Why did the news media cover up the Bowling Green Massacre? Why?

[verneforchat 139]

1 minute ago, eieio said:

It was neither. I don't post in politics as most are lunatics in there. I sometimes post in the donald,wayofthebern, political revolution and ask trump supporters. I did get banned from political revolution as I made a joke about Warren sending up smoke signals and living in a teepee.

Got it. So you don't post in politics sub, you only copy paste comments from there.

 

It must be hard battling through all that lunacy to copy paste a comment from there.

 

[eieio 1,594]

1 minute ago, verneforchat said:

Got it. So you don't post in politics sub, you only copy paste comments from there.

 

It must be hard battling through all that lunacy to copy paste a comment from there.

 

Apparently you misunderstood. I never copied anything that you are saying I did. If I copied something I have no problem saying such. I feel for you if you are participating in the politics sub over there. Like I said…it is pathetic.

[smilesammich 10,727]

9 hours ago, eieio said:

Kellyanne is an incredibly talented woman and I respect her. She is also a post feminist….we makes her even better. 

 

Also….Women need to stick together and rejoice in the accomplishments of the spectacular ones, not try and tear them down.

 

would love to hear your thoughts on kellyanne's contributions as a post feminist.

maybe you missed the women's march? anyway a liar is a liar is a liar - doesn't matter if a woman or a man always tear down a lie.

[eieio 1,594]

1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

 

would love to hear your thoughts on kellyanne's contributions as a post feminist.

maybe you missed the women's march? anyway a liar is a liar is a liar - doesn't matter if a woman or a man always tear down a lie.

For starters...only woman to lead a presidential campaign to victory. Women should be rallying behind this highly successful and intelligent woman.

Edited February 6, 2017 by eieio

[bcking 3,157]

11 hours ago, eieio said:

Kellyanne is an incredibly talented woman and I respect her. She is also a post feminist….we makes her even better. 

 

Also….Women need to stick together and rejoice in the accomplishments of the spectacular ones, not try and tear them down.

"Women" should be able to decide for themselves whether they think the accomplishments of a particular other "person" (woman or man) is worthy of praise and joy. Just like a man can.

 

Unfortunately for Kellyanne it just seems that more women have deemed her accomplishments as unworthy of their praise and adoration. 

 

Someone can be an "accomplished" serial killer. That doesn't mean you rejoice in their achievements.

[Merle 458]

18 hours ago, smilesammich said:

what they got out of the raid..was old info. 

 

Since you seem to be "in the know" with the military intelligence community, can you pretty please get us some pics of Bin Laden's corpse? I've always wanted to see some.

[eieio 1,594]

21 minutes ago, bcking said:

"Women" should be able to decide for themselves whether they think the accomplishments of a particular other "person" (woman or man) is worthy of praise and joy. Just like a man can.

 

Unfortunately for Kellyanne it just seems that more women have deemed her accomplishments as unworthy of their praise and adoration. 

 

Someone can be an "accomplished" serial killer. That doesn't mean you rejoice in their achievements.

I agree. That's why woman voted for Trump over Clinton.

[bcking 3,157]

3 minutes ago, eieio said:

I agree. That's why woman voted for Trump over Clinton.

I'm sure that a  "woman" singular voted for Trump. But "women" plural did not vote for "Trump over Clinton".

 

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/

 

" Women supported Clinton over Trump by 54% to 42%. This is about the same as the Democratic advantage among women in 2012 (55% Obama vs. 44% Romney) and 2008 (56% Obama vs. 43% McCain). "

[eieio 1,594]

1 minute ago, bcking said:

I'm sure that a  "woman" singular voted for Trump. But "women" plural did not vote for "Trump over Clinton".

 

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/

 

" Women supported Clinton over Trump by 54% to 42%. This is about the same as the Democratic advantage among women in 2012 (55% Obama vs. 44% Romney) and 2008 (56% Obama vs. 43% McCain). "

So 42% didn't fall for the sexist stuff. 

[bcking 3,157]

Just now, eieio said:

So 42% didn't fall for the sexist stuff. 

Whole different discussion/argument, and not relevant to what we are talking about. YOu stating "Woman voted for Trump over Clinton". While you are right that a singular "woman" did, if you intended to mean plural you were wrong. 

[eieio 1,594]

1 minute ago, bcking said:

Whole different discussion/argument, and not relevant to what we are talking about. YOu stating "Woman voted for Trump over Clinton". While you are right that a singular "woman" did, if you intended to mean plural you were wrong. 

Ok. I should have clarified. Thanks for pointing that out

[OriZ 3,165]

You guys are crackin me up today. *gets the popcorn*

[bcking 3,157]

3 minutes ago, eieio said:

Ok. I should have clarified. Thanks for pointing that out

You're very welcome. My services are always available. 

[eieio 1,594]

4 minutes ago, OriZ said:

You guys are crackin me up today. *gets the popcorn*

Just trying to make VJ great again!

[bcking 3,157]

Just now, eieio said:

Just trying to make VJ great again!

Well if we wanted to do that I guess we would have to ban new members joining from certain places...