Gore claims climate battle just like fight against slavery, apartheid

[ready4ONE 5,400]

1 hour ago, jg121783 said:

There is a scientific source in the article with an external link if you had bothered to look.

Then why not directly post the article in the external link and quote from it?

[IAMX 3,055]

Just now, ready4ONE said:

Then why not directly post the article in the external link and quote from it?

To watch you complain about it. 

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, ready4ONE said:

Then why not directly post the article in the external link and quote from it?

oh! here ya go 

[ready4ONE 5,400]

2 hours ago, jg121783 said:

There is a scientific source in the article with an external link if you had bothered to look.

The source article exists, notrickszone.com omits mention of the documents conclusion. I don't wonder why.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

11 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

oh! here ya go 

Guessing you didn't read the conclusion of the source article. Glad you can Google.

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, ready4ONE said:

Guessing you didn't read the conclusion of the source article. Glad you can Google.

that's the beauty of it. i didn't even have to google, i followed the  hyperlink "a new scholarly paper" this is the the .jpg i got. now informed!

 

[IAMX 3,055]

NYT: Climate Alarmism Is Good Because Scaremongering Fixed Y2K Bug

 

Terrifying people about the possibility climate change could eventually destroy Earth is justifiable because alarming citizens about the Y2K bug worked, The New York Times reported Wednesday.

Academics and activists have a license to generate some fear among people about what could happen if global warming is not properly addressed, according to NYT writer Farhad Manjoo. He claimed that a little fear can go along way if it rallies people toward a common cause.

Manjoo used the terror created during the Y2K scare as an example of what can be accomplished through fear.

“Sometimes, sometimes the worst case is the only that prompts us to get anything done,” wrote Manjoo, who covers technology for the paper. He reported on a computer bug in the late-1990s that some predicted would cause government computers to crash and be unable to process information at midnight Jan. 1, 2000.

“I know this because I’ve studied the last time governments, businesses and ordinary citizens joined together to combat a complex, man-made problem that threatened to wreak global havoc in the distant future,” he wrote, referring to the massive effort some tech-types used to eliminate the bug.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/19/nyt-climate-alarmism-is-good-because-scaremongering-fixed-y2k-bug/

 

Boy this really does remind me a lot about religion..

 

Hedge your bets! Your apparently omniscient mind-and-soul-reading deity won't even be suspecting of your motivations!

Edited July 19, 2017 by IAMX

[Dashinka 26,210]

27 minutes ago, ready4ONE said:

The source article exists, notrickszone.com omits mention of the documents conclusion. I don't wonder why.

Seems to match the reported summary.

 

Conclusion 

 

Our results permit to conclude that CO2 is a very weak greenhouse gas and cannot be accepted as the main driver of climate change. The observed temperature increase since pre-industrial times is close to an order of magnitude higher than that attributable to 

CO2. We find that the increase of CO2 only might become dangerous, if the concentrations are considerably greater than 4000 ppm. At present rates of increase this would take more than 200 years. Therefore, demands for sequestering CO2 are unjustified and trading of CO2 certificates is an economic absurdity. The climate change must have a very different origin and the scientific community must look for causes of climate change that can be solidly based on physics and chemistry.

This paper, similar to a previous version 14, must not, however, become a pretext for unlimited burning of fossil fuels. Incomplete oxidization together with heavy metal, aerosol and radioactivity emissions coupled with dangerous chemical reaction products are harmful to the health and the environment. 

 

http://www.entrelemanetjura.ch/BLOG_WP_351/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2017.01-20-FKR-sur-CO2.pdf

 

 

 

 

[Dashinka 26,210]

14 minutes ago, IAMX said:

 

 

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/19/nyt-climate-alarmism-is-good-because-scaremongering-fixed-y2k-bug/

 

Boy this really does remind me a lot about religion..

 

Hedge your bets! Your apparently omniscient mind-and-soul-reading deity won't even be suspecting of your motivations!

 

[IAMX 3,055]

2 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

 

When a religion comes full circle after pretending to associate itself with science.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

18 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Seems to match the reported summary.

 

Conclusion 

 

Our results permit to conclude that CO2 is a very weak greenhouse gas and cannot be accepted as the main driver of climate change. The observed temperature increase since pre-industrial times is close to an order of magnitude higher than that attributable to 

CO2. We find that the increase of CO2 only might become dangerous, if the concentrations are considerably greater than 4000 ppm. At present rates of increase this would take more than 200 years. Therefore, demands for sequestering CO2 are unjustified and trading of CO2 certificates is an economic absurdity. The climate change must have a very different origin and the scientific community must look for causes of climate change that can be solidly based on physics and chemistry.

This paper, similar to a previous version 14, must not, however, become a pretext for unlimited burning of fossil fuels. Incomplete oxidization together with heavy metal, aerosol and radioactivity emissions coupled with dangerous chemical reaction products are harmful to the health and the environment. 

 

http://www.entrelemanetjura.ch/BLOG_WP_351/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2017.01-20-FKR-sur-CO2.pdf

 

 

 

 

like I said...lets open the mines again and let the clean beautiful coal flow 

[Dashinka 26,210]

3 minutes ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

like I said...lets open the mines again and let the clean beautiful coal flow 

If it makes economic sense, sure.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

8 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

If it makes economic sense, sure.

 

Coal fly ash from India alarms environmentalists

1 image

An Ohio company has received a two-year lease from the N.C. Council of State to store and reship 150,000 tons of coal fly ash from India at the N.C. Port of Morehead City, shown in this file photo. (Dylan Ray photo)

 

 

6

[Dashinka 26,210]

15 minutes ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

 

Coal fly ash from India alarms environmentalists

1 image

An Ohio company has received a two-year lease from the N.C. Council of State to store and reship 150,000 tons of coal fly ash from India at the N.C. Port of Morehead City, shown in this file photo. (Dylan Ray photo)

 

 

6

So recycling is now bad?

 

[IAMX 3,055]

3 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

So recycling is now bad?

 

"alarms environmentalists"

 

Inherently bad. Environmentalist lefties are arbiters of science, didn't you know? Except when it comes to gender science.. then science is bigoted.

Edited July 20, 2017 by IAMX