Igors list?

[LaL 418]

You guys are obsessed with this list!

[Mr.Gabs 0]

Pretty nice work. Thanks for doing that...i just found out that i have 40 persons before me that is nothing!!!

[panterchen 1]

Thanks, captain! :-)

Also I just browsed through the profiles of some members that are still waiting for approval at VSC from February and I saw that there were a lot of inactive users (last visit Feb/March) and one for example that had in their signature their timeline of NOA 2 and packet 3 etc. but obvisously did not really update the VJ timeline and that's why they are still in the list. Is there a way to eliminate those people? I mean, I would guess that people that don't come back for such a long time are done with the process...

[Corinthians 7]

It's a cool list. I'd like it if the beneficiaries country showed up next to the User ID...maybe a country flag there or something...

[Shannon ♥ Nick 0]

well done Cap'n! looks good, I like the other ppls ideas of going by NOA1 date if that would be possible?

[Laura+Tom 2]

well done Cap'n! looks good, I like the other ppls ideas of going by NOA1 date if that would be possible?

It would be a good idea. I know the timelines are currently calculated using the sent date which can be misleading. I.e ours took three weeks to get to VSC since it was sent from overseas.

[geezer 1]

EXCELLANT

Thanks for all your work

[SteveColo 0]

Thank you for the list !!!

Though I still can't understand how some applications can go from a NOA1 to a NOA2 in 2 months or even less ... while others sit and sit

[Noi3125 1]

This is great thanks. I agree that it should be listed by NOA1 date rather than sent date.

[Captain Ewok 1,858]

would it be possible to sort the data by noa1 date instead of sent date? i feel that would create a more accurate estimate.

Done . You can sort by either the date sent or NOA1 (NOA1 is now the default).

[mox 298]

WOW! Great job, thank you for doing this!! And thanks for making NOA1 the default sort, since it's the "anchor point" of being in the system, I think it makes the most sense.

Couple things:

- A tiny nitpick: 'Igors List' should be 'Igor's List'.

- If I recall correctly, Igor filtered out timelines that had clearly either been abandoned or were so far out of the mainstream as to be statistically unhelpful. Are you doing anything like that?

- The very last stat is "Unapproved petitions." Does that mean denials? It shows zero items, is that correct?

[Captain Ewok 1,858]

I have PM'd over a hundred people (those unapproved from roughly July or later) and asked if they can update their timeline if they have new information to add . I hope this cleans up the list some.

[Captain Ewok 1,858]

- A tiny nitpick: 'Igors List' should be 'Igor's List'.

Updated.

- If I recall correctly, Igor filtered out timelines that had clearly either been abandoned or were so far out of the mainstream as to be statistically unhelpful. Are you doing anything like that?

Not filtering right now.

- The very last stat is "Unapproved petitions." Does that mean denials? It shows zero items, is that correct?

Not sure why it showed zero items. Unapproved should be all the petitions that do not have NOA2's. You may have loaded the page when I was updating something. Check now .

[mox 298]

- If I recall correctly, Igor filtered out timelines that had clearly either been abandoned or were so far out of the mainstream as to be statistically unhelpful. Are you doing anything like that?

Not filtering right now.

Not sure if you're planning to, but I think it would be helpful.

- The very last stat is "Unapproved petitions." Does that mean denials? It shows zero items, is that correct?

Not sure why it showed zero items. Unapproved should be all the petitions that do not have NOA2's. You may have loaded the page when I was updating something. Check now .

Yes, it's showing correctly now, thanks!

[Captain Ewok 1,858]

Any ideas on filtering criteria? I would love to but I am not sure how to properly filter out timelines that are old yet the people are still waiting.