Jump to content

PWB

Members
  • Posts

    343
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PWB

  1. 2 hours ago, K1visaHopeful said:

    Please do not follow this post.

    It is full of confusing information that the OP has not made clear after we have asked so that others (like you) would not be confused. 

     

    2 hours ago, K1visaHopeful said:

    Please do not follow this post.

    It is full of confusing information that the OP has not made clear after we have asked so that others (like you) would not be confused. 

     

    2 hours ago, K1visaHopeful said:

    Please do not follow this post.

    It is full of confusing information that the OP has not made clear after we have asked so that others (like you) would not be confused. 

     

    2 hours ago, K1visaHopeful said:

    Please do not follow this post.

    It is full of confusing information that the OP has not made clear after we have asked so that others (like you) would not be confused. 

    Time for you to stop.  I haver made it clear.  No one but you have spent so much time being so critical.  What I posted is factual and not intended to hurt anyone.  Stop now please.

  2. 10 hours ago, hunny&me said:

    I see... Yes, Philippines is Biggie on Original or Certified documents (waiting for the time they join the digital era :)).  Maybe the death was reported to Germany? Maybe they have a centralized records (like PSA for Philippines) that your wife can request (ie - certified copy with raised stamp)?  Sorry, I feel your stress.  

    Germany could not help because he did not die there.  

  3. 23 minutes ago, hunny&me said:

    Maybe Report of Death? Hard though for which Consulate will that fall into or maybe report in Philippines.  Sorry, sounds complicated.

    The frustrating thing is his Death Certificate was approved for every aspects of our K1 visa and was never challenged any where except Houston.  Given the fact that Houston Consulate had a difficult time explaining what was needed.   They wanted a raised stamp.  We called then Ethiopian Hospital and was told the copy we had was the copy available.  Just as a side point there are no Ethiopian Consulate's open due to a war in their country and the Embassy was not helpful.   

  4. No, and that is the problem.  The worst of circumstances, he was German and had returned home to Germany for heart treatment.  He attempted to travel back to the Philippines before he had fully recovered and died in flight.  The plane landed in Ethiopia and the hospital declared him deceased and issued a death certificate, that death certificate was good enough to get a CEN0MAR and a K1 visa, get married and all that, but it isn't good enough for the Houston Consulate who have refused to process our ROM. We have complained all the way to the Philippines Embassy in Washington and no help.  Our case is under review by PSA. 

  5. 22 hours ago, Jordan & Jenet said:


    Hello All,

    I need some assistance, We filed ROM months ago and it is still not processed, is there any way that my wife can get her CFO so that she can leave to the US without the certified processed copy of the report of marriage? This is getting crazy, We have waited so long and now this is stopping everything. 

    We are both depressed as hell and don't know what to do at this point.


    Thanks,
    Jordan

    It has been over one year since we filed in Houston and we are still waiting.  For some unexplained  reason Houston would not accept the Death Certificate of previous husband and paperwork was sent to Manila for approval.  ROM has become a nightmare of paperwork and waiting on Manila to reply.

  6. 18 hours ago, Dashinka said:

    So she was out of the US for a month in the 3 year period?  If that is correct, it is not an issue.  The early filing date is the 3 year anniversary of the "residence since date" on the GC less 90 days.  If filing online, it is suggested not to file immediately, but wait a day or two as the USCIS IT system is finicky sometimes.

     

    Good Luck! 

    Does the same rule apply for those traveling on a conditional green card during the AOS period?

  7. 3 hours ago, Joyoussinger said:

    I think @K1visaHopeful is trying to do the opposite and create hope among the readers and help anyone reading this thread to navigate similar issues without the confusion an RFE can cause. Posting the RFE, with personal information redacted of course, would help. You're certainly not compelled to do so, but please understand the reason for having been asked.

    I posted so much information about the RFE I thought it was understandable and that is based on the responses I received from others. For someone to argue that it was not an RFE and on top of that say that  I made a mistake in understanding the processing requirement is not accurate.  Once again I will go over the RFE.  It  initially stated that a vaccination was missing and  then in the fourth paragraph I am told that I must submit a new I-693.  I called USCIS and read them the RFE and their response was to only get the missing vaccination.  The only provision for submitting the missing vaccination was to submit a new I693  signed and sealed by a CS.   The CS would not submit the I-693 with only the missing vaccination.  The results were the completion of a battery of vaccinations and a chest x-ray was done in order to submit the I-693.  If someone is confused about the RFE then join the club because so was I.   Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but does not work for someone having to comply with USCIS suspense dates.    

  8. 2 hours ago, K1visaHopeful said:

    Look I get it...you want to vent.

    But I'm telling you, the majority of the time it's because we messed up or didn't understand the process.

    Your full disclosure with conclusion/ remedy from us could help others.

    I understand if you don't want to do that however this thread is quite useless to others then as your situation has not been made clear and explained away with assumptions. 

    We can help or we can post a warning to take your story with a grain of salt as to that's not what really happened (and by really happened meaning you have not been able to explain it well with evidence) so others please don't stress about what happened to this member. 

    I have fully, and correctly,  explained the RFE, for privacy reasons I will not post the RFE.  Have no axe to drive in this matter.  If you have read all my posting on this matter you will see that I fully explained the RFE.   As far as remedy I think we need to be aware of the importance of medical records.   You are starting to sound like I am lying and trying to create despair amongst the readers.  That is not my intention and if you knew of the problems caused by trying to comply with the RFE you would understand .  Yield to the expert. 

  9. She had the worksheet and it was difficult to interpret, appeared to be complete.   That was part of the cause for confusion.  Once USCIS sent RFE they made no attempt to clarify just what was needed.  The CS had no choice except to repeat immunizations and chest x-ray.  If you were allowed to talk to the regional officer who created the problem this could have been resolved.  

  10. 5 hours ago, FianceeInBrazil said:

    A new or updated  I-693 ids required if something was missing from the first

     

    It might be related to the COVID vaccine.  If it was not required the you did your originally do your  I-693, that could be the issue.  Or maybe they need proof of the second dose.

     

    Also sometimes the original  I-693 has the things missing.  Basically at AOS it is looked at again.  but it is looked at with current requirements and not the original requirements you needed for the K=1

    N

     

    5 hours ago, FianceeInBrazil said:

    A new or updated  I-693 ids required if something was missing from the first

     

    It might be related to the COVID vaccine.  If it was not required the you did your originally do your  I-693, that could be the issue.  Or maybe they need proof of the second dose.

     

    Also sometimes the original  I-693 has the things missing.  Basically at AOS it is looked at again.  but it is looked at with current requirements and not the original requirements you needed for the K=1

    N

  11. Back in the day (2017) when our journey started  K-1 was the promoted visa.  Little did I know that we would so deeply regret that choice.  15 months to approve AOS and at the cost of over $2500,00 for fees and repeat of fees.  That does not take into consideration all the frustration and unnecessary B.S. that USCIS causes by not being able to answer correctly the most fundamental questions.  CR1 may have problems unique to its self but still the best way to go.

×
×
  • Create New...