to twenty times the homicide rate per 100,000 means "NOTHING" to you, it means a hell of a lot to those of us in the first world. Money says though that you do not live in the areas you so adamantly defend. Go live in the ghettos of Chicago and then come talk to me.

You don't care yet you bring it up. No Cleo, the ghetto culture is one that strives for civility, education and legitimate prosperity.

[HappyKnappy 30]

Is that what I said?

No, its not. Get a grip Paul- colonialism has had some very measurable repercussions on the cultures it manipulated. You clearly can't be that ignorant.

Particularly when the second sentence of my post was fairly evident. I guess Paul missed that.

Although Paul does have a knack for interpreting history and historical documents in a very... peculiar way.

18 pages to have a full backlash against the OP, must be a new record.

[HAL 9000 96]

18 pages to have a full backlash against the OP, must be a new record.

Against the OP itself... against particular thread 'owners' is another story... some are legends in their own little way.

[Peikko 1,575]

See, there's your problem. All I said was it's not too far off to possibly equate black-on-black crime here and black-on-black crime in Africa when you compare other cultures around the world. It's a fair comparison until proven to be false. There's nothing 'ignorant' about it.

Oh, so the "white man" forced and still forces blacks to keep fighting each other. Oh, I gotcha. That's how it is. How horribly wrong could I have been that a culture is responsible for itself.

I mean after all, history is wrong. Blacks didn't sell other blacks to the whites. I mean they didn't sell their brothers into slavery. Oh, my bad.

What is a fair comparison? What is your conclusion about black people in relation to white ones Paul?