Sessions met with Russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose

[CaliCat 3,957]

2 hours ago, jg121783 said:

Actually I am not mixing anything. My reference to impeaching Trump has nothing to do with the Sessions non issue. I brought it up because some democrats want to impeach him. How ma you times do we have to go through this? Sessions didn't lie about anything. He answered a question in regards to the election. Some people here have an issue understanding English and the structure of a sentence.

 

I'll try with simple sentences, and more user-friendly structures then: AG Sessions lied. He was under oath. Lying under oath is perjury. He should quit his job. Better now? No Trump. No impeachment. Once the kool-aid wears off, you'll understand.

[jg121783 3,921]

He didn't lie. He was asked if he met with Russians in connection with the election. He truthfully said no. The Democrats should end the which hunt and do their job.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

2 hours ago, jg121783 said:

He didn't lie. He was asked if he met with Russians in connection with the election. He truthfully said no. The Democrats should end the which hunt and do their job.

The best I can give you, IF the two meetings Sessions had but failed to mention, were indeed official capacity business and no mention of Komrad Kandidate Trump came up in them, is he gave an extremely dodgy quarter truth. His toes and pinochio nose crossed the line but he was, perhaps, almost honest.

[CaliCat 3,957]

17 hours ago, jg121783 said:

He didn't lie. He was asked if he met with Russians in connection with the election. He truthfully said no. The Democrats should end the which hunt and do their job.

 

He untruthfully said, no; when he knew it was not true. That is the definition of a lie. 

[jg121783 3,921]

No. He truthfully said he did not meet with the Russians in connection to the election. 

[Lemonslice 5,235]

25 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

No. He truthfully said he did not meet with the Russians in connection to the election. 

And you know this.... how exactly? 

[jg121783 3,921]

Do you or anyone else have proof he met with the Russians regarding the election? In the US you are innocent until proven guilty. Until someone can prove he met with the Russians about the election he told the truth 100%. As much as some of you want there to be a big conspiracy there isn't one.

Edited March 6, 2017 by jg121783

[Lemonslice 5,235]

Lol.  VJ is not a court of law.  

 

Also, if you do not want to show appearance of impropriety, you act accordingly.  

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

37 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

No. He truthfully said he did not meet with the Russians in connection to the election. 

Of course he did. This is the same bunch that went to the mat for Hillary, when she lied many times under oath. 

 

The demand have no vision for America, working class America has left them, the dishonest fake news mainstream media has been exposed. 

 

They have nothing left but division and class warfare.

 

 

 

[jg121783 3,921]

1 hour ago, Lemonslice said:

Lol.  VJ is not a court of law.  

 

Also, if you do not want to show appearance of impropriety, you act accordingly.  

Maybe not but my standards are the same as a court of law. Maybe you have lower standards (like blindly believing the leftist conspiracy theory of the week). I guess we will have to agree to disagree.

[Lemonslice 5,235]

1 hour ago, jg121783 said:

Maybe not but my standards are the same as a court of law. Maybe you have lower standards (like blindly believing the leftist conspiracy theory of the week). I guess we will have to agree to disagree.

... I meant that you don't know for sure more than I know for sure.  From there, you have your opinion, and I have mine.  Unless you are omnipresent, you do have to rely on some reporting to get your information and you do form opinion on things that would not meet any court of law standard, we all have to - you posted many threads on different topics reflecting your opinion (which is a good thing, there would be no discussion if only people with the same thoughts posted here).    

[jg121783 3,921]

You were implying that there is some doubt about whether Sessions met with Russians regarding the elections. I am pointing out that there is nothing there. Therefore as far as any of us know Sessions did not lie.

[CaliCat 3,957]

4 hours ago, jg121783 said:

No. He truthfully said he did not meet with the Russians in connection to the election. 

And that was a lie. 

[jg121783 3,921]

41 minutes ago, CaliCat said:

And that was a lie. 

Proof?

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

On 3/4/2017 at 5:55 PM, Nature Boy Flair said:

So help me understand. There is a segment of our population that believes, Russia fixed the election because they exposed Hillary for actually fixing an election ?