Jump to content

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Venezuela
Timeline
Posted (edited)

4.Declaration of how you met in person in the last two years. This should be a single typed page attachment regarding question 18 of the I-129F. Make sure to sign and date it.

^^from the guide

"Describe the circumstances under which you met. If you have not personally met each other, explain how the relationship was established."

^^from the I-129F

"We first met in person in Merida, Venezuela on June 23rd, 2007 when I was studying abroad. I studied there for one month, then lived with him and his mother as my host family for two months. My last trip to visit him was from April 8th to April 15th, 2009."

^^This is what I wrote for #18. I didnt mention that we first "met" online. Should I put that we first met online? I thought since they didn't count that as "meeting" that they wouldn't care to know about that. Then again, when it comes up in the interview, I don't want them to think we were omitting anything. Also, if it fits in the box, do we still need to use a separate piece of paper and sign and date it?

Edited by GJen

G(Venezuela)Venezuela%20flag-S-anim.gifanimated_earth.gifus-flag-small.gifJen(GA,U.S.)iATxm5.png369549mx7b73btk2.gif




Visajourney.png

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: China
Timeline
Posted

what you wrote is valid, and if it fits in the box then you don't need a seperate sheet of paper. you can write a Evolution of relationship letter and include a timeline of how you meet online until you actually met in person.

UpdatedTimeline.jpg
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Venezuela
Timeline
Posted
what you wrote is valid, and if it fits in the box then you don't need a seperate sheet of paper. you can write a Evolution of relationship letter and include a timeline of how you meet online until you actually met in person.

that's a good idea, would we both need to sign and date it?

G(Venezuela)Venezuela%20flag-S-anim.gifanimated_earth.gifus-flag-small.gifJen(GA,U.S.)iATxm5.png369549mx7b73btk2.gif




Visajourney.png

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Kenya
Timeline
Posted

My immigration lawyer told me that in my Letter of intent I should tell our love story. To make it mushy and show how much we care about each other. The answer to question 4 should be a briefer version of this. I would put in all your meetings and yes put that you FIRST met online. Be honest upfront.

Then again, I have known my finace for less than a year and really need to prove a strong relationship. I think it is rare that you could put too much though, unless it is bad.

If it fits in the box you don't need a separate piece of paper. But it probably won't fit in the box if it is good.

Good Luck

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: China
Timeline
Posted
My immigration lawyer told me that in my Letter of intent I should tell our love story. To make it mushy and show how much we care about each other. The answer to question 4 should be a briefer version of this. I would put in all your meetings and yes put that you FIRST met online. Be honest upfront.

Then again, I have known my finace for less than a year and really need to prove a strong relationship. I think it is rare that you could put too much though, unless it is bad.

If it fits in the box you don't need a separate piece of paper. But it probably won't fit in the box if it is good.

Good Luck

you don't really need to make it "mushy" just make it brief, again. USCIS only wants to know how you met within 2 years in person. you can write another letter and bring it to the interview. the letter is called Evolution of Relationship and this letter can include everything from the begining.

UpdatedTimeline.jpg
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Venezuela
Timeline
Posted
I kept it brief, just enough to fit in the box. I was approved without any problems. I figured that if they wanted a full page story, they would have provided space for a full page story.

yeah, it's not the I-129F that they use to determine if the relationship is bonified, anyway, right? They just want to make sure we've met within the last two years?

G(Venezuela)Venezuela%20flag-S-anim.gifanimated_earth.gifus-flag-small.gifJen(GA,U.S.)iATxm5.png369549mx7b73btk2.gif




Visajourney.png

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted
I kept it brief, just enough to fit in the box. I was approved without any problems. I figured that if they wanted a full page story, they would have provided space for a full page story.

yeah, it's not the I-129F that they use to determine if the relationship is bonified, anyway, right? They just want to make sure we've met within the last two years?

That's true, but I threw in a few things that pointed towards a bonifide relationship as well. ie. a few pics, and 2 copies of envelopes to me from her. I was approved with no RFE.

When your first starting this process it seems really stressful and hard but looking back it was pretty straight forward, I found that the guides and example forms on here really helped a lot.

Posted
I kept it brief, just enough to fit in the box. I was approved without any problems. I figured that if they wanted a full page story, they would have provided space for a full page story.

yeah, it's not the I-129F that they use to determine if the relationship is bonified, anyway, right? They just want to make sure we've met within the last two years?

I would say what you wrote is just perfect.

My own statement was about the same length, just stated the facts and date - no other information.

At the interview is where they ask for evidence of a bonafide relationship - which we are wating for in July.

My Advice is usually based on "Worst Case Scenario" and what is written in the rules/laws/instructions. That is the way I roll... -Protect your Status - file before your I-94 expires.

WARNING: Phrases in this post may sound meaner than they were intended to be. Read the Adjudicator's Field Manual from USCIS

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)

I wrote about half a page telling how we met online, how we met in person for the first time, and then wrote out the month and year of all the trips we have made since. I don't think all of that was needed, but including more information then necessary can never hurt. They don't want to read an entire book of unnecessary information, but I think its better not to leave out any important details (i.e that you first met online). Many people have been approved with much less, but its better to be safe then sorry.

On a completely random note, you and your fiance make a very cute couple! Looks like an attractive match to me ;)

Edited by Hugglebuggles
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Venezuela
Timeline
Posted
I wrote about half a page telling how we met online, how we met in person for the first time, and then wrote out the month and year of all the trips we have made since. I don't think all of that was needed, but including more information then necessary can never hurt. They don't want to read an entire book of unnecessary information, but I think its better not to leave out any important details (i.e that you first met online). Many people have been approved with much less, but its better to be safe then sorry.

On a completely random note, you and your fiance make a very cute couple! Looks like an attractive match to me ;)

awww:) thanks!!!

G(Venezuela)Venezuela%20flag-S-anim.gifanimated_earth.gifus-flag-small.gifJen(GA,U.S.)iATxm5.png369549mx7b73btk2.gif




Visajourney.png

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
it's not the I-129F that they use to determine if the relationship is bonified, anyway, right? They just want to make sure we've met within the last two years?
The two-year requirement satisfies USCIS. Bear in mind, however, that the consulate (which will receive everything that you send to USCIS, and where you will end up interviewing) will be reading everything concerning "bona fides" with intense interest. If you were interviewing in Ecuador, I would urge you to include a book on how you met, and your relationship. Go to the embassy/consulate reviews (top of any page) and read every review about Venezuela. Search (and ask in) the Latin American subforum, if you read something in the reviews that sounds disturbing. This notwithstanding, your "we first met in person..." is not untrue and can be written.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Venezuela
Timeline
Posted
Bear in mind, however, that the consulate (which will receive everything that you send to USCIS, and where you will end up interviewing) will be reading everything concerning "bona fides" with intense interest.

Okay, now I'm even more confused. Are you saying we should send everything we plan to have for the interview along with the I-129F to USCIS?!

I thought the mailing of the I-129F was just the first step where you have to prove you meet the requirement (i.e. 125% over poverty level, having met within the past 2 years, etc) and THEN the interview was to determine if the relationship is legit.

G(Venezuela)Venezuela%20flag-S-anim.gifanimated_earth.gifus-flag-small.gifJen(GA,U.S.)iATxm5.png369549mx7b73btk2.gif




Visajourney.png

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

What he's saying is that some consulates are known to be very difficult and will not allow you to submit any additional information proving your relationship at the interview. They will base the validity of your relationship based solely on what was originally submitted in the original petition. It may be a good idea to research the US consulate in Venezuela and find out if they are known to do this to people, if you haven't done so already.

A lot of people say to only include prof of having met in person for the last two years, as that meets the minimum requirements. But, like I said before, I think its a good idea to submit more information then is listed as necessary. This improves your chances of being approved quickly and with no RFE. Also, if the immigration officer refuses to listen to you, or accept additional prof of a bonafide relationship, it is already there, so he/she cannot deny you on the basis of not having enough evidence.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)
Okay, now I'm even more confused. Are you saying we should send everything we plan to have for the interview along with the I-129F to USCIS?!
Nope -- just some evidence (not a lot), bearing in mind the chief purpose, which you identify below:
I thought the mailing of the I-129F was just the first step where you have to prove you meet the requirement (i.e. 125% over poverty level, having met within the past 2 years, etc) and THEN the interview was to determine if the relationship is legit.
Technically, this is true. In reality, SOME consulates will kick interviewees out after a couple of minutes without allowing evidence to be presented. I am not saying that this applies to Venezuela -- chance are that it does not. Read the "reviews" to see if anything indicates that more than just a very little evidence of relationship ought to be included in the I-129F filing. If all (or overwhelmingly most) of the reviews indicate "no problem," then relax. :)

EDIT: Hugglebuggles responded just before, and that answer is excellent. Pay attention to that one and ignore mine here. :)

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...