-
Posts
34,827 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
73
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Everything posted by Dashinka
-
Actually, consulate officers are required by law to assume anyone applying for a B2 visa will end up overstaying. It is the burden of the applicant to prove otherwise primarily through the information they put on the DS160. This is why we see things like people claiming to be married on the DS160 when they are not as they think it increases the chances they will be approved. That being said, there is not much you can do to help her overcome that burden of proof. Btw, I thought the same thing back when my now wife was denied twice for B2’s. We decided at that time our relationship was good enough to proceed with a K1 (probably would look to do a spousal visa if doing it now). Good Luck!
-
That is also the only one I am aware of and that was 5-6 years ago. So advise her not to be flippant when answering any questions. Good Luck!
-
All I can say is that unless there is some sort of criminal history, she should have no issues entering with a valid visa. Assuming that is not the case, all she has to do is answer the questions from the CBP officer truthfully, she is not required to offer any unsolicited information. Additionally, I would stay away from TikTok, I saw a video the other day from there saying people could save gasoline if they filled their tanks slowly. Good Luck!
-
Was approved at interview in Montreal
Dashinka replied to Pat J's topic in General Immigration-Related Discussion
hmm. Kind of goes against what is actually printed on the visa “Upon endorsement …”. Was the CBP officer able to see if the system shows you as an LPR now? -
Was approved at interview in Montreal
Dashinka replied to Pat J's topic in General Immigration-Related Discussion
Probably because I absentmindedly forgot to include it. https://www.cbp.gov/about/contact/ports/deferred-inspection-sites -
Was approved at interview in Montreal
Dashinka replied to Pat J's topic in General Immigration-Related Discussion
Definitely worth a try and I would do this before attempting a re-issue with MTL. To the OP, here is a website showing CBP deferred inspection sites. I would see if there is anything they can do wrt your first entry after the visa was issued. Good Luck! -
Recommended Apps for Citizenship Exams
Dashinka replied to PGA's topic in US Citizenship General Discussion
Then maybe we will get a Peruvian version of the thread TBone posted -
Question on USCIS account
Dashinka replied to MarmiteC's topic in Removing Conditions on Residency General Discussion
I am not sure about how best to make sure you get the notices in a timely fashion. That being said, I wanted to add a suggestion that you wait for the following week to send the package in. You do not want to experience a sudden bout of government efficiency where the package shows up too early, and yes, I know the 4th is a national holiday, but it is still safer to wait a few days after the filing window opens. Good Luck! -
Unsolicited Evidence I-130
Dashinka replied to Roussel Boudreaux's topic in IR-1 / CR-1 Spouse Visa Process & Procedures
Sure seems like that is the case. -
Good deal. Like I mentioned, I would make it a five year plan, and plan for eventual naturalization so in the end, it will leave you with no issues regarding where you want to live (at least from an immigration standpoint, still need to deal with US taxes, but I assume you are already familiar with that). Also, with her getting a GC, it makes travel during those five years very easy, and though you mentioned she has no plans to work, having the GC allows that option if she changes her mind. Here is a good thread outlining the process for DCF based on a job offer. This was done in Japan, but the process should be similar in Bangkok. Good Luck!
-
My wife filed by paper, but that was back in 2018 when online filing was just getting started. No real difference other than the need to print out a lot of evidence to submit with the filing if you decide to include all of that with the initial filing (we did not, and only took the other evidence with us to her interview). In the end, paper filings are scanned and uploaded, so it does add a little more processing time for a paper filing, but either are acceptable. Of course there are some exceptions that require paper filing. I don't remember all of those exceptions other than if someone is requesting a fee waiver, but I think there are one or two others.
-
Do you have a solid job offer requiring you to move back to the US soon? DCF at US consulates is only accepted under exceptional circumstances (immediate need for the USC to repatriate being one of the common reasons). That being said, you actually have to be married first which I understand is going to happen soon, then you need a solid job offer requiring your need to repatriate, then you contact the consulate requesting they accept the I130 filing. This is the fastest way, and she will enter with a GC if the consulate accepts your filing. If that works for you, it is your best option, then I would plan to stay for 4-5 years allowing her to naturalize, and once that is complete you can come as go as you please. Good Luck!
-
Oops, poor math, more like $36k saved.
-
Right, so you saved approximately $20k (26 weeks times $800 minus the one time $600) in daycare while she was here. Sounds like she was definitely working and abusing the terms of her B2 visa, and more than likely when she made the comment "watching her nephews" at the interview, that was the point the CO made the decision. Good Luck, but I agree with the others, she is not likely to get a B2 anytime soon, if ever again.
-
Questions about the N400 Online Application
Dashinka replied to ilikepotatoes's topic in US Citizenship General Discussion
We also took the bare minimum route wrt to N400 evidence when my wife filed (3yr rule). No RFEs, took a lot of info to the interview, and none of it looked at. -
Form I-864 (post RFE) questions
Dashinka replied to adzgem's topic in Bringing Family Members of US Citizens to America
Don't know for certain, but if from the tax transcript you should be fine. Not required for submission, but should have them if asked for. Not required unless something changed on the petitioner's I864. IRS transcripts (yes, you subsequent post shows the correct document) already contains the W2 information. Including proof of ongoing income is fine. Good Luck! -
Definitely sounds like a new person advising someone to go ahead and purchase international tickets. To the OP, yes, it is a waiting game, and possibly when your case was reviewed by a supervisor there was something that was found. Possibly a supervisor was on vacation. Hopefully the GC will show up soon, but worst case is you are called back for another interview. Good Luck!
