BORN IN THE USA?

[tmma 467]

You're great at posting pics...But not so much explaining why you think it is that he ( or anyone) should not have to prove citizenship-which I think ( especially on this site where we have all had to prove eligibility and citizenship and jump through hoops to prove eligibility for various reasons) is strange....

It is shiznit that could be ended quickly......

I think the whole assumption that the President is not a born USC is beyond absurd. Really.

Well, I don't know about anyone else, but I'm assuming nothing other than everyone elses BC is public record and everyone else has to provide it to prove citizenship or eligibility, why the big stink about him having to do what every other American has to....?

[EstebanTrabajos 7]

[The_Dude 1,142]

Why rolling eyes? Everyone has to prove eligibility for employment , don't they? He got the job as Prez, and if some of his 'employers' want verification ( which we ALL have to provide when we take a job)....So what? Plus it would stop the whole 'he isn't American ' crud....So time and resources in the CA court system can be spent on other things ( like sorting out MJ's messed up finances and other important things like that......)

yes, you do have to prove your eligibilty for employment.... to your companies HR department. Should you have to carry around your employment authorization forms with you to show random people whom you work with? This is retarded, and once again, it's a WorldNet Daily posting........

Yes, actually some people ( alot on here, actually) DO have to carry around with them their employment auth cards/green cards that prove eligibility....Suprised you would think that's 'retarded'.....

Because it is. You have no obligation to prove to people who you work with that you are eligible to work. You do that when you are being processed with human resources.

Ok-well, did he provide proof when he was being 'processed'? PLUS it may be 'retarded' in your opinion, but doesn't USCIS tell Conditional and LPRs to keep their GC and/or EAD on then at all times incase of examination by an official? Well, even if I think it's silly this hoopla over BHO's citizenship-if an official ( like the court system) asks for his eligibility...He should provide it....IMO-Equal treatment for ALL and all that.

You are supposed to carry your GC at all times to prove your status. The EAD thing is news to me. Why on earth would you though? Why is it anyones obligation to prove to their co-workers or people who work beneath their supervision their employment status? There are several foreign born people whom I work with, I don't assume that they are here illegally and demand to see their EAD and GC. That is preposterous and not even legal.

Why doesn't the president oblige the fringe and show him the documented paperwork? Why should he perpetuate this. He submitted his birth certificate when he filed his candidacy. If the conspiracy theorists refuse to accept it, so be it, but he has fulfilled his legal obligation.

[Peikko 1,575]

Why rolling eyes? Everyone has to prove eligibility for employment , don't they? He got the job as Prez, and if some of his 'employers' want verification ( which we ALL have to provide when we take a job)....So what? Plus it would stop the whole 'he isn't American ' crud....So time and resources in the CA court system can be spent on other things ( like sorting out MJ's messed up finances and other important things like that......)

yes, you do have to prove your eligibilty for employment.... to your companies HR department. Should you have to carry around your employment authorization forms with you to show random people whom you work with? This is retarded, and once again, it's a WorldNet Daily posting........

Yes, actually some people ( alot on here, actually) DO have to carry around with them their employment auth cards/green cards that prove eligibility....Suprised you would think that's 'retarded'.....

Because it is. You have no obligation to prove to people who you work with that you are eligible to work. You do that when you are being processed with human resources.

This sort of thinking brought us Nazism and other proud dictators - who knew?

So you think it's OK for regular folks who have a GC to be forced to carry it and produce it on demand Nazism? You're right-I didn't know!

Personally, yes I do, and I don't. However, the GC question is not what is at stake in this instance. The president is a US citizen, and like all US citizens has no obligation to answer any such questions or carry around identification.

[SMOKE 1,426]

You're great at posting pics...But not so much explaining why you think it is that he ( or anyone) should not have to prove citizenship-which I think ( especially on this site where we have all had to prove eligibility and citizenship and jump through hoops to prove eligibility for various reasons) is strange....

It is shiznit that could be ended quickly......

I think the whole assumption that the President is not a born USC is beyond absurd. Really.

honestly len which is more absurd?

the question coming up every other day? or Obama's refusal to produce documentation to end all the questioning?

Edited July 14, 2009 by SMOKE

[NArocks 13]

Dis gettin GOOD

[The_Dude 1,142]

You're great at posting pics...But not so much explaining why you think it is that he ( or anyone) should not have to prove citizenship-which I think ( especially on this site where we have all had to prove eligibility and citizenship and jump through hoops to prove eligibility for various reasons) is strange....

It is shiznit that could be ended quickly......

I think the whole assumption that the President is not a born USC is beyond absurd. Really.

honestly len which is more absurd?

the question coming up every other day? or Obama's refusal to produce documentation to end all the questioning?

Both are equally absurd and devoid of any validity...

[EstebanTrabajos 7]

what if he is an alien? we have been fooled! to the mothership!

[tmma 467]

Why rolling eyes? Everyone has to prove eligibility for employment , don't they? He got the job as Prez, and if some of his 'employers' want verification ( which we ALL have to provide when we take a job)....So what? Plus it would stop the whole 'he isn't American ' crud....So time and resources in the CA court system can be spent on other things ( like sorting out MJ's messed up finances and other important things like that......)

yes, you do have to prove your eligibilty for employment.... to your companies HR department. Should you have to carry around your employment authorization forms with you to show random people whom you work with? This is retarded, and once again, it's a WorldNet Daily posting........

Yes, actually some people ( alot on here, actually) DO have to carry around with them their employment auth cards/green cards that prove eligibility....Suprised you would think that's 'retarded'.....

Because it is. You have no obligation to prove to people who you work with that you are eligible to work. You do that when you are being processed with human resources.

Ok-well, did he provide proof when he was being 'processed'? PLUS it may be 'retarded' in your opinion, but doesn't USCIS tell Conditional and LPRs to keep their GC and/or EAD on then at all times incase of examination by an official? Well, even if I think it's silly this hoopla over BHO's citizenship-if an official ( like the court system) asks for his eligibility...He should provide it....IMO-Equal treatment for ALL and all that.

You are supposed to carry your GC at all times to prove your status. The EAD thing is news to me. Why on earth would you though? Why is it anyones obligation to prove to their co-workers or people who work beneath their supervision their employment status? There are several foreign born people whom I work with, I don't assume that they are here illegally and demand to see their EAD and GC. That is preposterous and not even legal.

Why doesn't the president oblige the fringe and show him the documented paperwork? Why should he perpetuate this. He submitted his birth certificate when he filed his candidacy. If the conspiracy theorists refuse to accept it, so be it, but he has fulfilled his legal obligation.

He provided it already? Cool! What's the big clusterfick about then? It's public record like all of ours, lets see it!

I think you are right, of course underlings at work cannot and should not demand squat...but if an official or employer demands to see it-that's different, no?

[The_Dude 1,142]

what if he is an alien? we have been fooled! to the mothership!

Tavo, turn off el rushbo and get back to work

[SMOKE 1,426]

You're great at posting pics...But not so much explaining why you think it is that he ( or anyone) should not have to prove citizenship-which I think ( especially on this site where we have all had to prove eligibility and citizenship and jump through hoops to prove eligibility for various reasons) is strange....

It is shiznit that could be ended quickly......

I think the whole assumption that the President is not a born USC is beyond absurd. Really.

honestly len which is more absurd?

the question coming up every other day? or Obama's refusal to produce documentation to end all the questioning?

Both are equally absurd and devoid of any validity...

yes they both are. but, 1 man can end it all with 1 document. don't you find it odd he won't produce it?

[NickD 202]

Why rolling eyes? Everyone has to prove eligibility for employment , don't they? He got the job as Prez, and if some of his 'employers' want verification ( which we ALL have to provide when we take a job)....So what? Plus it would stop the whole 'he isn't American ' crud....So time and resources in the CA court system can be spent on other things ( like sorting out MJ's messed up finances and other important things like that......)

yes, you do have to prove your eligibilty for employment.... to your companies HR department. Should you have to carry around your employment authorization forms with you to show random people whom you work with? This is retarded, and once again, it's a WorldNet Daily posting........

Yes, actually some people ( alot on here, actually) DO have to carry around with them their employment auth cards/green cards that prove eligibility....Suprised you would think that's 'retarded'.....

Because it is. You have no obligation to prove to people who you work with that you are eligible to work. You do that when you are being processed with human resources.

This sort of thinking brought us Nazism and other proud dictators - who knew?

So you think it's OK for regular folks who have a GC to be forced to carry it and produce it on demand Nazism? You're right-I didn't know!

Let me see you papers, or card, it's the same thing.

[EstebanTrabajos 7]

Tavo, turn off el rushbo and get back to work

[The_Dude 1,142]

Why rolling eyes? Everyone has to prove eligibility for employment , don't they? He got the job as Prez, and if some of his 'employers' want verification ( which we ALL have to provide when we take a job)....So what? Plus it would stop the whole 'he isn't American ' crud....So time and resources in the CA court system can be spent on other things ( like sorting out MJ's messed up finances and other important things like that......)

yes, you do have to prove your eligibilty for employment.... to your companies HR department. Should you have to carry around your employment authorization forms with you to show random people whom you work with? This is retarded, and once again, it's a WorldNet Daily posting........

Yes, actually some people ( alot on here, actually) DO have to carry around with them their employment auth cards/green cards that prove eligibility....Suprised you would think that's 'retarded'.....

Because it is. You have no obligation to prove to people who you work with that you are eligible to work. You do that when you are being processed with human resources.

Ok-well, did he provide proof when he was being 'processed'? PLUS it may be 'retarded' in your opinion, but doesn't USCIS tell Conditional and LPRs to keep their GC and/or EAD on then at all times incase of examination by an official? Well, even if I think it's silly this hoopla over BHO's citizenship-if an official ( like the court system) asks for his eligibility...He should provide it....IMO-Equal treatment for ALL and all that.

You are supposed to carry your GC at all times to prove your status. The EAD thing is news to me. Why on earth would you though? Why is it anyones obligation to prove to their co-workers or people who work beneath their supervision their employment status? There are several foreign born people whom I work with, I don't assume that they are here illegally and demand to see their EAD and GC. That is preposterous and not even legal.

Why doesn't the president oblige the fringe and show him the documented paperwork? Why should he perpetuate this. He submitted his birth certificate when he filed his candidacy. If the conspiracy theorists refuse to accept it, so be it, but he has fulfilled his legal obligation.

He provided it already? Cool! What's the big clusterfick about then? It's public record like all of ours, lets see it!

I think you are right, of course underlings at work cannot and should not demand squat...but if an official or employer demands to see it-that's different, no?

They can demand to see proof of your status to work in this country when you are processed for employment. It's not something that can, or will ask for on a regular basis. The controversy regarding Obama's birth certificate is a complete load of ####### from a group of nutjobs. Read this article, it outlines the facts and fiction of this controversy. Mostly, it is about people wanting to see the original birth certificate, and not just a scan or a copy provided by the state of Hawaii.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp

[Peikko 1,575]

You're great at posting pics...But not so much explaining why you think it is that he ( or anyone) should not have to prove citizenship-which I think ( especially on this site where we have all had to prove eligibility and citizenship and jump through hoops to prove eligibility for various reasons) is strange....

It is shiznit that could be ended quickly......

I think the whole assumption that the President is not a born USC is beyond absurd. Really.

honestly len which is more absurd?

the question coming up every other day? or Obama's refusal to produce documentation to end all the questioning?

Both are equally absurd and devoid of any validity...

yes they both are. but, 1 man can end it all with 1 document. don't you find it odd he won't produce it?

No, why should he pander to the tin foil hat brigade? It's a nonsense, and he should properly ignore it.