Rosalind F

Or
 
13,082 drugs were not recalled and are being actively used 

Or
 
13,082 drugs were not recalled and are being actively used 

Or
 
13,082 drugs were not recalled and are being actively used 

Somehow this author forgot to mention that COVID-19 disease in pregnant people is associated with significantly higher risk of many conditions including maternal mortality, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. 
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2779182
 
 
Thalidomide story had changed the regulatory landscape in so many aspects including the clinical trials design and reporting laws. Clinical research is conducted with all these laws and regulations in mind. So yeah, I don't think anybody forgot thalidomide. 

Somehow this author forgot to mention that COVID-19 disease in pregnant people is associated with significantly higher risk of many conditions including maternal mortality, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. 
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2779182
 
 
Thalidomide story had changed the regulatory landscape in so many aspects including the clinical trials design and reporting laws. Clinical research is conducted with all these laws and regulations in mind. So yeah, I don't think anybody forgot thalidomide. 

Biometric waiver came today (9/13) dated 9/9 from LIN. So now we wait!

I recommend that you inform yourself before making an assumption of what i shared so I will take the time that you didn’t take by sharing facts:
 
In academic publishing, a preprint is a version of a scholarly or scientific paper that precedes formal peer review and publication in a peer-reviewed scholarly or scientific journal. The preprint may be available, often as a non-typeset version available free, before or after a paper is published in a journal.
 
When you question the science of vaccines you are asking to go back in time. Is that what you’re proposing?

Natural immunity is the result of having Covid (which my father died of).

What action has Israel taken with all their studies? Nowhere will you find that Israel pursued people getting  ‘natural’ immunity by getting sick
 
Israel provided their population a 3rd vaccination - to AVOID having patients overwhelming their hospitals.
 
And there’s one other salient point, and maybe the most helpful part of the study from Israel:

The preprint summary clearly states that 
individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant.
 
Fauci may not be able to fully explain what’s occurring with this novel virus but who can object  to a scientist trying to help protect people from this devastating virus?

Laugh all you want, you don't live here. This is our reality. A man like that does not deserve to run this state. Kevin Faulconer, sure. I don't agree with a lot of his politics, but he did a good job running San Diego. He's competent and has a track record of working hard. I'd give him the benefit of the doubt. Larry Elder is a showman and frankly an embarrassment. It is absurd that we could end up in a situation where he could get only a million votes out of tens of millions cast and still end up running the state. Recall elections as they are structured in this state are anti-democratic and I have never supported the concept. Other states have far higher thresholds for a recall; ours is WAY too low. 
 
For what it's worth, assuming that Newsom does win next month, I will probably be voting for one of his challengers in the primary. I'm sick of the state being run by politicians from NorCal when the bulk of the state is down here population wise. I'd like to see someone run from ANYWHERE south of San Luis Obispo, honestly.

Larry Elder should NOT be governor, for reasons wholly unrelated to his race. He is facing accusations from his former girlfriend that he brandished a gun in front of her when he was high as a kite. He also emotionally abused her throughout the relationship. He also has said MANY sexist things about women: that women are not intelligent enough to be in politics; that employers should be able to deny a woman a job because she's just planning on getting pregnant at some point; that unattractive women are safe from sexual assault; that women facing sexual harassment in the workplace should just overlook it. Kevin Faulconer, who's just about the only one of the candidates out there I could even remotely deal with on the ballot, has slammed Elder. I do not want a man who clearly sees women as lesser beings running my state, and I especially do not want one accused of getting high and brandishing a gun in front of his girlfriend. 
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/19/elders-ex-fiancee-said-he-brandished-a-gun-at-her-506286

Very good news for those of us concerned about access to a very safe procedure that American women have a constitutionally protected right to enforce.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/department-of-justice-texas-suing-abortion-ban
 
This is a private medical decision for a woman. Women should be empowered to make the decision that is right for them. I'm glad that there are stories where people chose not to terminate in difficult circumstances and it turned out well. That's what pro-choice is all about -- that women can choose what is right for themselves and their families. 

Indeed too fast. It's an article from 2020.

Indeed too fast. It's an article from 2020.

Indeed too fast. It's an article from 2020.

My understanding is that something like 96% of physicians are now fully vaccinated. I can look for the link. 
 
Edit -- here it is: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-survey-shows-over-96-doctors-fully-vaccinated-against-covid-19
 
So over 96% last month and that number is growing. 

Here's an idea: why can't people just vote for whomever they want to vote for? This is the same Rabbi that way back when but not so long ago felt it was inappropriate for a Rabbi or a pastor, let alone a shul - have a position on politics, let alone show favoritism to any candidate or party. He preferred Rabbis to be apolitical, thereby attendees of any political party could focus their time on spiritual matters - the things that have the most meaning. Be more concerned with the holy than with politicians and parties. Religious men that are only concerned about political souls rather than actual souls, are spiritually dead. It is rather ridiculous, if not a little insulting to assert that a persons Jewishness should be affiliated with a certain movement of any party, than it would be to say the same of any person of any faith or creed. We are individuals, afterall.

Here is HR 3684: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr3684/BILLS-117hr3684pcs.pdf This is the bill that has passed the House and Senate, the "little" bill.
 
There is precisely 1 reference to the CDC in the entirety of HR 3684, on page 936, which is amending a portion of this law: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/49/5329 And if you read them together, it's about the existing national public transportation safety plan, and requiring the plan to include "strategies to minimize the exposure of the public, personnel, and property to hazards and unsafe conditions" -- but changing the part I quoted to say: "public and personnel to injuries, assaults, fatalities, and, consistent with guidelines by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, infectious diseases, and strategies to minimize the exposure of property’’
 
I also looked for "arrest" and there are 3 references to arrests, all on page 1065. All three involve assessments of arrests resulting from drunk driving. 
 
I also looked for "fine." There are 2 references to fines on pages 1041, 1042, two of them. Both have to do with state laws prohibiting texting or otherwise using a phone while driving (other than by handsfree methods).
 
Or maybe we're talking about the "big" bill that hasn't yet passed. HR 227? Text is here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/227/text
 
Nope, nothing there either. 

We the People need to lobby Congress to change immigration policy.
The virus was concocted from Sars cells supplied by  Ft Detrick. Taken to L3 Biolab in U of N Carolina and worked with to produce 'gain of function' . Chinese from Wuhan came to the lab and paid to participate. 4 more viruses including the HIV virus were injected into the new chimera virus. The injector sites are clearly seen in the coronavirus when examined. Covid is a chimera of viruses. The original Sars of 20 years ago was also created by the USA. We made Sars. Patent applications go back 20 years. Fauci and the CDC tried several times to patent these virus and eventually were successful. The name 'covid 19' had already been used on paperwork a year or two before the covid 19 outbreak and it was in 2020 supposedly renamed from 'coronavirus' to 'covid 19'. It already had that name despite what the MSM told you.
 
They had also been working on vaccines for this for 20 years too. Israel admitted that they already 'coincidentally' had one ready. The mRNA tech was being played with for almost as long but they could never use it in humans because they didn't know how to stop it from killing the animals in the tests. Basically, they skipped further animal testing and started to test it on humans in 2020. One or two human test volunteers died but they said it was coincidence and a couple others became paralyzed but the news of that was is no longer talked about. Employees of the drug companies have said that the people who take these vaccines are the Test Subjects now.  But the researchers and developers back in 2012 at the U of Texas in their papers, never said these were 'vaccinines'. They rightly referred to them as "gene therapy". Even the man who is responsible for mRNA technology, Dr Robert Malone, is against these injections. Especially in people under 30 or so.
 
None of the these vaccines are actually tested though. Not even the yearly flu vaccines. The reason for that is that they DON'T really use a Control Group. The control is not given a simple saline solution. It is given the identical vaccine with all the adjuvants but without the virus particles. So, any damage done by the adjuvants and solutions is never taken into account. And that is by design. The covid vaxx is not even tested on pregnant women yet governments are using coersion to force vaxx the world. Oh...what could go wrong.
 
You can fast forward through the German translation parts:
Brighteon
 

CDC: "Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem."
 
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html
 

and does not mean 99% are resistant  to it by any means. 

You call it "things mixed up". I call it misinformation. 
 
No, the withdrawal is not due to the test inaccuracy. As we are heading into new flu season, it is highly beneficial to detect both flu and COVID-19 viruses. CDC has developed a multiplex assay just for that: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/testing.html. 
 
No, the CDC PCR test was intended for COVID-19. It uses primers that are specific for COVID-19 disease (caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus) nucleic acid.
 
Yes, CDC never submitted 510k for this PCR test. But CDC was granted emergency use authorization by the FDA for this test: https://www.fda.gov/media/134919/download.  As of today, there are 279 molecular tests that are authorized by the FDA under emergency use authorizations. Are you saying they are all inaccurate? 

You call it "things mixed up". I call it misinformation. 
 
No, the withdrawal is not due to the test inaccuracy. As we are heading into new flu season, it is highly beneficial to detect both flu and COVID-19 viruses. CDC has developed a multiplex assay just for that: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/testing.html. 
 
No, the CDC PCR test was intended for COVID-19. It uses primers that are specific for COVID-19 disease (caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus) nucleic acid.
 
Yes, CDC never submitted 510k for this PCR test. But CDC was granted emergency use authorization by the FDA for this test: https://www.fda.gov/media/134919/download.  As of today, there are 279 molecular tests that are authorized by the FDA under emergency use authorizations. Are you saying they are all inaccurate? 

You call it "things mixed up". I call it misinformation. 
 
No, the withdrawal is not due to the test inaccuracy. As we are heading into new flu season, it is highly beneficial to detect both flu and COVID-19 viruses. CDC has developed a multiplex assay just for that: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/testing.html. 
 
No, the CDC PCR test was intended for COVID-19. It uses primers that are specific for COVID-19 disease (caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus) nucleic acid.
 
Yes, CDC never submitted 510k for this PCR test. But CDC was granted emergency use authorization by the FDA for this test: https://www.fda.gov/media/134919/download.  As of today, there are 279 molecular tests that are authorized by the FDA under emergency use authorizations. Are you saying they are all inaccurate? 

First screenshot: No, FDA did not recall CDC PCR test. FDA posts all medical devices recalls. Please share a link to such FDA page if you can find it. I could not find such page. Appears simply not true. 
Second screenshot: This post from CDC site should be read as "CDC suggests using tests that can detect both flu and COVID-19 instead of the initial test that detected COVID-19 only". Please note that CDC voluntarily withdraws the test, it is not recalled.
Third screenshot: This Innova test is something completely different and not related to the CDC RT-PCR test. Heck, it's antigen test and not a PCR test. Here's the link to the recall notice from FDA page https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-recalls/innova-medical-group-recalls-unauthorized-sars-cov-2-antigen-rapid-qualitative-test-risk-false-test
At the same time Britain apparently extended EUA for this particular test but I would rather trust FDA. 

First screenshot: No, FDA did not recall CDC PCR test. FDA posts all medical devices recalls. Please share a link to such FDA page if you can find it. I could not find such page. Appears simply not true. 
Second screenshot: This post from CDC site should be read as "CDC suggests using tests that can detect both flu and COVID-19 instead of the initial test that detected COVID-19 only". Please note that CDC voluntarily withdraws the test, it is not recalled.
Third screenshot: This Innova test is something completely different and not related to the CDC RT-PCR test. Heck, it's antigen test and not a PCR test. Here's the link to the recall notice from FDA page https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-recalls/innova-medical-group-recalls-unauthorized-sars-cov-2-antigen-rapid-qualitative-test-risk-false-test
At the same time Britain apparently extended EUA for this particular test but I would rather trust FDA.