Jump to content

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, Dashinka said:

I certainly can agree with that.  Let’s say Extreme Leftist/Progressives.  Can you imagine what the media coverage would be if it was extreme Right folks setting up autonomous zones, or attacking police.

Puts those 2016 "predictions" of right wing extremism following a democratically anointed heir-apparent Hillary victory in perspective. Was more like a self-indictment of people projecting their own extremism upon others. It's a pretty effective method of destabilization and attempting to forcefully shift the Overton window to get power to themselves in rapid fashion. It took several years for a very harsh reaction to left wing extremism in the 60s, dare I say these growing extremist left are ill prepared for the blowback if they continue.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Puts those 2016 "predictions" of right wing extremism following a democratically anointed heir-apparent Hillary victory in perspective. Was more like a self-indictment of people projecting their own extremism upon others. It's a pretty effective method of destabilization and attempting to forcefully shift the Overton window to get power to themselves in rapid fashion. It took several years for a very harsh reaction to left wing extremism in the 60s, dare I say these growing extremist left are ill prepared for the blowback if they continue.

I pray you are right. I dont think left wing nonsense was this bad back then. 

The main difference may be that big city leaders did not support such idotic behavior 

Posted
1 minute ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I pray you are right. I dont think left wing nonsense was this bad back then. 

The main difference may be that big city leaders did not support such idotic behavior 

Very true, they did not have the institutional support they do now. Part of me wants to play this down, but the threat is definitely a lot more systemic, and just surfaced out of nowhere.

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  For bad satire, your first guess should be Babylon Bee.

 

   https://babylonbee.com/news/progressive-parents-disappointed-in-how-white-their-children-are

Question, do you think the Onion would run this today?

 

A key metric of how comedy works is when the comedians have to censor themselves, even if offensive, and a fair warning, it's offensive. But that's what the Onion always was, until cancel culture.

 

Cancel culture was always the antithesis of comedy especially for liberals. If one had any introspective reasoning, they'd ask themselves why the 180. 

Edited by Burnt Reynolds
Posted
49 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Question, do you think the Onion would run this today?

 

A key metric of how comedy works is when the comedians have to censor themselves, even if offensive, and a fair warning, it's offensive. But that's what the Onion always was, until cancel culture.

 

Cancel culture was always the antithesis of comedy especially for liberals. If one had any introspective reasoning, they'd ask themselves why the 180. 

The 5 did a segment today. Several polls report the same thing. Conservatives by a large margin are scared to voice an opnion.  Even Juan Williams agreed the cancel culture is out of control. 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

The 5 did a segment today. Several polls report the same thing. Conservatives by a large margin are scared to voice an opnion.  Even Juan Williams agreed the cancel culture is out of control. 

Juan was once a victim of cancer culture not that long ago, funny enough, found a home on FOX. The left's engagement to cancer culture is entirely illiberal, so when they want to sidestep humor and declare how a conservative satire site isn't satire, while finding the Onion funny, without irony, remind them of this type of Onion humor, I could list tons like that. The left have no concept of what humor is circa 2020, they cancelled it.. at least, for themselves. It's why their comedians do "news" now, rather than comedy. It's most disappointing to those with a liberal sense of humor like us, who enjoyed offensive things, and have to resort to largely replaying older things, as new "humor" isn't allowed under the left's cancer culture rules that not-so-smart people decided to cater to rather than, say, mock.

Edited by Burnt Reynolds
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
5 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

For bad satire, your first guess should be Babylon Bee.

   https://babylonbee.com/news/progressive-parents-disappointed-in-how-white-their-children-are

It WAS my first guess, but I couldn't remember the name, so I used the guess that I could remember.

"A mind is a terrible thing to lose."  -- Dan Quayle

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

Looks like the blowback is real

 

Chicago anti-police protesters target mayor's home after her call with Trump

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chicago-anti-police-protesters-target-mayors-home-after-her-call-with-trump

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
6 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Looks like the blowback is real

 

Chicago anti-police protesters target mayor's home after her call with Trump

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chicago-anti-police-protesters-target-mayors-home-after-her-call-with-trump

Gotta love mob rule and the Democrats that have enabled these actions.  Maybe these leaders should look at what happened to most of the folks involved in the Russian Revolution.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
17 hours ago, Dashinka said:

look at what happened to most of the folks involved

I like what befell Robespierre, personally.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...