Jump to content
Sime26

K-1 Fiance(e) or K3 Spousal? - Civil Union

 Share

5 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

Hi Everyone.


I am new to this and am desperately trying not to make a mistake to avoid delays or being denied.



I am an American citizen wanting to sponsor a Canadian citizen and I just want to make sure I file the correct petition.


Here's our situation:


· We are a heterosexual couple (man/woman).


· We have been together since 2009, but we entered in a Civil Union in August 2013 in the Province of Quebec in Canada.


· In the province of Quebec, civil unions are equivalent to marriages in rights and obligations.



The main difference between civil unions and marriages is that civil unions can be ended without a divorce simply through a notary or when the couple decides to marry each other.



The certificate that we obtained from the government says “civil union and not marriage act.” We are also told that this type of union is only valid here in Quebec and not anywhere else. In Canada, our civil union allows her to sponsor me for Permanent Residence because it is equivalent to marriage.



Should I file for a fiancé visa (K-1) or a spousal visa (k-3) based on the above information? Will the U.S. consider our union as an official marriage or since we are both free to marry each other should we apply for a Fiance visa? (Should we ignore the civil union?)



This is so confusing. I don't know where to get help. Should I try to call the USCIS call center? Has anyone been in a similar situation?



Thanks for any advice!


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Welcome to VJ! I've removed a duplicate post (please post just once on a topic) and have moved this one from the CR-1 Process forum to the Canada regional forum, where several members will have input on which visa type might be right for you, given the legalities in Quebec. Good luck!

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

Hi Everyone.

I am new to this and am desperately trying not to make a mistake to avoid delays or being denied.

I am an American citizen wanting to sponsor a Canadian citizen and I just want to make sure I file the correct petition.

Here's our situation:

· We are a heterosexual couple (man/woman).

· We have been together since 2009, but we entered in a Civil Union in August 2013 in the Province of Quebec in Canada.

· In the province of Quebec, civil unions are equivalent to marriages in rights and obligations.

The main difference between civil unions and marriages is that civil unions can be ended without a divorce simply through a notary or when the couple decides to marry each other.

The certificate that we obtained from the government says “civil union and not marriage act.” We are also told that this type of union is only valid here in Quebec and not anywhere else. In Canada, our civil union allows her to sponsor me for Permanent Residence because it is equivalent to marriage.

Should I file for a fiancé visa (K-1) or a spousal visa (k-3) based on the above information? Will the U.S. consider our union as an official marriage or since we are both free to marry each other should we apply for a Fiance visa? (Should we ignore the civil union?)

This is so confusing. I don't know where to get help. Should I try to call the USCIS call center? Has anyone been in a similar situation?

Thanks for any advice!

I would say file for K-1 as you are not legally married in the eyes/law of US......or you can get married legally and file for CR-1

In the US of A...you are Married

http://www.immigration-quebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/choose-quebec/daily-life/marriage.html

Civil union

Two persons may also contract a civil union. The civil union was designed in Québec for the benefit of couples of the opposite or same sex who wish to publicly commit to a life together and to respect the rights and obligations of that union. It is equivalent to marriage.

The content available on a site dedicated to bringing folks to America should not be promoting racial discord, euro-supremacy, discrimination based on religion , exclusion of groups from immigration based on where they were born, disenfranchisement of voters rights based on how they might vote.

horsey-change.jpg?w=336&h=265

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

The content available on a site dedicated to bringing folks to America should not be promoting racial discord, euro-supremacy, discrimination based on religion , exclusion of groups from immigration based on where they were born, disenfranchisement of voters rights based on how they might vote.

horsey-change.jpg?w=336&h=265

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...