Dashinka

This may be the issue. Is the RFE requesting copies of tax returns? As @K1visaHopeful stated, W2's are not necessary when submitting IRS tax transcripts. There have been examples of people receiving RFEs when they combine transcripts and W2's which does not make sense, but apparently USCIS can be easily confused. If what I laid out is accurate, I would respond to the RFE by providing what they ask for rather than potentially creating more confusion by moving to an I864EZ. Good Luck!

It is quite massive when it comes to the products of combustion.

СВАТКАР Cyrillic spelling

VW?

Interesting ploy. Trump says he's raising China tariffs further, pausing reciprocal tariffs for others https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/trump-says-hes-raising-china-tariffs-further-pausing-reciprocal-tariffs-others

You can at least take that as a good sign that there were no issues that came up at the interview. But as @OldUser stated, verbal approval at the interview does not in fact mean final approval. Prepare for a wait, and pray it is not too long. Good Luck!

Don't know for certain. Generally they are requesting background information from the countries he has lived, and since Pakistan is on the list, and the government there is less than cooperative, it may take some time until the consulate is ready. I requested a moderator move this thread to the appropriate regional forum as there may be better responses to your questions. Good Luck! https://www.visajourney.com/forums/forum/91-asia-south/

OK, be prepared for a lengthy AP.

Another example of cluelessness. Just another example of today's journalist actually acting like activists. I did find it interesting she never mentioned the billionaires that support leftist causes and pay for many of these "protesters". Saturday’s Trump protests weren’t perfect. But they brought a glimmer of hope In San Francisco, I saw an older white couple wearing T-shirts that read Resist or Nasty Woman – clearly leftovers from the first Trump era, dug out from the back of the closet – chatting amiably with a pair of young Black women wearing keffiyehs as hijabs. Palestinian, American and trans flags were in bountiful supply – along with the newly familiar flag of Greenland, the icebound and mineral-rich northern territory that Trump has concocted a bizarre plan to take over. Handmade signs held aloft amid the massive crowd spoke to a dizzying array of grievances against the Trump administration: from “Medicaid saves lives” to “Childhood vaccines cause adulthood” to “Hands off my social security”. A child let me take a photograph of a sign he’d made himself, in his inexpert handwriting, that read, “If you think education is expensive, try ignorance”, and was complete with three drawings of open books. Some signs pointed to federal programs the maker had benefited from – the Veterans Administration, Pell grants, the National Institutes of Health, national parks, Medicare – while speakers cited the local costs of Trump’s cuts and agenda, from pollution in the San Francisco Bay, to layoffs at local employers, to the plight of immigrant communities. But overwhelmingly, the sentiment was pro-democracy and anti-oligarchical. One sign showed the Statue of Liberty covering her face and weeping: “No Fascists”, it said. Another showed Lady Liberty’s torch setting alight a Tesla Cybertruck. Elon Musk, Trump and Mark Zuckerberg appeared on one sign with the words “Down with the Broligarchy” – a popular catchphrase. Another sign read “End Citizens United” – a reference to the 2010 supreme court decision that allowed unlimited money into politics – a warping of the law that made the takeover of the federal government by monied interests inevitable. When a representative of a local nurses’ union spoke through a bullhorn, her most popular line summed up the tenor of the afternoon: “We can have billionaires, or we can have democracy,” she said. “We can’t have both.” https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/08/trump-protests-hands-off

AP is fairly common, but you mentioned they returned his passport which does not seem to indicate it will be quick. Is your spouse from the UAE, or are they from another country? AP, can take some time if the consulate has requested background checks. There is not a whole lot you can do at this point other than wait and be patient. Good Luck!

I would definitely bring both to the interview. Good Luck!

OK, just a little confused here as you said you divorced wife 1 relatively soon after getting the GC, but then you mentioned ROC. Did you mean to say you divorced wife 1 soon after getting your 10yr GC? As to the traffic incident, I don't see a lot of issues.

Pandora’s Box?

Depends on what the OP did with respect to the GC.

Good point, wonder the status of the wife.

Probably cannot AOS. There is a risk of crossing the border illegally, and then trying to hide under the radar. Does this guy have an actual and valid SSN? Why didn't they pursue a spousal visa via consulate processing when they married? These are some of the questions I wish these 'journalists' from the synchronized media would ask.

Still trying to find out more about this guy. According to some, there was an order of removal attached to him from 2019 with the only caveat being he could not be removed to El Salvador, so sort of in a stasis. So was he in fact legal here, or just sort of safe at least from removal to El Salvador. I understand his asylum claims were rejected which I understand he filed after the 2019 removal order. Then he got married to a USC (being married to a USC does not confer legal status). So why are all the MSM types saying he was here in the country legally? He apparently has no pathway to LPR while inside the US having entered without inspection. Maybe his wife should start the I130 process now that he is outside the US.

Absolutely, no one actually has the original, only certified copies, or if they do, the clerk messed up.

Yes, you definitely need one from each of you. The one and only RFE my now wife and I received was for a missing intent to marry letter from her. She sent me a scanned copy so I could respond to the RFE, and we were all good. I agree with @MalloryCat, no need for detailed plans of the future wedding, just the desire of each of you to marry. Good Luck!

You will be just fine with the certified copies provided by your local clerk. Actually, any one of those provides evidence of a valid marriage properly documented by your local clerk. Even if you rushed back to your local clerk, they will only provide another certified copy like the one’s you have. Good Luck with your interview.

You may try DM’ing this poster who recently also went through the SB1 process. It was a different consulate, so the timing may be different, but they may have some knowledge of what step 2 is. Good Luck!

It was actually a fortuitous post as it was the very next new posting after your post, and the poster was successful. Good Luck!

An I290B seems to be appropriate here as the assets were presented. You may considering organizing your asset information in a similar way as to the linked thread as even though this was done for the consulate, the situation is similar. Good Luck!

I agree, land borders can lead to delays, hence longer detention.

Definitely. What is also interesting was she only made a passing reference to Canada Border Services turning her around due to an improper visa. This is fairly common, especially at land crossings where people are turned around for suspecting to work on a visitor visa (visa free for USCs). This happened once to my nephew, a technician of assembly equipment. Of course US and Canadian border officers talk to each other, and now the jig was up as CBP was now informed that she had entered the U.S. using the wrong visa, and now had to leave. The jist of the piece though seemed to be all about her not being treated like a queen, so she ends it with a warning not to travel to the U.S. The warning should have been do not travel to another country with the improper visa.