Boiler

See what the online status says, probably just the wrong stamp.

If all is forgiven, which I do not believe, then F3 would be the way to go on the assumption the child is still a dependent. If the IR5 come through then yes the non F3 petitioned spouse could go first of there is such a desperation. Would it be worth it to test the waters, not my call. I suppose the child could be young and F2a is viable but with the other child being in their 20s at least that sounds unlikely? And even the F2a will take a long time. I know I am not so pessimistic but F2a will take quite a few years.

As far as I can tell the OP just wrote a statement listing all their past misdeeds. I have never heard of a Consulate giving absolution and I doubt it is legally possible or that it happened. More something for the Catholic Church. How is the other one going to immigrate to the US?

I am going to take that as meaning he moved out.

I do not see a route.

The only option you have is filing with a divorce waiver.

I seriously doubt you will need much, 30 years hard labour says it all.

Well that simplifies matters. Is your Father a USC or LPR?

Where do you live?

3 years? When can you naturalise?

Was this just for you or for both you and your spouse?

I had a look at past posts and nothing there to help clear up the matter. I was wondering how the Consulate found out, why you went to the Interview, did the Medical etc. I would not try Reinstatement without a Lawyer.

https://www.npr.org/2023/10/04/1203566052/pelosi-office-patrick-mchenry-speaker Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused the new interim speaker, Patrick McHenry, of ordering her to vacate her workspace in the U.S. Capitol building on Tuesday, just hours after the chamber's abrupt leadership shake-up. In a statement shared with NPR, Pelosi, D-Calif., said she was asked to leave her space "immediately." "With all of the important decisions that the new Republican Leadership must address, which we are all eagerly awaiting, one of the first actions taken by the new Speaker Pro Tempore was to order me to immediately vacate my office in the Capitol," she wrote, referring to McHenry, R-N.C., by his new formal title. The news item of the the day, the week, the month? Accused seems an odd choice of term, accused of what? But it is NPR.

I always think this sort of case is where a Lawyer has a big advantage, we just know some details and a lot is vague. A Lawyer would get a detailed timeline with supporting documents, for example the admission of guilt.

There is not a set time I have heard of, not sure I remember seeing such a case, more when you get to a point where a Court would consider the time taken unreasonable.

This is very strange: https://news.sky.com/story/transgender-world-cup-swimming-races-scrapped-because-no-one-entered-12976203 Transgender World Cup swimming races scrapped after no one enters The open category was set up to accommodate transgender swimmers after restrictions were imposed on them.

I assume it is required due to them being convinced she was married. Well that is the only thing you mention. You are only 2 months into the Waiver so far too early for a WoM.

What sort of appointment have you scheduled and with whom?

I do not think IR2 applies here, it would be IR5 or F2a.

Certainly read that they were both involved but if only one of them was that would be an option, for the F3 it would depend which one it was. Of course the IR5 for one of them in this theoretically case would be the only alternative. The non involved Spouse moves, files for the other child, we do not know the age, I am assuming that F2b will be more likely. The petition filed by the US born child can have the newly arrived Spouses hardships used but that is obviously going to be more challenging than a conventional situation. Just for the completeness. this is the stated issue: I see at least 2, maybe 3 grounds for a Waiver being required and they have of course got a signed statement admitting it. There was mention of a Lawyer being involved, not clear if that Lawyer has been told the full story.

I am not sure many Lawyers would recommend a LPR leave the US with a DV charge on their record.

Trigger warning lots of comments by TERFs. They do not seem to understand that Gender is super fluid.

What did his Lawyer say about traveling?

Wonder if the Father is alive and a USC

This could be a do not apply for Citizenship situation